Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:06:55.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of the in vitro fermentation technique to estimate the digestible energy content of some Egyptian forages I. The in vitro digestion of cellulose as a criterion of energy content

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. M. A. Naga  and
K. el-Shazly
M. M. A. Naga
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University, Egypt
K. el-Shazly
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University, Egypt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Twelve digestibility trials were carried out using three adult rams on seven legumes and five nonlegume roughages.

In vitro fermentations were carried out over 24 hr. and the percentage cellulose digestion was determined. The whole rumen juice used to inoculate the fermentation tubes was obtained from a sheep with a permanent rumen fistula. Carbon dioxide was bubbled through during the fermentation run, unless otherwise indicated, to ensure anaerobic conditions.

The following significant correlations were calculated from the results:

In vivo and in vitro cellulose digestion for non-legumes: r = 0·93.

In vivo cellulose digestion and D.E./kg. D.M. for non-legumes: r = 0·90.

In vitro cellulose digestion and D.E./kg. D.M. for non-legumes: r = 0·90.

In vitro cellulose digestion and D.E./kg. D.M. for non-legumes + alfalfa and cashrangeeg: r = 0·91.

In vitro cellulose digestion and D.E./kg. D.M. for all forages tested gave a highly significant correlation: r = 0·73.

In vitro cellulose digestion and D.E./kg. D.M. for legumes: r = −0·77.

Regression equations calculated for non-legumes and for all tested forages, when used for predicting D.E./kg. D.M. gave values which differed from the determined digestible energy by ± 8·70and ± 9·90% respectively. Applying Hershberger's regression equation to the present data, the D.E./kg. D.M. values differed by ± 8·69%.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , August 1963 , pp. 73 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Annison, E. F. (1954). Biochem. J. 57, 400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, D. A. & Rowland, S. J. (1957). Brit. J. Nutr. 11, 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, A. J. (1957). J. Agric. Sci. 49, 467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgardt, B. R., Caron, J. L. & Markley, R. A. (1958). J. Anim. Sci. 17, 1205.Google Scholar
Bawden, D. M. & Church, D. C. (1961). J. Anim. Sci. 20, 668.Google Scholar
Bentley, O. G., Johnson, R. R., Vanecke, S. & Hunt, C. H. (1954). J. Anim. Sci. p. 581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, O. G., Johnson, R. R., Hershberger, T. V., Cline, J. H. & Moxon, A. L. (1955). J. Nutr. 57, 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, M. P. & Doetsch, R. N. (1955). J. Dairy Sci. 38, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clink, J. H., Hershberger, T. V. & Bentley, O. G. (1958). J. Anim. Sci. 17, 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conn, H. J. (1940). Biological Stains, 4th ed. Biotech. Publication Geneva N.Y.Google Scholar
Crampton, E. W. & Maynard, L. A. (1938). J. Nutr. 15, 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullison, A. E. (1960). J. Animal Sci. 19, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehority, B. A., Bentley, O. G., Johnson, R. R. & Moxon, A. L. (1957). J. Anim. Sci. 16, 502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehority, B. A., el-Shazly, K. & Johnson, R. R. (1960). J. Anim. Sci. 19, 1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donefer, E., Crampton, E. W. & Lloyd, L. E. (1959). J. Anim. Sci. 18, 1538.Google Scholar
Donefer, E., Crampton, E. W. & Lloyd, L. E. (1960 a). J. Anim. Sci. 19, 545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donefer, E., Crampton, E. W. & Lloyd, L. E. (1960 b). J. Anim. Sci. 19, 1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsden, S. R. (1945). J. Exp. Biol. 22, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsden, S. R. (1946). Biochem. J. 40, 252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garton, G. A. (1960). Digestive physiology and nutrition of the ruminant. Proc. Nottingham Univ. 9th ed. Easter Sch. Agric. Sci. pp. 140–51.Google Scholar
Gray, F. V. & Pilgrim, A. F. (1952). J. Exp. Biol. 29, 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershberger, T. V., Long, T. A., Hartook, E. W. & Swift, R. W. (1959). J. Anim. Sci. 18, 770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, P. N. & Mann, S. O. (1961). J. Gen. Microbiol. 25, 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1957). Canad. J. Microbiol. 3, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. R., Dehority, B. A. & Bentley, O. G. (1958). J. Anim. Sci. 17, 841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, F. & Watkin, J. (1937). A Practical Course in Agricultural Chemistry. London: MacMillan and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Louw, J. G., Williams, H. H. & Maynard, L. A. (1949). Science, 110, 478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marston, H. R. (1948). Biochem. J. 42, 564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moir, R. J. & Masson, M. J. (1952). J. Path. Bact. 44, 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, F. B. (1954). Feeds and Feeding. Ithaca, New York: The Morrison Corporation Publ.Google Scholar
Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1955). A.O.A.C. Washington 4, D.C.Google Scholar
Phillipson, A. T. (1952). Brit. J. Nutr. 6, 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quick, G. V., Bentley, O. G., Scott, H. W., Johnson, R. R. & Moxon, A. L. (1959). J. Anim. Sci. 18, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. T. (1956). J. Dairy Sci. 33, 735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, R. L., Shelton, D. C., Welch, J. A. & Jung, G. A. (1959). J. Anim. Sci. 18, 1537.Google Scholar
Reid, R. L., Klark, B., Welch, J. A., Jung, G. A. & Shelton, D. C. (1960). J. Anim. Sci. 19, 1312.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. H., Lucas, H. L., Pavlech, H. M. & Cepalloni, M. A. (1952). J. Anim. Sci. 11, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
el-Shazly, K. (1952). Biochem. J. 51, 647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
el-Shazly, K., Dehority, B. A. & Johnson, R. R. (1961). J. Anim. Sci. 20, 268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sijpesteijn, A. K. (1948). Ph.D. Thesis, Leiden.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1949). Statistical Methods, 5th ed.Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
Swift, R. W. (1957). J. Anim. Sci. 16, 753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, C. (1950). Animal Nutrition. London: Chapman and Hill Ltd.Google Scholar
Warner, A. C. (1956). J. Gen. Microbiol. 14, 733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar