Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:54:11.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonal variation in the reproductive capacity of the bull

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. Anderson
J. Anderson
Affiliation:
Experimental Station, Naivasha, Kenya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Seasonal variation in the reproductive capacity of the bull was studied during a 27-month experimental period at the Experimental Station. There are a total of 1049 ejaculates for this period. Supplementary data for other periods on the Experimental Station and for two other large farms practising artificial insemination are also included.

Highly significant individual and monthly differences were noted during the experimental period for the density and motility of the sperm, the pH of the semen and for the percentage of ejaculations performed. The seasonal variation in semen is marked, but there is considerable variation in different years between bulls and between farms in the periods of maximal and minimal types of semen and in seasonal trends.

The relationship between such variation and climatic and nutritional conditions is discussed. There appears to be a basic seasonal rhythm in bull semen associated with climatic factors, warmer conditions causing stimulation and vice versa. Nutritional factors may, however, modify this rhythm. The relationship between seasonal variations in semen quality and fertility is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , July 1945 , pp. 184 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. (1936). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 4, 186, 197.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (1937). East Afr. Agric. J.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (1939). Vet. J. 95, 457.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (1940). Vet. J. 96, 18.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (1941). Vet. Rec. 53, 197.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (1943 a). J. Agric. Sci. 34, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. (1943 b). J. Agric. Sci. 34, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erb, R. E., Andrews, F. N. & Hilton, J. H. (1942). J. Dairy Sci. 25, 815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erb, R. E., Wilbur, J. W. & Hilton, J. H. (1940). J. Dairy Sci. 23, 549.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. M. C., Sanders, R. N. & Granger, W. (1942). Bull. Coun. Sci. Industr. Res., Aust., no. 148.Google Scholar
McKenzie, F. F. & Berliner, V. (1937). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta., no. 265.Google Scholar
Moore, C. R. (1939). ‘Biology of the testes’: in Sex and Internal Secretions by Allen, Danforth and Doisy, 2nd ed.Baltimore, U.S.A.: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Quinlan, J. & Riemerschmid, G. (1941). Onderstepoort J. Vet. Sci. 16, 299; and 17, 123.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1938). Statistical Methods. Inc. Ames, Iowa: Collegiate Press.Google Scholar
Walton, A. (1936, 2nd Ed. 1942). Notes on the Artificial Insemination of Sheep, Cattle and Horses. London: Holborn Surgical Instrument Co.Google Scholar