Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:43:18.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sensitivity analyses of the ARCWHEAT1 crop model: the effect of changes in radiation and temperature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Z. Kocabas ,
R. A. C. Mitchell ,
J. Craigon  and
J. N. Perry
Z. Kocabas
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leics LE12 5RD, UK
R. A. C. Mitchell
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK
J. Craigon
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leics LE12 5RD, UK
J. N. Perry
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The sensitivity of predicted final grain yield to changes in the mean and variance of daily temperature and daily log(radiation) was studied for the arcwheat1 crop model of winter wheat. These two climatic variables were each simulated by each of two stochastic models, the parameters of which were estimated from 12 years' data from Rothamsted Experimental Station.

When arcwheat1 was run with systematic changes in daily temperature from – 2 °C to +2 °C in steps of 0·1 °C, there were abrupt changes in predicted final grain yield which coincided with predicted increases in leaf number. These effects were smoothed out when the stochastic climate models incorporating simulated daily variation were used as inputs, in multiple runs of arcwheat1.

In such runs, the response of predicted yield to changes in the means of temperature and log(radiation) was studied both for individual developmental stages and over the entire growing season. Yield was insensitive to changes in temperature and radiation during the stage between sowing and emergence, and to changes in radiation before terminal spikelet formation.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 120 , Issue 2 , April 1993 , pp. 149 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, R. M., Rosenzweig, C., Peart, R. M., Ritchie, J. T., McCarl, B. A., Glyer, J. D., Curry, R. B., Jones, J. W., Boote, K. J. & Allen, L. H. Jr (1990). Global climate change and US agriculture. Nature 345, 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. K., Gallagher, J. N. & Monteith, J. L. (1980). Daylength change and leaf appearance in winter wheat. Plant, Cell and Environment 3, 285–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, P. (1976). Fourier Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bratley, P., Fox, B. L. & Schrage, L. E. (1983). A Guide to Simulation. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormack, R. M. (1988). Statistical challenges in the en-vironmental sciences: a seasonal view. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A 151, 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dlggle, P. J. (1990). Time Series: A Biostatistical Intro-duction. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elston, D. A. (1990). An Introduction to Mathematical Modelling, Course Notes. Scottish Agricultural Statistics Service, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Havens, P. L. & Fontaine, D. D. (1991). An introduction to sensitivity analysis. Aspects of Applied Biology 26, 135–149.Google Scholar
Hay, R. K. M. & Walker, J. (1989). An Introduction to the Physiology of Crop Yield. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Jamieson, P. D., Porter, J. R. & Wilson, D. R. (1991). A test of the computer simulation model arcwheati on wheat crops grown in New Zealand. Field Crops Research 27, 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffers, J. N. R. (1988). SCOPE34, Practitioner's Handbook on the Modelling of Dynamic Changes in Ecosystems. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Parry, M. (1990). Climate Changes and World Agriculture. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W. & Members of the Genstat 5 Committee of Statistics Department of Rothamsted Experimental Station (1987). Genstat 5 Reference Manual, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, J. R. (1984) A model of canopy development in winter wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 383–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, C. W. (1981). Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation. Water Resources Research 17, 182–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, R. E. (1975). System Simulation: The Art and Science. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Travis, K. Z., Day, W. & Porter, J. R. (1988). Modelling the timing of the early development of winter wheat. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 44, 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, A. H., Bragg, P. L., Porter, J. R. & Rayner, J. H. (1984). A winter wheat crop simulation model without water or nutrient limitations. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar