Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-07T04:28:42.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The transfer of maternal dietary riboflavin to the embryo during development in the common fowl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. O. Brown
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Northern Ireland and The Queen's University of Belfast

Extract

In this paper a detailed examination of the rate of transfer of riboflavin to the embryo during incubation is reported.

Confirmatory evidence of the direct effect of egg content of riboflavin on subsequent growth of the chick is supported by liver analyses for riboflavin. Changes in the liver content after hatching show that after 10 days on a low riboflavin diet reserves of chicks reach a minimal level irrespective of original egg content.

The data for the rate of transfer of riboflavin to the embryo show a direct relationship between the amount reaching the embryo and the initial content of the egg. Evidence is presented of a large rate of transfer at the most critical period of development, which is at 14–15 days as judged by embryonic mortality in riboflavin deficiency. In eggs containing low levels of the vitamin a relatively small amount of the vitamin reaches the embryo at this critical 15-day stage.

The time required for hens on a low dietary level of riboflavin to reach maximal egg levels is shown to be of the order of three weeks.

The utilization by the embryo of riboflavin injected into the egg is studied quantitatively. The injected vitamin is as fully utilized by the embryo as is riboflavin deposited at egg formation.

Qualitative chromatographic separation of the flavines of fertile eggs during incubation shows a gradual increase in combined forms as development proceeds.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bolton, W. (1948). J. Agric. Sci. 37, 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, W. (1951). Rep. IXth World's Poultry Congress, 2, 27.Google Scholar
Booth, V. (1935). Biochem. J. 29, 1743.Google Scholar
Brown, W. O. (1950). J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 1, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burch, H. B., Bessey, O. A. & Lowry, O. H. (1948). J. Biol. Chem. 175, 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, R. & Cumber, F. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 46, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crammer, J. L. (1948). Nature, Lond., 161, 349.Google Scholar
Cravens, W. W. & Snell, E. E. (1949). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 71, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, H. J., Norris, L. C. & Heuser, G. F. (1938 a). Poultry Sci. 17, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, H. J., Norris, L. C. & Heuser, G. F. (1938 b). Poultry Sci. 17, 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decker, L. E. & Byerrum, R. U. (1954). J. Nutr. 53, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, R. W., Phillips, P. H. & Halpin, J. G. (1940). Poult. Sci. 19, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpin, J. G., Holmes, C. E. & Hart, E. B. (1933). Bull. Wis. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 425, 18.Google Scholar
Kodicek, E. & Wang, Y. L. (1949). Biochem. J. 44, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepkovsky, S. & Jukes, T. H. (1935). Science, 82, 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepkovsky, S., Taylor, L. W., Jukes, T. H. & Almquist, H. J. (1938). Hilgardia, 11, no. 10.Google Scholar
Norris, L. C., Wilgus, H. S., Ringrose, A. T., Heiman, V. & Heuser, G. F. (1936). Btill. Cornell Agric. Sta. no. 660.Google Scholar
Pearson, P. B., Melass, V. H. & Sherwood, R. M. (1945). Arch. Biochem. 7, 353.Google Scholar
Romanoff, A. L. & Bauernfeind, J. C. (1942). Anat. Rec. 82, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, A. E. & Heuser, G. F. (1939). Poult. Sci. 18, 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, E. E. & Quarles, E. (1941). J. Nutr. 22, 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warkany, J. & Nelson, R. C. (1942). J. Nutr. 23, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar