Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:10:53.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Soil Solution and the Mineral Constituents of the Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Alfred Daniel Hall
Affiliation:
(From the Rothamsted Experimental Station.)
Winifred Elsie Brenchley
Affiliation:
(From the Rothamsted Experimental Station.)
Lilian Marion Underwood
Affiliation:
(From the Rothamsted Experimental Station.)

Extract

Solutions were made by extracting the soils from certain of the Rothamsted plots on which wheat and barley had been grown for 60 years and upwards. Wheat and barley were grown in these solutions, which were renewed fortnightly. The comparative growth in the solutions was closely parallel to the growth of the crop on the plots in the field and corresponded to the composition of the solutions. The composition of the solutions as regards phosphoric acid and potash corresponded to the past manurial treatment of the soils and to the amount of phosphoric acid and potash they now show on analysis. Growth in the soil solutions agreed with the growth in artificial culture solutions containing equivalent amounts of phosphoric acid and potash. Growth in the soil solutions from imperfectly manured plots was brought up to the level of that in the solutions from completely manured plots on making up their deficiencies in phosphoric acid and potash by the addition of suitable salts. The phosphoric acid and potash content of the soil solutions was of the same order as the phosphoric acid and potash content of the natural drainage water from the same plots.

Wheat grew as well as barley in the solutions of the wheat soils, and vice versâ. In a similar set of solutions from the same soils the growth of buckwheat, white lupins and sunflowers corresponded with that of wheat and barley. Boiling effected no alteration in the nutritive value of the soil solutions.

In nutritive solutions of various degrees of dilution the growth of plants varied directly, but not proportionally, with the concentration of the solution, though the total plant food present in the solution was in excess of the requirements of the plant. When the nutrient solution was diffused as a film over sand or soil particles, as in nature, there was no retardation of growth due to the slowness of the diffusion of the nutrients to the points in the liquid film which had been exhausted by contact with the roots. Growth in such nutrient solutions forming a film over sand particles was much superior to the growth in a water culture of equal concentration, but the growth in the water culture was similarly increased if a continuous current of air was kept passing through it.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 278 note 1 Phil. Trans. 1845, p. 240.

page 278 note 2 Chem. Soc. Trans. 1894, Vol. XCV. p. 115.Google Scholar

page 278 note 3 Whitney and Cameron, Bull. 22, 1903, Bureau of Soils, U.S. Dept. of Agric.

page 278 note 4 Journ. Pltys. Chem. 1910, Vol. XIV. p. 320.Google Scholar

page 279 note 1 Whitney and Cameron, loc. cit. p. 46.

page 279 note 2 Cameron, loc. cit.. p. 351.

page 280 note 1 Text-Book of Botany, English ed., 1875, p. 625.

page 291 note 1 Binner, and Lucanus, , Landw. Versuchs.-Stat. 1866, Vol. VIII. p. 128; Cameron, loc. cit., p. 403.Google Scholar

page 292 note 1 Thanks are due to the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society for the loan of the blocks for Figs. 2, 3, 4 and 6.

page 295 note 1 See also Pouget, and Chouchak, , Compt. Rend.. 1912, Vol. 154, p. 1709.Google Scholar

page 295 note 2 Bureau of Soils, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bull. 50, 1908.