Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:04:01.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of successional sowing in evaluating cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) adaptation to drought in the Sudan savannah zone. 2. Response of reproductive traits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

N. Muleba
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Cowpea Agronomy, SAFGRAD, 01 BP 1495, Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso
M. Mwanke
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Cowpea Agronomy, SAFGRAD, 01 BP 1495, Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso
I. Drabo
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Cowpea Agronomy, SAFGRAD, 01 BP 1495, Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso

Summary

Two sets of experiments on cowpea sowing date were conducted in 1983–85 at Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. One set tested six daylength-insensitive (DI) cultivars and the other compared four or five daylength-sensitive (DS) cultivars with one or two DI cultivars as controls. Sowing after inadequate rainfall, particularly when followed by drought stress, impeded seedling establishment and growth. Severe drought stress during the reproductive growth stages and prolonged drought stress throughout the crop season adversely affected flowering, flowering intensity and subsequent yield. Cultivar differences in ability to withstand drought damage were observed. The ability of cultivars to (i) branch profusely, to compensate for stands lost by drought during seedling growth and (ii) flower at such a time that pod set and fill coincide with favourable climatic conditions appears to be a prerequisite for satisfactory adaptation to the Sudan savannah zone of semi-arid West Africa. Daylength-sensitivity and early maturity per se were inadequate to prevent yield losses under drought conditions.

Type
Crops and Soils
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cocheme, J. & Franquin, P. (1967). Une étude d'agroclimatologie de l'Afrique au sud du Sahara en Afrique Occidentale. Rapport Technique, Projet Conjoint d d'Agroclimatique FAO/UNESCO/OMM.Google Scholar
Muleba, N. (1988). Responses of cowpea to high soil temperature and drought. In Food Grain Production in Semi-arid Africa (Eds Menyonga, J. M., Bezuneh, T. & Youdeowei, A.), pp. 331349. Proceedings of an International drought symposium. Trowbridge, UK: OAU/STRCSAFGRAD (Redwood Burn Ltd).Google Scholar
Muleba, N., Mwanke, M. & Drabo, I. (1991). Use of successional sowing in evaluating cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) adaptation to drought in the Sudan savannah zone. 1. Seed yield response. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 116, 7381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turk, K. J., Hall, A. E. & Asbell, C. W. (1980). Drought adaptation of cowpea. 1. Influence of drought on seed yield. Agronomy Journal 72, 413420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warrag, M. O. A. & Hall, A. E. (1983). Reproductive responses of cowpea to heat stress: genotypic differences in tolerance to heat at flowering. Crop Science 23, 10881092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warrag, M. O. A. & Hall, A. E. (1984). Reproductive responses of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) to heat stress. 2. Responses to night air temperatures. Field Crops Research 8, 1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziska, L. H. & Hall, A. E. (1983). Seed yield and water use of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) subjected to planned water-deficit irrigation. Irrigation Science 3, 237245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar