Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:46:43.053Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soils in relation to marsh spot of pea seed1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Basil S. Furneaux  and
H. H. Glasscock
Basil S. Furneaux
Affiliation:
(South Eastern Agricultural College, Wye, Kent)
H. H. Glasscock
Affiliation:
(South Eastern Agricultural College, Wye, Kent)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. An account is given of Marsh Spot in the seeds of the green pea (Pisum sativum L.); its economic importance and its effect on the plant, including the germination of the seed, are discussed.

2. Hypotheses advanced by seedsmen and growers to account for the presence of Marsh Spot are discussed.

3. The soils of 165 fields upon which green peas were grown under contract for seed in east Kent during 1933 and 1934, were surveyed in detail and are classified under the American system. A brief description of each is given.

4. The occurrence of Marsh Spot is correlated with the presence of a water table in the soil. A high percentage of Marsh Spot was encountered only in crops grown on fields with a water table within 52 in. of the surface. Thus, in the presence of a water table, the intensity of Marsh Spot reached a maximum of 100 per cent. of the seeds of a sample affected, whereas in the absence of a water table the maximum was only 3 per cent.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , January 1936 , pp. 59 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Lacey, M. S.Ann. appl. Biol. (1934), 211, 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Grieve, B. J.Ann. appl. Biol. (1934), 21, 636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Pethybridge, G. H.J. Minist. Agric. (1934), 41, 833.Google Scholar
(4)Bruijn, H. L. G. De.Tijdschr. PlZiekt. (1933), 39, 281.Google Scholar
(5)Wade, B. L. and Zaumeyer, W.J. Phytopathology (1934), 24, 1384.Google Scholar
(6)Lee, L. L.J. Minist. Agric. (1930), 37, 653.Google Scholar
(7)Lee, L. L.J. S.-E. agric. Coll. Wye (1931), 28, 65.Google Scholar
(8)Hall, A. D. and Russell, E. J.A Report on the Agriculture and Soils of Kent, Surrey and Sussex (1911). London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
(9)Gilbert, C. J.Archaeol. Cantiana (1933), 45, 246.Google Scholar
(10)Cole, L. W. and Dubey, J. K.J. S.-E. agric. Coll. Wye (1932), 30, 141–65.Google Scholar
(11)Furneaux, B. S.J. S.-E. agric. Coll. Wye (1932), 30, 123.Google Scholar
(12)Bane, W. A. and Gethtn Jones, G. H.Bull. Minist. Agric. (1934), No. 80.Google Scholar
(13)Brade-Birks, S. G. and Furneaux, B. S.J. S.-E. agric. Coll. Wye (1930), 27, 252.Google Scholar
(14)Van Der Lek, H. A. A.Tijdschr. PlZiekt. (1918), 24, 102.Google Scholar
(15)Niklas, H., Poschenrieder, H. and Trischler, J.Ernähr. Pfl. (1930), 26, 5, pp. 97.Google Scholar