Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:31:33.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soluble and slow-release nitrogen fertilizer effects on grass forage, as influenced by rate and placement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. E. Allen ,
G. L. Terman  and
C. M. Hunt
S. E. Allen
Affiliation:
National Fertilizer Development Centre, Tennessee Valley Authority, Muscle Shoals, Alabama, U.S.A.
G. L. Terman
Affiliation:
National Fertilizer Development Centre, Tennessee Valley Authority, Muscle Shoals, Alabama, U.S.A.
C. M. Hunt
Affiliation:
National Fertilizer Development Centre, Tennessee Valley Authority, Muscle Shoals, Alabama, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Soluble ammonium nitrate (AN) and urea were compared with slow-release oxamide and sulphur-coated urea (SCU) as N sources for clipped annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) or common bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) in four greenhouse experiments. Mixed and surface applications of a wide range of N rates were evaluated for 9 to 14 cuttings of grass forage. Both granular oxamide and SCU exhibited slow-release N properties, especially when surface-applied. Uptake distribution of N with high application rates of AN and urea tended to resemble that with the slow-release sources. Slow-release properties of oxamide and SCU were accentuated at high application rates. Lower N recovery from surface-applied urea than from AN indicated volatilization loss of urea N. Volatilization loss also occurred with oxamide, but low N recovery from oxamide and SCU resulted largely from incomplete dissolution of the granules during the 18- to 34-week experimental periods. Very low N recovery was obtained from urea formaldehyde having an activity index of 42.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 77 , Issue 3 , December 1971 , pp. 397 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, S. E., Mays, D. A., & Terman, G. L. (1968). Sulfur-coated urea: an effective slow-release nitrogen fertilizer. Crops Soila 21 (3), 13–15.Google Scholar
Allen, S. B., Hunt, C.M. & Terman, G. L. (1971). Nitrogen release from sulfur-coated urea, as affected by coating weight, placement, and temperature. Agron. J. 63, 529–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J. M. (1965). In Methods of Analysis, part 2, p. 1164. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
DeMent, J. D., Hunt, C. M. & Stanford, G. (1961). Hydrolysis, nitrification, and nitrogen availability of oxamide, as influenced by granule size. J. agric. Fd Chem. 9, 453–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelstad, O. P., Hunt, C. M. & Terman, G. L. (1964). Response of corn to nitrogen in oxamide and ammonium nitrate in greenhouse experiments. Agron. J. 56, 579–82.Google Scholar
Mays, D. A. (1970). Sulphur-coated urea: a slow-release nitrogen source for grass. Proc. 11th int Grassld Congr., Queensland, pp. 428–30.Google Scholar
Mays, D. A. & Terman, G. L. (1969a). Sulfur-coated urea and uncoated soluble nitrogen fertilizers for fescue forage. Agron. J. 61, 489–92.Google Scholar
Mays, D. A. & Terman, G. L. (1969b). Response of Coastal bermuda grass to nitrogen in sulfur-coated urea, urea and ammonium nitrate. Sulphur Inst. J. 5 (Autumn), 7–10.Google Scholar
Rindt, D. W., Blouin, G. M. & Getsinger, J. G. (1968). Sulfur-coating on nitrogen fertilizers to reduce dissolution rate. J. agric. Fd Chem. 16, 773–8.Google Scholar
Terman, G. L., Allen, S. E. & Clements, L. B. (1966). Greenhouse techniques for soil-plant-fertilizer research. TVA Report No. T66–4SF. 63 pp. Muscle Shoals, Alabama.Google Scholar