Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:22:51.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unsaturated water transmission characteristics of soils in relation to texture, aggregate size and initial moisture content

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. C. Mundra ,
Raj Pal ,
R. S. Siyag  and
S. R. Poonia
M. C. Mundra
Affiliation:
Department of Soils, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar J25004, India
Raj Pal
Affiliation:
Department of Soils, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar J25004, India
R. S. Siyag
Affiliation:
Department of Soils, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar J25004, India
S. R. Poonia
Affiliation:
Department of Soils, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar J25004, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

To study the effect of soil texture, aggregate size and initial moisture content on soil water diffusivity, D(θ), and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, K(θ), horizontal absorption experiments were conducted on samples of loamy sand, sandy loam and clay–loam soils as well as on artificially prepared water-stable aggregates of a clay–loam sample (sizes 0.·25–0–25, 0·25–0·5, 0·5–1, 1–2, and 2–4 mm). For comparable moisture contents, D(θ) followed the order loamy sand > sandy loam > clay–loam. The effect of initial moisture content on D(θ) varied with soil texture. K(θ), which was evaluated using D(θ) for air-dry initial moisture content and the slopes of the water retention curves, also varied with soil texture.

The D(θ) function for air-dry initial moisture content increased with the decrease in aggregate size, the increase being more pronounced below a size of 1 mm. Values of D(θ) obtained from initially airdry soil and at 10% of saturation moisture content did not differ greatly from one another. The K(θ) function was almost the same for aggregate sizes 1–2 and 2–4 mm. In the size ranges of < 1 mm, K(θ) increased with the decrease in aggregate size. The particle/aggregate size range of 0·1–0·5 mm was the most conducive to unsaturated water flow.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 112 , Issue 2 , April 1989 , pp. 199 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balasubramanian, V., Ahuja, L. R., Kanehiro, Y. & Green, R. E. (1976). Movement of water and nitrate in an unsaturated aggregated soil during non-steady infiltration – a simplified solution for solute flow. Soil Science 122, 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, R. R. & Klute, A. (1956). Measurement of soil moisture diffusivity. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 20, 458–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhanpal, & Varade, S. B. (1973). Intrinsic penetrability and diffusivity as influenced by texture and initial moisture content. Geoderma 8, 103–110.Google Scholar
Gumbs, F. A. & Warkentin, B. P. (1975). Prediction of infiltration of water into aggregated clay soil samples. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 39, 255–263.Google Scholar
Pal, R. & Stroosnijder, L. (1976). Experimental verification of two calculation methods for relating horizontal infiltration to soil water diffusivity. Geoderma 15, 413–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philip, J. R. (1957). The theory of infiltration. 5. The influence of initial moisture content. Soil Science 84, 329–339.Google Scholar
Rose, D. A. (1971). Water movement in dry soils. 2. An analysis of hysteresis. Journal of Soil Science 22, 490–507.Google Scholar
Siyag, R. S., Pal, R. & Poonia, S. R. (1983). Water transmission of unsaturated soil samples in relation to mixed Na−(Ca + Mg) solutions. Geoderma 31, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroosnijder, L. & Bolt, G. H. (1974). Nomographic interpretation of water absorption data in terms of a two parametric function. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 38, 876–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topp, G. C. (1969). Soil water hysteresis measured in a sandy loam and compared with the hysteresis domain model. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 33, 645–651.Google Scholar