Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T03:27:19.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the habits of zebu cattle. III. Water consumption of Zebu cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. H. L. Rollinson ,
K. W. Harker  and
J. I. Taylor
D. H. L. Rollinson
Affiliation:
Animal Health Research Centre, Entebbe, Uganda
K. W. Harker
Affiliation:
Animal Health Research Centre, Entebbe, Uganda
J. I. Taylor
Affiliation:
Animal Health Research Centre, Entebbe, Uganda
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In continuation of a series of studies on the habits of Zebu cattle, records for the quantities of water consumed every hour by ten cattle during twenty periods of 24 hr. observations have been analysed.

A large variation in day-to-day consumption was evident, but water was taken on an average during 8 hr. of the day with only a small amount of water consumed during darkness. The mean consumption per animal per 24 hr. period was 9·04 kg. (1·9 gal.). The range was 5·1–12·7 kg. (1·1–2·8 gal.).

The water consumption records were subdivided into those days on which water was drunk during a small number of hours and those days when water was drunk during many hours. Although the hourly consumption differed markedly the end result showed a similar intake.

A significant negative relationship was found between water consumed and grazing counts, and for one group a significant positive correlation was found between water consumption and dry air temperature.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , June 1955 , pp. 123 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bonsma, J. C. (1949). J. Agric. Sci. 19, 204.Google Scholar
Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and Growth. New York: Rheinhold Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Brody, S. (1954). Abstr. p. 96, 49th Ann. Meeting Amer. Dairy Sci. Assn. J. Dairy Sci. 37, 674.Google Scholar
Bunge, V. A. & Williams, E. (1949). Agricultural station, Serere. Unpublished results.Google Scholar
Castle, M. E. & Halley, R. J. (1953). Brit. J. Anim. Behav. 1, 139.Google Scholar
Clark, R. & Quin, J. I. (1947). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 22, 335.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. D. (1950). Bull. Hannah Dairy Res. Inst. no. 9.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. D. (1953). N.A.A.S. Quart.Rev. no. 19, 285.Google Scholar
Findlay, J. D. & Yang, S. H. (1950). J. Agric. Sci. 40, 126.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. B., Braman, W. W., Kriss, M. & Swift, R. W. (1931 a). J. Agric. Res. 43, 1003.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. B., Braman, W. W., Kriss, M. & Swift, R. W. (1931 b). J. Agric. Res. 43, 1015.Google Scholar
Forbes, E. B., Fries, J. A., Braman, W. W. & Kriss, M. (1926). J. Agric. Res. 33, 579.Google Scholar
French, M. H. (1939). Ann. Rep. Dep. Vet. Sci. Tanganyika, pt. II, 1938. Dar es Salaam: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1949). Proc. U.N.E.S.C.O. Conference, New York, 6, 414.Google Scholar
Harker, K. W., Taylor, J. I. & Rollinson, D. H. L. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, H. G. & Mabon, R. H. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kibler, H. H. & Brody, S. (1953). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 522. (Anim. Breed. Abstr. 1954, 22, 448.)Google Scholar
Leitch, I. & Thomson, J. B. (1944). Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 14, 197.Google Scholar
Morrison, E. B. (1937). Feeds and Feeding, 20th edn. p. 632.Google Scholar
Mullick, D. N., Murty, V. N. & Kehar, N. D. (1952). J. Anim. Sci. 11, 42.Google Scholar
Ragsdale, A. C., Thompson, H. J., Worstell, D. M. & Brody, S. (1950). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 460. (Anim. Breed. Abstr. 1951, 10, 1630.)Google Scholar
Ragsdale, A. C., Thompson, H. J., Worstell, D. M. & Brody, S. (1953). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 521. (Anim. Breed. Abstr. 1954, 22, 451.)Google Scholar
Regan, W. M. & Richardson, G. A. (1938). J. Dairy Sci. 21, 73.Google Scholar
Rhoad, A. G. (1940). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 8, 190.Google Scholar
Rieck, R. F. & Lee, D. H. K. (1948). J. Dairy Res. 15, 219.Google Scholar
Rollinson, D. H. L. & Bredon, R. M. (1953). Animal Health Research Centre, Entebbe. Unpublished results.Google Scholar
Rupel, I. W. (1929). Bull. Wis. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 404. Quoted by Leitch & Thomson, 1944.Google Scholar
Seath, D. M. & Miller, E. A. (1946). J. Dairy Sci. 29, 465.Google Scholar
Bull. Storrs Agric. Exp. Sta. (1936). No. 214. Quoted by Leitch & Thomson.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. I., Rollinson, D. H. L. & Harker, K. W. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 45, 257.Google Scholar
Thompson, H. J., Worstell, D. M. & Brody, S. (1949). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 436. (Anim. Breed. Abstr. 19.)Google Scholar
Woodward, J. E. & McNulty, J. B. (1931). Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 278.Google Scholar