Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:43:18.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Study of gas production capacity by three sources of inocula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

L. M. B. O. Gonçalves  and
A. E. S. Borba
L. M. B. O. Gonçalves
Affiliation:
University of the Azores, Departament of Agrarian Sciences, Animal Nutrition, 9700 Angra do Heroismo, Azores, Portugal
A. E. S. Borba
Affiliation:
University of the Azores, Departament of Agrarian Sciences, Animal Nutrition, 9700 Angra do Heroismo, Azores, Portugal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The capacity for gas production by three sources of inocula was evaluated at the University of the Azores between 1993 and 1994. The sources were: liquor from the rumen of sheep and slaughtered cattle and a suspension of sheep faeces. The highest gas production was observed in the liquor obtained from sheep rumen. Lower production(p ≤ 0·05) was observed in the rumen liquor obtained from slaughtered cattle, and the lowest results (p ≤ 0·05) were obtained with the suspension of faeces from sheep.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 127 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 511 - 515
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

El Shaer, H. M., Omed, H. M., Chamberlain, A. G. & Axford, R. F. E. (1987). Use of faecal organisms from sheep for the in vitro determination of digestibility. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109, 257–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khazaal, K., Dentinho, M. T., Ribeiro, J. M. & Ørskov, E. R. (1993). A comparison of gas production during incubation with rumen contents in vitro and nylon bag degradability as predictors of the apparent digestibility in ivivo and the voluntary intake of hays. Animal Production 57, 105–112.Google Scholar
McDonald, I. (1981). A revised model for the estimation of protein degradability in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 251–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menke, K. H., Raab, L., Salewski, A., Steingass, H., Fritz, D. & Schneider, W. (1979). The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolić, J. A., Jovanović, M. & Zeremski, D. (1987). Application of a modified in vitro procedure in the prediction of organic matter digestibility of feedstuffs for ruminants. Acta Veterinaria (Beograd) 37, 3–12.Google Scholar
Omed, H. M., Axford, R. F. E., Chamberlain, A. G. & Givens, D. I. (1989). A comparison of three laboratory techniques for the estimation of the digestibility of feedstuffs for ruminants. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 113,35–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & McDonald, I. (1979). The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1980). Principles and Procedures of Statistics, 2nd Edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar