Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T20:39:53.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the leaching of urea in sodic soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Balwinder Singh  and
M. S. Bajwa
Balwinder Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Soils, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
M. S. Bajwa
Affiliation:
Department of Soils, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Laboratory experiments were conducted in PVC columns to study the leaching and transformation of applied urea in sodic soils (Gharachon loam-Aquic Natrustalf and Domeli silty clay loam-Aquic Camborthid) reclaimed by gypsum application and kept submerged for 7 or 14 days after fertilizer application. The effect of different depths of irrigation water (5, 7·5, 10, 20 and 30 cm) on urea leaching was studied in a sandy loam sodic soil. In another experiment, the effect of time interval (0 or 4 days) between urea application and initiation of submergence with distilled water (for 7 or 14 days) was investigated involving two recently reclaimed sodic soils (Gharachon loam and Domeli silty clay loam). The results showed that the extent of urea leaching mainly depended upon soil texture. In Domeli silty clay loam, urea penetrated to 20 cm depth with peaks in concentration at 12·5 cm at both 7 and 14 days of submergence. In Gharachon loam urea-N moved to 25 cm depth after 7 days and to 35 cm after 14 days. In the sandy loam sodic soil peaks of urea-N concentration were observed at 12·5, 22·5 and 27·5 cm depths after infiltration of 5, 7·5 and 10 cm depth of water, respectively. Leaching with 20 and 30 cm depths of water moved urea deeper (below 50 and 70 cm, respectively). In recently reclaimed soils, leaching initiated immediately after fertilizer application displaced urea to slightly deeper layers compared with leaching initiated 4 days after urea application. Leaching may not be an important loss mechanism of urea-N in loam or silty clay loam sodic soils. However, in light-textured sandy loam sodic soils leaching beyond the root zone can be expected to create fertilizer management problems.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 106 , Issue 2 , April 1986 , pp. 323 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beri, V., Brar, S. S., Sekhon, G. S. & Ghuman, B. S. (1978). Extent of urea leaching in soils and its biochemical control. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 26, 116–124.Google Scholar
Black, C. A. (1965). Methods of Soil Analysis. Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.: American Society of Agronomy Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J. M. & Keeney, D. R. (1966). Determination and isotope ratio analysis of different forms of nitrogen in soils. Exchangeable ammonium, nitrate and nitrite by extraction-distillation methods. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 30, 577–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, F. E., Hill, G. N. & Tyler, K. B. (1958). Transformations and movement of urea in soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 22, 303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassel, D. R. (1971). Water and solute movement in seva loam for two water management regimes. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 31, 497–501.Google Scholar
Craswell, E. T. & Vlek, P. L. G. (1979). Fate of fertilizer N applied to wetland rice. In Nitrogen and Rice, pp. 175–192. The International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Klstiakowsky, G. B. & Senberg, A. J. (1952). The kinetics of urea hydrolysis by urease. Journal of the American Chemical Society 74, 5020–5025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puri, A. N. (1930). A new method of estimating total carbonates in soils. Imperial Agricultural Research Pussa Bulletin 206, 7 pp.Google Scholar
Rao, D. L. N. & Batra, L. (1983). Ammonia volatilization from applied nitrogen in alkali soils. Plant and Soil 70, 219–228.Google Scholar
Richard, L. A. (1954). Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. U.S.D.A. Handbook No. 60.Google Scholar
Singh, R. & Nye, P. H. (1984). The effect of soil pH and high urea concentration on uroase activity in soil. Journal of Soil Science 35, 519–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, M., Yadav, D. S. & Kumar, V. (1984). Leaching and transformation of urea in dry and wet soils as affected by irrigation water. Plant and Soil 81, 411–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkley, A. & Black, I. A. (1934). An estimation of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, G. W. & Chbisp, J. D. (1954). Spectrophotometric method for determination of urea. Analytical Chemistry 26, 452–453.Google Scholar
Yadav, J. S. P. (1980). Efficiency of fertilizer used in saline and alkali soil for crop production. Fertilizer News 25 (9), 19–27.Google Scholar
Zantua, M. I. & Bremnbr, J. M. (1975). Preservation of soil samples for assay of urease activity. Sotl Biology and Biochemistry 7, 297–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar