Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:41:35.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variation of digestibility and intake by sheep of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) hays cut at sunrise or sunset

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2011

D. ANDUEZA
Affiliation:
INRA-UR1213 Herbivores, Centre de Theix, 63122 Saint Genès, Champanelle, France
I. DELGADO
Affiliation:
CITA-Aragón, P.O. Box. 727, 50080 Zaragoza, Spain
F. MUÑOZ*
Affiliation:
CITA-Aragón, P.O. Box. 727, 50080 Zaragoza, Spain
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]

Summary

An experiment was carried out in 2006 in the Ebro Valley of Spain to test the differences in chemical composition, ruminal degradation, in vivo digestibility and intake between lucerne hays cut at sunrise (AM) or at sunset (PM). Measurements were carried out at 0·50 flowering during spring, summer and autumn growth cycles. PM hays showed higher contents of soluble carbohydrates, starch and total non-structural carbohydrates than AM hays. No significant differences between times of cutting were found for crude protein, neutral detergent fibre, acid detergent fibre or acid detergent lignin. Effective degradability of dry matter (DM) was higher in autumn PM hay (0·57±0·008) than AM hay (0·47±0·008). No differences between times of cutting were found for hays cut in spring or summer. Effective degradability of nitrogen was significantly higher in summer and autumn PM hays than in AM hays. However, degradability did not differ significantly between times of cutting for the hays cut in spring. Differences in organic matter digestibility averaged 0·02±0·008 in spring and 0·05±0·008 in autumn, but no differences were found between cutting times for lucerne hays in summer. For DM intake, differences between PM and AM hays were significant in spring (57±2·0 v. 46±2·0 g/kg BW0·75, respectively) and summer (60±2·0 v. 52±2·0 g/kg BW0·75, respectively), but not significant in autumn (55±2·0 v. 51±2·0 g/kg BW0·75, respectively). Finally, digestible organic matter intake in sheep was higher for PM (34±1·3, 36±1·3 and 32±1·3 g/kg BW0·75) than for AM hays (27±1·3, 30±1·3 and 27±1·3 g/kg BW0·75) in spring, summer and autumn, respectively. In conclusion, cutting lucerne at sunset could be a simple management strategy for improving the feed value of hays.

Type
Animal Research
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich, J. M., Muller, L. D., Varga, G. A. & Griel, L. C. (1993). Nonstructural carbohydrate and protein effects on rumen fermentation, nutrient flow, and performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 76, 10911105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andueza, D., Delgado, I. & Muñoz, F. (2009). Effect of lucerne preservation method on the feed value of forage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 89, 19911996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AOAC (1990). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 15th edn. (Ed. Helrich, K.). Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Argyle, J. L. & Baldwin, R. L. (1989). Effects of amino acids and peptides on rumen microbial growth yields. Journal of Dairy Science 72, 20172027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, D. K. & Sheaffer, C. C. (1995). Alfalfa. In Forages. Volume I. An Introduction to Grassland Agriculture (Eds Barnes, R. F., Miller, D. A. & Nelson, C. J.), pp. 205216. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Bélanger, G., Pelletier, S., Tremblay, G. F., Bertrand, A., Drapeau, R., Castonguay, Y. & Pageu, D. (2010). Non structural carbohydrate concentration of AM and PM-cut forage species. In Grassland in a Changing World: Proceedings of the 23rd General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation (Eds Schnyder, H., Isselstein, J., Taube, F., Auerswald, K., Schellberg, J., Wachendorf, M., Herrmann, A., Gierus, M., Wrage, N. & Hopkins, A.), pp. 473475. Kiel, Germany: Mecke Druck Und Verlag.Google Scholar
Brown, R. H., Blaser, R. E. & Fontenot, J. P. (1963). Digestibility of fall grown Kentucky 31 fescue. Agronomy Journal 55, 321324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J. C., Mayland, H. F. & Fisher, D. S. (2005). Dry matter intake and digestion of alfalfa harvested at sunset and sunrise. Journal of Animal Science 83, 262270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burns, J. C., Fisher, D. S. & Mayland, H. F. (2007). Diurnal shifts in nutritive value of alfalfa harvested as hay and evaluated by animal intake and digestion. Crop Science 47, 21902197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buxton, D. R. (1996). Quality related characteristics of forage as influenced by plant environment and agronomic factors. Animal Feed Science and Technology 59, 3749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buysse, J. & Merckx, R. (1993). An improved colorimetric method to quantify sugar content of plant tissue. Journal of Experimental of Botany 44, 16271629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterton, N. J., Harrison, P. A., Bennet, J. H. & Asay, K. H. (1989). Carbohydrate partitioning in 185 accessions of gramineae grown under warm and cool temperatures. Journal of Plant Physiology 134, 169179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanlo, R., Chocarro, C., Lloveras, J., Ferran, X., Serra, J., Salvia, J., Muñoz, F., Andueza, D. & Delgado, I. (2006). Alfalfa production and quality in Northeast Spain. In Sustainable grassland productivity: Proceedings of the 21st General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation (Eds Lloveras, J., Gonzalez-Rodriguez, A., Vazquez-Yañez, O., Piñeiro, J., Santamaria, O., Olea, L. & Poblaciones, M. J.), pp. 261263. Badajoz, Spain: Organizing Committee of the 21st General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation. Sociedad Española para el Estudio de los Pastos.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. S., Mayland, H. F. & Burns, J. C. (1999). Variation in ruminants’ preference for tall fescue hays cut either at sundown or at sunup. Journal of Animal Science 77, 762768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, D. S., Mayland, H. F. & Burns, J. C. (2002). Variation in ruminant preference for alfalfa hays cut at sunup and sundown. Crop Science 42, 231237.Google ScholarPubMed
Fisher, D. S., Burns, J. C. & Mayland, H. F. (2005). Ruminant selection among switchgrass hays cut at either sundown or sunup. Crop Science 45, 13941402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. B. & Weimer, P. J. (2007). Sucrose concentration alters fermentation kinetics, products, and carbon fates during in vitro fermentation with mixed ruminal microbes. Journal of Animal Science 85, 14671478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huntington, G. B. & Burns, J. C. (2007). Afternoon harvest increases readily fermentable carbohydrate concentration and voluntary intake of gamagrass and switchgrass baleage by beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 85, 276284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mertens, D. R. (1994). Regulation of forage intake. In Forage Quality, Evaluation and Utilization (Eds Fahey, G. C., Collins, M., Mertens, D. R. & Moser, L. E.), pp. 450493. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Miller, L. A., Moorby, J. M., Davies, D. R., Jumphreys, M. O., Scollan, N. D., Macrae, J. C. & Theodorou, M. K. (2001). Increased concentration of water-soluble carbohydrate in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.): milk production from late-lactation dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 56, 383394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, R. J., Rutter, S. M., Penning, P. D. & Rook, A. J. (2001). Matching grass supply to grazing patterns for dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 56, 352361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. (1992). Protein Nutrition in Ruminants. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & McDonald, I. (1979). The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 499503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelletier, S., Tremblay, G. F., Lafrenière, C., Bertrand, A., Bélanger, G., Castonguay, Y. & Rowsell, J. (2009). Nonstructural carbohydrate concentrations in timothy as affected by N fertilization, stage of development and time of cutting. Agronomy Journal 101, 13721380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. (1998). SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6.12. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Sauvé, A. K., Huntington, G. B. & Burns, J. C. (2009). Effects of total nonstructural carbohydrates and nitrogen balance on voluntary intake of goats and digestibility of gamagrass hay harvested at sunrise and sunset. Animal Feed Science and Technology 148, 93106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauvé, A. K., Huntington, G. B., Whisnant, C. S. & Burns, J. C. (2010). Intake, digestibility and nitrogen balance of steers fed gamagrass baleage topdressed at two rates of nitrogen and harvested at sunset and sunrise. Crop Science 50, 427437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. (1973). The nonstructural carbohydrates. In Chemistry and Biochemistry of Herbage (Eds Butler, G. W. & Bailey, R. W.), pp. 105155. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 35833597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vérité, R. & Peyraud, J. L. (1989). Protein: The PDI system. In Ruminant Nutrition (Ed. Jarrige, R.), pp. 3347. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. R. & Ford, C. W. (1973). Temperature influences on the in vitro digestibility and soluble carbohydrate accumulation of tropical and temperate grasses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24, 187198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yañez Ruiz, D. R., Martin Garcia, A. I., Moumen, A. & Molina Alcaide, E. (2004). Ruminal fermentation and degradation patterns, protozoa population and urinary purine derivatives excretion in goats and wethers fed diets based on olive leaves. Journal of Animal Science 82, 30063014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar