Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:59:45.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonal variations in semen characteristics of sheep in the subtropics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. S. E. Hafez ,
A. L. Badreldin  and
Y. H. Darwish
E. S. E. Hafez
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Cairo, Egypt
A. L. Badreldin
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Cairo, Egypt
Y. H. Darwish
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Cairo, Egypt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Semen samples were collected from twelve fattailed rams of two breeds (nine Ossimi and three Rahmani), by the use of an artificial vagina. They were kept under natural conditions at Cairo, Egypt (30° N.). Three collections were made each month throughout one year (1951–2).

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , February 1955 , pp. 283 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackerknecht, E. B. (1950). Z. Tierz. ZüchtBiol. 58, 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. (1945). The Semen of Animals and Its Use in Artificial Insemination, pp. 1–23. Imp. Bur. Anim. Breed, and Gen.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (1949). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Badreldin, A. L., Hafez, E. S. E. & Darwish, Y. H. (1954). 1st. Int. Congr. Photobiology (Amsterdam) (in the Press).Google Scholar
Baker, J. R. (1938). Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 108 A, 557.Google Scholar
Berliner, V. & Warbritton, V. (1937). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod., 30th Ann. Meet. p. 137.Google Scholar
Bogart, R. & Mayer, D. T. (1946). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 402.Google Scholar
Branton, C. & Salisbury, G. W. (1947). J. Anim. Sci. 6, 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, W. W. (1940). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod., 33rd Ann. Meet. p. 207.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. M. C. (1936). Bull. Coun. Sci. Indust. Res. Aust. no. 94.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. M. C. (1948). Pastoral. Rev. 58, 1159.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. M. C., Sanders, R. N. & Granger, W. (1942). Bull. Coun. Sci. Indust. Res. Aust. no. 148.Google Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E. (1952). J. Agric. Sci. 42, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. (1938). Trans. Yorks. Agric. Soc. 95, 11.Google Scholar
Kappeli, J. (1908). Landw. Jb. Schweiz. 22, 53.Google Scholar
Lardy, H. A. & Phillips, P. H. (1939). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod., 32nd Ann. Meet. p. 219.Google Scholar
Maqsood, M. (1951). Experientia (Basel), 7, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, D. T., Squires, D. & Bogart, R. (1947). J. Anim. Sci. 6, 499 (Abstract).Google Scholar
McKenzie, F. F. & Berliner, V. (1937). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 265.Google Scholar
Mounib, M. (1953). Personal communication, Anim. Prod. Dept. Alexandria University.Google Scholar
Oloufa, M. M. (1953). Res. Bull. Cairo Univ. Faculty Agric. no. 26.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. W. & McKenzie, F. F. (1934). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 217.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. W., Schott, R. G., Eaton, O. N. & Simmons, V. L. (1943). Cornell Vet. 33, 227.Google Scholar
Starke, N. C. (1949). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 22, 415.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1946). Statistical Methods Applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M. (1949). J. Agric. Sci. 39, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar