Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:23:26.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The use of vaginal sponges in spring breeding of Mutton Merino and cross-bred ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. Goot
Affiliation:
The Volcani Institute of Agricultural Research, Rehovot, Israel
H. Schindler
Affiliation:
The Volcani Institute of Agricultural Research, Rehovot, Israel

Summary

Fifty-nine Mutton Merino and cross-bred 2-year-old and older ewes were allotted to two groups according to age, weight and breeding performance in the preceding 1966/67 in-season. In the experimental ewes the treatment started on 22 March 1967 and consisted of vaginal sponges (Syncro-Mate) inserted for 17 days and 750 i.u./ewe of P.M.S. injected on the day of the removal of the sponges.

As from 1 March, all the ewes were ‘teased’ daily but hand service commenced on 20 April, to coincide with the 13th day after the removal of the sponges.

At the time of sponge insertion, approximately a third of the ewes, in each group, were already cycling. The treatment advanced the average post-treatment oestrus by 8 days, out of a possible 15 days, synchronized it in 70% of ewes and shortened the tupping season in 97% of treated ewes to 9 days (23 days in controls), but otherwise the performance of the treated ewes (and their offspring) did not differ from that of the controls. In both groups forty ewes lambed (68%) and fifty lambs were born (85%). Out of nineteen dry ewes, five were in anoestrus and in at least nine, an early death of the embryo could be suspected. Among the reproductive activities during the preceding in-season, date of weaning, days of suckling and barrenness may be implicated in the failure to breed in the spring.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barker, C. A. V. (1966). Progestin impregnated vaginal pessaries for oestrus cycle synchronization in sheep. Can. vet. J. 7, 189–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Clarke, J. N., Roberts, E. M., Carter, A. H. & Kirton, A. H. (1966). Hormonal synchronization of oestrus in Romney ewes during breeding season. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 26, 107–21.Google Scholar
Cunningham, J. M. M., Deas, D. W. & Fitzsimons, J. (1967). Synchronization of oestrus in ewes. Vet. Rec. 80, 590–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edey, T. N. & Thwaites, C. J. (1966). Synchronization of ewes at the second oestrus after progestagen treatment. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 6, 3843.Google Scholar
Ellington, E. F., Fox, C. W. & Short, G. E. (1966). Reproductive performance of ewes following early weaning and subsequent intravaginal treatment with progestogen-impregnated pessaries. Programme and Abstracts 9th Int. Cong. Anim. Prod., Edinburgh, p. 27. London: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Goot, H. (1967). Some data on out-of-season lambing in Mutton Merino ewes. Israel J. agric. Res. 174, 219–24.Google Scholar
Lamond, D. R. (1964). Synchronization of ovarian cycles in sheep and cattle. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 32, 269.Google Scholar
Lees, J. L. (1964). Inhibitory effect of lactation on the breeding activity of the ewe. Nature, Lond. 203, 1089–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lishman, A. W. & Hunter, G. L. (1961). Synchronization of the oestrus cycle in sheep. S. Afr. J. agric. Sci. 4, 35.Google Scholar
Roberts, E. M. (1966). The use of intra vaginal sponges impregnated with 6-methyl-17-acetoxyprogesterone (MAP) to synchronize ovarian activity in cyclic Merino ewes. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 6, 32–7.Google Scholar
Roberts, E. M. & Edgar, D. G. (1966). The stimulation of fertile oestrus in anoestrus Romney ewes. J. Rep. Fert. 12, 561–4, 565–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. J. (1964). Synchronization of oestrus in sheep by intravaginal and subcutaneous application of progestin impregnated sponges. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 5, 4752.Google Scholar
Wishart, D. F. (1966). The induction of earlier breeding activity in sheep Vet. Rec. 79, 356–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed