Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T02:04:09.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding the effect of a triazole with anti-gibberellin activity on the growth and yield of oilseed rape (Brassica napus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

P. M. BERRY  and
J. H. SPINK
P. M. BERRY*
Affiliation:
ADAS High Mowthorpe, Duggleby, Malton, North Yorkshire YO17 8BP, UK
J. H. SPINK
Affiliation:
ADAS Rosemaund, Preston Wynne, Hereford HR1 3PG, UK
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of the anti-gibberellin triazole metconazole on yield, lodging resistance, seeds/m2 (sink size) and rooting in the presence of negligible amounts of disease were investigated using five multi-site experiments carried out in the UK between 1999 and 2007. The green area index (GAI) of the crop at the time of application had the greatest influence on the yield response across 173 comparisons between metconazole-treated and untreated crops. Crops with a GAI in March (growth stage (GS) 3·3–3·5 ‘green bud’) of 0·8–2·8, which represented moderate to large sized UK commercial crops, had an average response of +0·21 t/ha to metconazole applied at the full recommended rate of 1·2 litres/ha. Crops with a GAI of less than 0·8, which represented small commercial crops, had an average response of −0·14 t/ha. Applications between green bud and early flowering gave the greatest yield increase. Positive yield responses were associated with a reduction in lodging, or more seeds/m2, or a combination of both. The proportional area lodged was reduced by 0·1 for each 50 mm reduction in crop height (R2=0·60; P<0·001). Across six field trials, metconazole applied in spring increased root length density between soil depths of 0·40 and 1·00 m from an average of 0·478 to 0·601 cm/cm3 (P<0·05). It was estimated that this could increase yield by 0·2–0·3 t/ha in a dry season. The results show that the growth regulatory properties of metconazole can be used to improve several key aspects of growth that are believed to restrict current farm yields.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 147 , Issue 3 , June 2009 , pp. 273 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon (1994). Fertiliser Recommendations for Agricultural and Horticultural Crops. 6th edn. MAFF (now DEFRA) Reference Book 209. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Anon (2000). Fertiliser Recommendations for Agricultural and Horticultural Crops. 7th edn. MAFF (now DEFRA) Reference Book 209. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Armstrong, E. L. & Nicol, H. I. (1991). Reducing height and lodging in rapeseed with growth regulators. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 31, 245–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barraclough, P. B. (1989). Root growth, macro-nutrient uptake dynamics and soil fertility requirements of a high-yielding winter oilseed rape crop. Plant and Soil 119, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barraclough, P. B. & Leigh, R. A. (1984). The growth and activity of winter wheat roots in the field: the effect of sowing date and soil type on root growth of high yielding crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 103, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, A. D. & Hutley-Bull, P. D. (1991). The effects of a paclobutrazol-based growth regulator on the yield, quality and ease of management of oilseed rape. Annals of Applied Biology 118, 445–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baylis, A. D. & Wright, T. J. (1990). The effects of lodging and a paclobutrazol – chlormequat chloride mixture on the yield and quality of oilseed rape. Annals of Applied Biology 116, 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, P. M. & Spink, J. H. (2006). A physiological analysis of oilseed rape yields: past and future. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 144, 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, J., Spink, J. & Bingham, I. (2006). Management of Oilseed Rape to Balance Root and Canopy Growth. HGCA Project Report No. 402, pp. 22. London: Home-Grown Cereals Authority.Google Scholar
Blake, J. J. & Spink, J. H. (2005). Variability of rooting in oilseed rape. Aspects of Applied Biology 73, 195–198.Google Scholar
Bouttier, C. & Morgan, D. G. (1992). Ovule development and determination of seed number per pod in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 43, 709–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruns, G., Kuchenbuch, R. & Jung, J. (1990). Influence of a triazole plant growth regulator on root and shoot development and nitrogen utilisation of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 165, 257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. F., Daniels, R. W. & Scarisbrick, D. H. (1984). Field studies on 14C assimilate fixation and movement in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, A. M., Crook, M. J. & Ennos, A. R. (2001). Anchorage mechanics of the tap root system of winter sown oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Annals of Botany 87, 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, C. F., Vaidyanathan, L. V. & Hough, M. N. (1983). An analysis of the relationship between potential evapotranspiration and dry matter accumulation for winter wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, M., Jenkins, G. J., Lu, X., Turnpenny, J. R., Mitchell, T. D., Jones, R. G., Lowe, J., Murphy, J. M., Hassell, D., Boorman, P., McDonald, R. & Hill, S. (2002). Climate Change Scenarios for the United Kingdom: The UKCIP02 Scientific Report. School of Environmental Science, University of East Anglia, UK. Oxford: UKCIP.Google Scholar
Kasperbauer, M. J. & Karlen, D. L. (1986). Light-mediated bioregulation of tillering and photosynthate partitioning in wheat. Physiologia Plantarum 66, 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J., Gay, A., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Bingham, I., Foulkes, J., Gregory, P. & Robinson, D. (2004). Modelling cereal root systems for water and nitrogen capture: towards and economic optimum. Annals of Botany 91, 383–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leterme, P. (1988). Modelisation du fonctionnement du peuplement de colza d'hiver en fin de cycle: elaboration des composantes finales du rendement. In Colza: Physiologie et Elaboaration du Rendement CETIOM, pp. 124–129. Paris.Google Scholar
Lunn, G. D., Spink, J. H., Stokes, D. T., Wade, A., Clare, R. W. & Scott, R. K. (2001). Canopy Management in Winter Oilseed Rape. HGCA Project Report No. OS49. London: Home-Grown Cereals Authority.Google Scholar
Lunn, G. D., Spink, J. H., Wade, A. & Clare, R. W. (2003). Spring Remedial Treatments to Improve Canopy Structure and Yield in Oilseed Rape. HGCA Project Report No. OS64. London: Home-Grown Cereals Authority.Google Scholar
Mendham, N. J., Shipway, P. A. & Scott, R. K. (1981). The effects of delayed sowing and weather on growth, development and yield of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pechackova, S. (1999). Root response to above-ground light quality: Differences between rhizomatous and non-rhizomatous clones of Festuca rubra. Plant Ecology 141, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penning de Vries, F. W. T., Jansen, D. M., ten Berge, H. F. M. & Bakema, A. (1989). Simulation of Ecophysiological Processes of Growth in Several Annual Crops. Simulation Monographs 29. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Rademacher, W. (2000). Growth retardants: effects on gibberellin biosynthesis and other metabolic pathways. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 51, 501–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scarisbrick, D. H., Addo-Quaye, A. A., Daniels, R. W. & Mahamud, S. S. (1985). The effect of paclobutrazol on plant height and seed yield of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 105, 605–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setia, R. C., Bhathal, G. & Setia, N. (1995). Influence of paclobutrazol on growth and yield of Brassica carinata A. Br. Plant Growth Regulation 16, 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spink, J. H. & Berry, P. M. (2005). Yield of UK oilseed rape: physiological and technological constraints, and expectations of progress to 2010. In Proceedings of the 61st Easter School, pp. 311–334. Nottingham University, UK: University of Nottingham Press.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R. & Makepeace, R. J. (1984). A code for stages of development in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Aspects of Applied Biology 6, 399–419.Google Scholar
Zhou, W. & Ye, Q. (1996). Physiological and yield effects of uniconazole on winter rape (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 15, 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar