Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T16:46:02.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Triticale out-performs wheat on range of UK soils with a similar nitrogen requirement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2016

S. E. ROQUES ,
D. R. KINDRED  and
S. CLARKE
S. E. ROQUES*
Affiliation:
ADAS Boxworth, Boxworth, Cambridge CB23 4NN, UK
D. R. KINDRED
Affiliation:
ADAS Boxworth, Boxworth, Cambridge CB23 4NN, UK
S. CLARKE
Affiliation:
ADAS Gleadthorpe, Meden Vale, Mansfield, Nottingham NG20 9PD, UK
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Triticale has a reputation for performing well on poor soils, under drought and with reduced inputs, but there has been little investigation of its performance on the better yielding soils dominated by wheat production. The present paper reports 16 field experiments comparing wheat and triticale yield responses to nitrogen (N) fertilizer on high-yielding soils in the UK in harvest years 2009–2014. Each experiment included at least two wheat and at least two triticale varieties, grown at five or six N fertilizer rates from 0 to at least 260 kg N/ha. Linear plus exponential curves were fitted to describe the yield response to N and to calculate economically optimal N rates. Normal type curves with depletion were used to describe protein responses to N. Whole crop samples from selected treatments were taken prior to harvest to measure crop biomass, harvest index, crop N content and yield components. At commercial N rates, mean triticale yield was higher than the mean wheat yield at 13 out of 16 sites; the mean yield advantage of triticale was 0·53 t/ha in the first cereal position and 1·26 t/ha in the second cereal position. Optimal N requirement varied with variety at ten of the 16 sites, but there was no consistent difference between the optimal N rates of wheat and triticale. Triticale grain had lower protein content and lower specific weight than wheat grain. Triticale typically showed higher biomass and straw yields, lower harvest index and higher total N uptake than wheat. Consequently, triticale had higher N uptake efficiency and higher N use efficiency. Based on this study, current N fertilizer recommendations for triticale in the UK are too low, as are national statistics and expectations of triticale yields. The implications of these findings for arable cropping and cereals markets in the UK and Northern Europe are discussed, and the changes which would need to occur to allow triticale to fulfil a role in achieving sustainable intensification are explored.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 155 , Issue 2 , March 2017 , pp. 261 - 281
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alaru, M., Laur, Ü., Eremeev, V., Reintam, E., Selge, A. & Noormets, M. (2009). Winter triticale yield formation and quality affected by N rate, timing and splitting. Agricultural and Food Science 18, 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon (2010). Fertiliser Manual (RB209), 8th edn, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Anon (2015 a). HGCA Recommended List Winter wheat 2015/16. Stoneleigh, UK: AHDB-HGCA.Google Scholar
Anon (2015b). NIAB-TAG Seed Production Booklet: Seed Certification Statistics for England & Wales. Issue Number 84. Cambridge, UK: NIAB.Google Scholar
Bailey, R. J. & Spackman, E. (1996). A model for estimating soil moisture changes as an aid to irrigation scheduling and crop water use studies. I. Operational details and description. Soil Use and Management 12, 122–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassu, S., Asseng, S. & Richards, R. (2011). Yield benefits of triticale traits for wheat under current and future climates. Field Crops Research 124, 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beltranena, E., Salmon, D. F., Goonewardene, A. & Zijlstra, R. T. (2008). Triticale as a replacement for wheat in diets for weaned pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 88, 631–635.Google Scholar
Beres, B., Pozniak, C., Eudes, F., Graf, R., Randhawa, H., Salmon, D., Mcleod, G., Dion, Y., Irvine, B., Voldeng, H., Martin, R., Pageau, D., Comeau, A., Depauw, R., Phelps, S. & Spaner, D. (2013 a). A Canadian ethanol feedstock study to benchmark the relative performance of triticale: I. Agronomics. Agronomy Journal 105, 1695–1706.Google Scholar
Beres, B., Pozniak, C., Bressler, D., Gibreel, A., Eudes, F., Graf, R., Randhawa, H., Salmon, D., Mcleod, G., Dion, Y., Irvine, B., Voldeng, H., Martin, R., Pageau, D., Comeau, A., Depauw, R., Phelps, S. & Spaner, D. (2013 b). A Canadian ethanol feedstock study to benchmark the relative performance of triticale: II. Grain quality and ethanol production. Agronomy Journal 105, 1707–1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, P. M., Spink, J., Sterling, M. & Pickett, A. A. (2003). Methods for rapidly measuring the lodging resistance of wheat cultivars. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 189, 390–401.Google Scholar
Bithell, S. L., Butler, R. C., Harrow, S., Mckay, A. & Cromey, M. G. (2011). Susceptibility to take-all of cereal and grass species, and their effects on pathogen inoculum. Annals of Applied Biology 159, 252–266.Google Scholar
Blum, A. (2014). The abiotic stress response and adaptation of triticale - a review. Cereal Research Communications 42, 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, T. S., Olckers, R. C. & Vandermerwe, J. P. (1995). Triticale (Tritico-secale) as a substitute for maize in pig diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 53, 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carman, E. (1884). Rural topics. Rural New Yorker, 30 August 1884.Google Scholar
Clarke, S., Roques, S., Weightman, R. & Kindred, D. (2016). Modern Triticale Crops for Increased Yields, Reduced Inputs, Increased Profitability and Reduced Greenhouse Gas Emissions from UK Cereal Production. Project Report no. 556. Stoneleigh. UK: AHDB.Google Scholar
Davis-Knight, H. & Weightman, R. M. (2008). Triticale as a low input cereal for alcohol production I. Alcohol yields and processing quality of triticale varieties grown under UK conditions. Aspects of Applied Biology 90, 135–142.Google Scholar
Dennett, A. L. & Trethowan, R. M. (2013). Milling efficiency of triticale grain for commercial flour production. Journal of Cereal Science 57, 527–530.Google Scholar
Dennett, A. L., Wilkes, M. A. & Trethowan, R. M. (2013). Characteristics of modern triticale quality: the relationship between carbohydrate properties, alpha-amylase activity, and falling number. Cereal Chemistry 90, 594–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djekic, V., Mitrovic, S., Milovanovic, M., Djuric, N., Kresovic, B., Tapanarova, A., Djermanovic, V. & Mitrovic, M. (2011). Implementation of triticale in nutrition of non-ruminant animals. African Journal of Biotechnology 10, 5697–5704.Google Scholar
Dumas, J. B. A. (1831). Procedes de l'Analyse Organique. Annales de Chimie et de Physique 247, 198–213.Google Scholar
Ellen, J. (1993). Growth, yield and composition of four winter cereals. I. Biomass, grain yield and yield formation. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 41, 153–165.Google Scholar
Erekul, O. & Köhn, W. (2006). Effect of weather and soil conditions on yield components and bread-making quality of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and winter triticale (Triticosecale Wittm.) varieties in north-east Germany. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 192, 452–464.Google Scholar
Estrada-Campuzano, G., Slafer, G. A. & Miralles, D. J. (2012). Differences in yield, biomass and their components between triticale and wheat grown under contrasting water and nitrogen environments. Field Crops Research 128, 167–179.Google Scholar
European Union (EU) (2009). Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Official Journal of the European Union L140, 39–85.Google Scholar
FAO (2014). FAOSTAT. Rome, Italy: FAO.Google Scholar
Foulkes, M. J., Snape, J. W., Shearman, V. J., Reynolds, M. P., Gaju, O. & Sylvester-Bradley, R. (2007). Genetic progress in yield potential in wheat: recent advances and future prospects. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 145, 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, B. J. (1984). Design and interpretation of nitrogen response experiments. In The Nitrogen Requirements of Cereals, pp. 133–149. MAFF Reference Book 385. London, UK: HMSO.Google Scholar
Giunta, F., Pruneddu, G. & Motzo, R. (2009). Radiation interception and biomass and nitrogen accumulation in different cereal and legume species. Field Crops Research 110, 76–84.Google Scholar
Graham, R., Geytenbeek, P. & Radcliffe, B. (1983). Responses of triticale, wheat, rye and barley to nitrogen fertilizer. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 23, 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulmezoglu, N., Alpu, O. & Ozer, E. (2010). Comparative performance of triticale and wheat grains by using path analysis. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 16, 443–453.Google Scholar
Gutteridge, R. J., Hornby, D., Hollins, T. W. & Prew, R. D. (1993). Take all in autumn sown wheat, barley, triticale and rye grown with high and low inputs. Plant Pathology 42, 425–431.Google Scholar
Gutteridge, R. J., Bateman, G. L. & Todd, A. D. (2003). Variation in the effects of take-all disease on grain yield and quality of winter cereals in field experiments. Pest Management Science 59, 215–224.Google Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1984). Performance of triticale in comparison with barley and wheat in a semi-arid Mediterranean region. Experimental Agriculture 20, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermes, J. C. & Johnson, R. C. (2004). Effects of feeding various levels of triticale var. Bogo in the diet of broiler and layer chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 13, 667–672.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, J. R., Deleuran, L. C. & Wollenweber, B. (2007). Prospects of whole grain crops of wheat, rye and triticale under different fertilizer regimes for energy production. Biomass and Bioenergy 31, 308–317.Google Scholar
Josephides, C. M. (1992). Analysis of adaptation of barley, triticale, durum and bread wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Euphytica 65, 1–8.Google Scholar
Kindred, D., Verhoeven, T., Weightman, R., Swanston, J. S., Agu, R. C., Brosnan, J. & Sylvester Bradley, R. (2008). Effects of variety and fertiliser nitrogen on alcohol yield, grain yield, starch and protein content, and protein composition of winter wheat. Journal of Cereal Science 48, 46–57.Google Scholar
Kindred, D., Weightman, R., Roques, S. & Sylvester-Bradley, R. (2010). Low nitrogen input cereals for bioethanol production. Aspects of Applied Biology 101, 37–44.Google Scholar
Kindred, D. R. & Sylvester-Bradley, R. (2010). Routes to reducing the N requirements of high yielding wheat crops. Aspects of Applied Biology 105, 97–106.Google Scholar
Kliseviciute, V., Gruzauskas, R., Grashorn, M. A., Raceviciute-Stupeliene, A., Sasyte, V., Svirmickas, G. J. & Bliznikas, S. (2014). Effect of different supplementation levels of whole Triticale grown in Lithuania to broiler diets on performance and parameters of functioning of the digestive tract. European Poultry Science 78.Google Scholar
Korver, D. R., Zuidhof, M. J. & Lawes, K. R. (2004). Performance characteristics and economic comparison of broiler chickens fed wheat- and triticale-based diets. Poultry Science 83, 716–725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGoverin, C. M., Snyders, F., Muller, N., Botes, W., Fox, G. & Manley, M. (2011). A review of triticale uses and the effect of growth environment on grain quality. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 91, 1155–1165.Google Scholar
Motzo, R., Pruneddu, G. & Giunta, F. (2013). The role of stomatal conductance for water and radiation use efficiency of durum wheat and triticale in a Mediterranean environment. European Journal of Agronomy 44, 87–97.Google Scholar
Murray, A. W. A. & Nunn, P. A. (1987). A non-linear function to describe the response of % nitrogen in grain to applied nitrogen fertiliser. Aspects of Applied Biology 15, 219–225.Google Scholar
Nix, J. (2014). John Nix Farm Management Pocketbook, 45th edn 2015, Melton Mowbray, UK: Agro Business Consultants Ltd.Google Scholar
Obuchowski, W., Banaszak, Z., Makowska, A. & Luczak, M. (2010). Factors affecting usefulness of triticale grain for bioethanol production. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 90, 2506–2511.Google Scholar
Overthrow, R. & Carver, M. F. (2003). The Value of Triticale in the 2nd/3rd Cereal Position in Crop Sequences . HGCA Project Report No. 306. London, UK: HGCA.Google Scholar
Snyder, C. S., Bruulsema, T. W., Jensen, T. L. & Fixen, P. E. (2009). Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 133, 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R. & Kindred, D. R. (2009). Analysing nitrogen responses of cereals to prioritise routes to the improvement of nitrogen use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany 60, 1939–1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R., Kindred, D., Wynn, S., Thorman, R. & Smith, K. E. (2014). Efficiencies of nitrogen fertilizers for winter cereal production, with implications for greenhouse gas intensities of grain. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 152, 3–22.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R., Kindred, D., Berry, P. M., Storer, K., Kendall, S. & Welham, S. (2015). Development of Appropriate Testing Methodology for Assessing Nitrogen Requirements of Wheat and Oilseed Rape Varieties. Final Report to Defra Project IF01110. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, B. L. (2011). Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 20260–20264.Google Scholar
Villegas, D., Casadesús, J., Atienza, S. G., Martos, V., Maalouf, F., Karam, F., Aranjuelo, I. & Nogués, S. (2010). Tritordeum, wheat and triticale yield components under multi-local Mediterranean drought conditions. Field Crops Research 116, 68–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weightman, R. M. & Davis-Knight, H. (2008). Triticale as a low input cereal for alcohol production II. Potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions relative to bioethanol from wheat. Aspects of Applied Biology 90, 135–142.Google Scholar
Weightman, R., Kindred, D. & Clarke, S. (2011). Cereals for Bioethanol: Quantifying the Alcohol Yield of UK Hard Wheats, and the Grain Yields and N Requirements of Triticale in the Second Cereal Position. HGCA Project Report No. 478. Stoneleigh, UK: HGCA.Google Scholar
Widodo, A. E., Nolan, J. V. & Iji, P. A. (2015). The nutritional value of new varieties of high-yielding triticale: feeding value of triticale for broiler chickens. South African Journal of Animal Science 45, 74–81.Google Scholar
Winzeler, M., McCullough, D. E. & Hunt, L. A. (1989). Leaf gas exchange and plant growth of winter rye, triticale, and wheat under contrasting temperature regimes. Crop Science 29, 1256–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar