Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T02:19:10.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial modelling of soil organic carbon stocks with combined principal component analysis and geographically weighted regression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2018

Long Guo ,
Mei Luo ,
Chengsi Zhangyang ,
Chen Zeng ,
Shanqin Wang  and
Haitao Zhang
Long Guo
Affiliation:
College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Mei Luo
Affiliation:
College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Chengsi Zhangyang
Affiliation:
College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Chen Zeng
Affiliation:
College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Shanqin Wang
Affiliation:
College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Haitao Zhang*
Affiliation:
College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Author for correspondence: Haitao Zhang, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With the development of remote sensing and geostatistical technology, complex environmental variables are increasingly easily quantified and applied in modelling soil organic carbon (SOC). However, this emphasizes data redundancy and multicollinearity problems adding to the difficulty in selecting dominant influential auxiliary variables and uncertainty in estimating SOC stocks. The current paper considers the spatial characteristics of SOC density (SOCD) to construct prediction models of SOCD on the basis of reducing the data dimensionality and complexity using the principal component analysis (PCA) method. A total of 260 topsoil samples were collected from Chahe town, China. Eight environmental variables (elevation, aspect, slope, normalized difference vegetation index, normalized difference moisture index, nearest distance to construction area and road, and land use degree comprehensive index) were pre-analysed by PCA and then extracted as the main principal component variables to construct prediction models. Two geostatistical approaches (ordinary kriging and ordinary co-kriging) and two regression approaches (ordinary least squares and geographically weighted regression (GWR)) were used to estimate SOCD. Results showed that PCA played an important role in reducing the redundancy and multicollinearity of the auxiliary variables and GWR achieved the highest prediction accuracy in these four models. GWR considered not only the spatial characteristics of SOCD but also the related valuable information of the auxiliary attributes. In summary, PCA-GWR is a promising spatial method used here to predict SOC stocks.

Keywords

Data dimensionalitydimensionality reductiongeostatistical approachessoil organic carbonspatial variation
Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 156 , Issue 6 , August 2018 , pp. 774 - 784
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brunsdon, C, Fotheringham, S and Charlton, M (1998) Geographically weighted regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician) 47, 431–443.Google Scholar
Conforti, M, Castrignano, A, Robustelli, G, Scarciglia, F, Stelluti, M and Buttafuoco, G (2015) Laboratory-based Vis-NIR spectroscopy and partial least square regression with spatially correlated errors for predicting spatial variation of soil organic matter content. Catena 124, 60–67.Google Scholar
Deckers, JA, Nachtergaele, F and Spaargaren, OC (1998) World Reference Base for Soil Resources: Introduction. Leuven, Belgium: Acco.Google Scholar
De Groot, P, Postma, G, Melssen, W and Buydens, L (1999) Selecting a representative training set for the classification of demolition waste using remote NIR sensing. Analytica Chimica Acta 392, 67–75.Google Scholar
Evrendilek, F, Celik, I and Kilic, S (2004) Changes in soil organic carbon and other physical soil properties along adjacent Mediterranean forest, grassland, and cropland ecosystems in Turkey. Journal of Arid Environments 59, 743–752.Google Scholar
Fotheringham, AS, Brunsdon, C and Charlton, M (2002) Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships. New York, USA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Guo, L, Zhao, C, Zhang, H, Chen, Y, Linderman, M, Zhang, Q and Liu, Y (2017) Comparisons of spatial and non-spatial models for predicting soil carbon content based on visible and near-infrared spectral technology. Geoderma 285, 280–292.Google Scholar
Harris, P, Fotheringham, A, Crespo, R and Charlton, M (2010) The use of geographically weighted regression for spatial prediction: an evaluation of models using simulated data sets. Mathematical Geosciences 42, 657–680.Google Scholar
Jeyabharathi, D and Suruliandi, A (2013) Performance analysis of feature extraction and classification techniques in CBIR. In 2013 International Conference on Circuits, Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, pp. 1211–1214.Google Scholar
Jobbágy, EG and Jackson, RB (2000) The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecological Applications 10, 423–436.Google Scholar
Johnson, RA and Wichern, DW (2002) Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Keser, S, Duzgun, S and Aksoy, A (2012) Application of spatial and non-spatial data analysis in determination of the factors that impact municipal solid waste generation rates in Turkey. Waste Management 32, 359–371.Google Scholar
Kumar, S, Lal, R and Liu, D (2012a) A geographically weighted regression kriging approach for mapping soil organic carbon stock. Geoderma 189–190, 627–634.Google Scholar
Kumar, S, Lal, R and Lloyd, CD (2012b) Assessing spatial variability in soil characteristics with geographically weighted principal components analysis. Computational Geosciences 16, 827–835.Google Scholar
Kumar, S, Lal, R, Liu, DS and Rafiq, R (2013) Estimating the spatial distribution of organic carbon density for the soils of Ohio, USA. Journal of Geographical Sciences 23, 280–296.Google Scholar
Lal, R (2003) Global potential of soil carbon sequestration to mitigate the greenhouse effect. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 22, 151–184.Google Scholar
Liu, Y, Wang, C, Yue, WZ and Hu, YY (2013) Storage and density of soil organic carbon in urban topsoil of hilly cities: a case study of Chongqing Municipality of China. Chinese Geographical Science 23, 26–34.Google Scholar
Liu, Y, Guo, L, Jiang, Q, Zhang, H and Chen, Y (2015) Comparing geospatial techniques to predict SOC stocks. Soil and Tillage Research 148, 46–58.Google Scholar
Mishra, U, Lal, R, Liu, D and Van Meirvenne, M (2010) Predicting the spatial variation of the soil organic carbon pool at a regional scale. Soil Science Society of America Journal 74, 906–914.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Colmenero, M, Bienes, R, Eldridge, D and Marques, M (2013) Vegetation cover reduces erosion and enhances soil organic carbon in a vineyard in the central Spain. Catena 104, 153–160.Google Scholar
Shi, X, Yu, D, Warner, E, Sun, W, Petersen, G, Gong, Z and Lin, H (2006) Cross-reference system for translating between genetic soil classification of China and soil taxonomy. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70, 78–83.Google Scholar
Shubin, S (2006) The changing nature of rurality and rural studies in Russia. Journal of Rural Studies 22, 422–440.Google Scholar
Six, J, Paustian, K, Elliott, E and Combrink, C (2000) Soil structure and organic matter I. Distribution of aggregate-size classes and aggregate-associated carbon. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64, 681–689.Google Scholar
Song, X-D, Brus, DJ, Liu, F, Li, D-C, Zhao, Y-G, Yang, J-L and Zhang, G-L (2016) Mapping soil organic carbon content by geographically weighted regression: a case study in the Heihe River Basin, China. Geoderma 261, 11–22.Google Scholar
Sun, W, Zhu, YQ, Huang, SL and Guo, CX (2015) Mapping the mean annual precipitation of China using local interpolation techniques. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 119, 171–180.Google Scholar
Viscarra Rossel, RA and McBratney, AB (1998) Soil chemical analytical accuracy and costs: implications from precision agriculture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38, 765–775.Google Scholar
Wang, S-Y, Liu, J-Y, Zhang, Z-X, Zhou, Q-B and Zhao, X-L (2001) Analysis on spatial-temporal features of land use in China. Acta Geographica Sinica 6, 631–639.Google Scholar
Wang, JL, Kang, SZ, Sun, JS and Chen, ZF (2013 a) Estimation of crop water requirement based on principal component analysis and geographically weighted regression. Chinese Science Bulletin 58, 3371–3379.Google Scholar
Wang, K, Zhang, C and Li, W (2013 b) Predictive mapping of soil total nitrogen at a regional scale: a comparison between geographically weighted regression and cokriging. Applied Geography 42, 73–85.Google Scholar
Wilding, LG (1985) Spatial variability: its documentation, accommodation and implication to soil surveys. In Nielsen, DR and Bouma, J (eds), Soil Spatial Variability. Workshop. Proceedings of a Workshop of the ISSS and the SSA, Las Vegas. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Pudoc, pp. 166–194.Google Scholar
Wilson, EH and Sader, SA (2002) Detection of forest harvest type using multiple dates of Landsat TM imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 80, 385–396.Google Scholar
Wu, H, Guo, Z and Peng, C (2003) Land use induced changes of organic carbon storage in soils of China. Global Change Biology 9, 305–315.Google Scholar
Yimer, F, Ledin, S and Abdelkadir, A (2006) Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks as affected by topographic aspect and vegetation in the Bale Mountains, Ethiopia. Geoderma 135, 335–344.Google Scholar
Zhan, C, Cao, J, Han, Y, Huang, S, Tu, X, Ping, W and An, Z (2013) Spatial distributions and sequestrations of organic carbon and black carbon in soils from the Chinese Loess Plateau. Science of the Total Environment 465, 255–266.Google Scholar
Zhang, C, Tang, Y, Xu, X and Kiely, G (2011) Towards spatial geochemical modelling: use of geographically weighted regression for mapping soil organic carbon contents in Ireland. Applied Geochemistry 26, 1239–1248.Google Scholar
Zhi, J-J, Jing, C-W, Zhang, C, Wu, J-P, Ni, Z-H, Chen, H-J and Xu, J (2013) Estimation of soil organic carbon density and storage in Zhejiang Province of East China by using 1:50000 soil database. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao (Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology) 24, 683–689.Google Scholar
Zhuang, D-F and Liu, J-Y (1997) Study on the model of regional differentiation of land use degree in China. Zi Ran Zi Yuan Xue Bao (Journal of Natural Resources) 12, 105–111.Google Scholar