Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-b4m5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-17T13:36:30.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The validity of the critical size theory for particles leaving the rumen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. P. Poppi ,
B. W. Norton ,
D. J. Minson  and
R. E. Hendricksen
D. P. Poppi
Affiliation:
University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
B. W. Norton
Affiliation:
University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
D. J. Minson
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O. Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, St. Lucia, Queensland, 4067 Australia
R. E. Hendricksen
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O. Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, St. Lucia, Queensland, 4067 Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Three grasses and two legumes, each at two stages of maturity, were fed to three fistulated sheep and samples of the feed, and faeces and contents of the reticulo-rumen, abomasum and ileum were collected for the determination of particle size by wet sieving. Modulus of fineness (MF) was calculated for all particulate matter that failed to pass a 0·15 mm screen. Resistance to flow from the rumen of feed particles of different sizes was also calculated.

The mean MF of the reticulo-rumen contents was 2·56 compared with 5·72 for the feed. Material leaving the rumen and found in the abomasum had a MF of 1·67 and subsequent changes were small and not significant; ileum 1·63, faeces 1·80. Particles greater than 1·18 mm passed out of the reticulo-rumen although the quantity was small (1–3%). The resistance to flow of particles of different sizes from the reticulo-rumen was closely related to particle size with no difference between grasses and legumes or between young and mature forages.

It was concluded that in modelling the flow of particles from the reticulo-rumen a non-compartmentalized approach should be adopted, but if a simple two-compartment model is required then a critical sieve size of about 1·18 mm may be useful, since less than 5% of the particulate material is retained on this sieve size.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 94 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 275 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Society of Agricultural Engineers (1967). Method of determining modulus of uniformity and modulus of fineness of ground feed. Agricultural Engineers Yearbook p. 301.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. & Campling, R. C. (1962). Regulation of voluntary food intake in ruminants. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 32, 669–686.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. L., Koong, L. J., Ulyatt, M. J. & Smith, N. (1976). Towards a synthesis. In From Plant to Animal Protein, Reviews in Rural Science, vol. II (ed. Sutherland, T. M., McWilliam, J. R. and Leng, R. A.), pp. 175–181. Armidale, Australia: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Bourget, S. J. & Kemp, J. D. (1957). Wet sieving apparatus for stability analysis of soil aggregates. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 37, 60.Google Scholar
Ellis, W. C. & Huston, J. E. (1967). Caution concerning the stained particle technique for determining gastrointestinal retention time of dietary residues. Journal of Dairy Science 50, 1996–1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, P. V. & Wright, L. H. (1918). A study of the physical changes in feed residues which take place in cattle during digestion. Journal of Agricultural Research 13, 639–646.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. & Reid, G. W. (1973). The effects of pelleting various diets on intake and digestibility in sheep and cattle. Animal Production 16, 223–233.Google Scholar
Grenet, E. (1970). Size and structure of plant particles in the omasum and faeces of cattle. Annales de Biologie Animale, Biochimie et Biophysique 10, 643–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1966). The Rumen and Its Microbes. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Matis, J. H. (1972). Gamma time dependency in Blaxter's compartmental model. Biometrics 28, 597–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matis, J. H. & Hartley, H. O. (1971). Stochastic compartmental analysis: model and least squares estimation from time series data. Biometrics 27, 77–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, G. R. (1967). Changes in particle size in the reticulorumen of sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 18, 119–125.Google Scholar
Reid, C. S. W., Ulyatt, M. J. & Munro, J. A. (1977). The physical breakdown of feed during digestion in the rumen. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 37, 173–175.Google Scholar
Smith, L. W., Waldo, D. R. & Moore, L. A. (1965). Particle size separation of cell wall constituents. Journal of Animal Science 24, 903–904.Google Scholar
Smith, L. W., Waldo, D. R., Moore, L. A., Leffel, E. C. & van Soest, P. J. (1967). Passage of plant cell wall constituents in sheep. Journal of Dairy Science 50, 990.Google Scholar
Troelsen, J. E. & Campbell, J. B. (1968). Voluntary consumption of forage by sheep and its relation to the size and shape of particles in the digestive tract. Animal Production 10, 289–296.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J., Baldwin, R. L. & Koong, L. J. (1976). The basis of nutritive value – a modelling approach. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 36, 140–149.Google Scholar
van Soest, P. J. (1966). Forage intake in relation to chemical composition and digestibility: some new concepts. Proceedings 23rd Southern Pasture Forage Crop Improvement Conference, Blacksburg, Virginia, pp. 24–36.Google Scholar
Walker, D. J. & Forrest, W. W. (1964). The application of calorimetry to the study of ruminal fermentation in vitro. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 15, 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar