Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:13:26.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seed-bed cultivations and sugar-beet seedling emergence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. J. Gummerson
Affiliation:
Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP28 6NP

Summary

Experiments are described in which a range of seed beds was created in each of 5 years. The weather in these years produced wet, dry and capping seed-bed conditions. The time course of sugar-beet seedling emergence on each seed bed was recorded each year and the differences were considered in terms of soil physical characteristics: much of the year-to-year variation was accounted for by considering thermal time above 3 °C. The differences in emergence between seed beds were large only when conditions were dry, but in all years it was advantageous to level the seed bed in autumn or winter. Seed beds with a dense soil below the seed and fine aggregates above gave the most suitable conditions for rapid and successful emergence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aura, E. (1975). Effects of soil moisture on the germination and emergence of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Journal of the Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 47, 170.Google Scholar
Durrant, M. J. (1980). Plant establishment in 1980. British Sugar Beet Review 48, (4), 710.Google Scholar
Durrant, M. J., Jaggard, K. W. & Scott, R. K. (1984). Meeting the challenge for sugar beet: magnitude and origin of the problem and possible solutions. Aspects of Applied Biology 7, 85102.Google Scholar
Fawcett, R. G. & Collis-George, N. (1967). A filter-paper method for determining the moisture characteristics of soil. Australian Journal of Experimental Agricultural and Animal Husbandry 7, 162167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gummerson, R. J. (1986). The effect of constant temperatures and osmotic potentials on the germination of sugar beet. Journal of Experimental Botany 37, 729741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadas, A. & Russo, D. (1974). Water uptake by seeds as affected by water stress, capillary conductivity and seed-soil water contact. II. Analysis of experimental data. Agronomy Journal 66, 647652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakansson, I. & Von Polgar, J. (1979). Effects on seedling emergence of soil slaking and crusting. The 8th conference of the International Soil Tillage Research Organization, Bundesrepublik Deutschland.Google Scholar
Hamblin, A. P. (1981). Filter-paper method for routine measurement of field water potential. Journal of Hydrology 53, 355360.Google Scholar
Hegarty, T. W. & Royle, S. M. (1977). Portable loadtransducer penetrometer for soil strength studies. Laboratory Practice 26, 2930.Google Scholar
Hegarty, T. W. & Royle, S. M. (1978). Soil impedance as a factor reducing crop seedling emergence and its relation to soil conditions at sowing and to applied water. Journal of Applied Ecology 15, 897904.Google Scholar
Jaggard, K. W. (1977). Effects of soil density on yield and fertilizer requirement of sugar beet. Annals of Applied Biology 86, 301312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggard, K. W. (1979). Effect of plant distribution on the yield of sugar beet. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Jaggard, K. W., Wickens, R., Webb, D. J. & Scott, R. K. (1983). Effects of sowing date on plant establishment and bolting and the influence of these factors on yields of sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 147161.Google Scholar
Owers, A. C. & Clare, R. W. (1975). Problems of seedbed preparation. British Sugar Beet Review, 42, 911.Google Scholar
Simmonds, L. P. (1983). Soil aeration and seedling establishment. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Sperlingsson, C. (1981). The influence of the seed bed soil physical environment on seedling growth and establishment. In Proceedings of the 44th Winter Congress of the International Institute for Sugar Beet Research, Brussels, pp. 5977.Google Scholar