Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:09:28.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

True and apparent metabolizable energy of some indigenous feedingstuffs and finished feeds determined by modified rooster bioassay techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. N. P. Ranaweera  and
W. E. Nano
K. N. P. Ranaweera
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Industry, Poultry Research Centre, P.O. Box 73 Lae, Papua New Guinea
W. E. Nano
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Industry, Poultry Research Centre, P.O. Box 73 Lae, Papua New Guinea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The true and apparent metabolizable energy (TME and AME) of a range of indigenous feedingstuffs and finished feeds were determined by rooster bioassay techniques adapted to suit a small nutrition laboratory.

The AME and TME of some common feedingstuffs were similar to the values published elsewhere. The AME of two finished feeds were similar to their zero-N corrected metabolizable energy values determined by the conventional total collection method. The mean ±S.E. endogenous and metabolic excreta energy per bird for 24 h was 70·4 ± 2·94 kJ.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 97 , Issue 2 , October 1981 , pp. 403 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association Of Official Analytical Chemists (1975). Official Methods of Analysis. 12th ed., Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Chami, D. B., Vohra, P. & Kratzer, H. (1980). Evaluation of a method for determinaation of true metabolisable energy of feed ingredients. Poultry Science 59, 569–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, N. M. & Fuller, H. L. (1980). Additivity of True Metabolisable Energy values as measured with roosters, broiler chicks and poults. Poultry Science 59, 1941–1942.Google Scholar
Farrell, D. J. (1978). Rapid determination of metabolisable energy of foods using cockerels. British Poultry Science 19, 303–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, F. W. & Anderson, D. L. (1958). Comparison of metabolisable energy and productive energy determination with growing chicks. Journal of Nutrition 64, 587–604.Google Scholar
Hutagalung, R. I. (1977). Additives other than methionine in cassava diets. In Cassava as Animal Feed: Proceedings of a workshop held at University of Guelph (ed. Nestol, B. and Graham, M.). Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
Sibbald, I. R. (1976). A bioassay for true metabolisable energy in feedingstuff. Poultry Science 55, 303–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibbald, I. R. (1977). The effect of level of input on true metabolisable energy values. Poultry Science 56, 1662–1663.Google Scholar
Sibbald, I. R. (1979). Effects of level of feed input, dilution of test material and duration of excreta collection on true metabolisable energy values. Poultry Science 58, 1325–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibbald, I. R. (1980). The passage of oat and other residues through the adult cockerel. Poultry Science 59, 2136–2144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sibbald, I. R. & Slinger, S. J. (1963). A biological assay for M.E. in poultry ingredients together with findings which demonstrate some problems associated with evaluation of fats. Poultry Science 42, 313–318.Google Scholar
Siriwardena, J. A. De S. & Ranaweera, K. N. P. (1974). Manioc leaf meal in poultry diets. Ceylon Veterinary Journal 22, 53–57.Google Scholar