Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:51:49.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Results from barley experiments comparing aqueous ammonia and aqueous urea with ammonium nitrate, and also liquid with granular NPK fertilizers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

F. V. Widdowson ,
A. Penny  and
R. C. Flint
F. V. Widdowson
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
A. Penny
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
R. C. Flint
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In 14 experiments made from 1968 to 1970 yields of, percentages of N in and amounts of N removed by the grain were compared: (1) when N was injected, either as aqueous ammonia (with or without a combine-drilled ‘starter’ dose of N) or as aqueous urea, or when broadcast as ammonium nitrate (‘Nitro-Chalk 21’) and: (2) when comparable liquid (14–6–8) and granular (20–10–10) NPK compound fertilizers were applied, either over the seed bed (sprayed or broadcast), or combine-drilled. All were applied to give 63 or 126kgN/ha.

Barley yields were increased significantly more by combine-drilled than by broadcast PK (0–20–20) fertilizer, especially when only 32 kg P2O5 and K2O/ha was given. N was better combine-drilled than broadcast when 63 kg/ha was given, but not with 126 kg/ha. Soil analyses suggested a limiting value for P.

Yields and N recoveries were largest when one-fifth of the N was combine-drilled (as 6–15–15) and the remainder injected as aqueous ammonia in bands 30 cm apart and 12 cm deep. Injecting all the N, either as aqueous ammonia or as urea, gave yields a little smaller than this, but still larger than from broadcasting ammonium nitrate.

The liquid NPK fertilizer gave smaller yields than the granular one in the two dry springs (1968 and 1969), but similar yields in the cool wet one (1970), both when applied over the seed bed and when combine-drilled. The smaller yields with the liquid fertilizer were associated with a severe check and loss of plant when it was combinedrilled (presumably caused by urea) and poorer growth after it was sprayed (presumably through loss of N to the air and greater dispersal of P in the soil). The single amount of each fertilizer increased yields more when combine-drilled than when broadcast, but not the double amount, which, especially as liquid, was safer when surface-applied. Effects of site and season upon mean yields were large.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 79 , Issue 2 , October 1972 , pp. 349 - 361
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cooke, G. W. (1962). Liquid fertilisers. J. Inst. Corn agric. Merch. 10 (4), 19–21.Google Scholar
Huack, R. D. & Russell, D. A. (1969). Fluid fertilisers for direct application in the United States. Outl. Agric. 6 (1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, A. J. & Pipek, F. J. (1970). The ammoniflcation and nitrification in soil of urea with and without biuret. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 75, 301–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feed and Farm Supplies (1970). Broadcasting Compared With Drilling, August, p. 22.Google Scholar
Fertiliser Manufacturers' Association Ltd. (1971). Consumption of liquid fertilisers. Fertiliser Statistics, 1970, p. 7.Google Scholar
Mundy, E. J. (1966). Comparison of liquid and solid N P and K fertilisers for barley. Expl Husb. No. 14 51–4.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V. & Penny, A. (1970). Anhydrous ammonia – yields and recoveries by spring wheat. Proceedings of a Symposium on Anhydrous Ammonia, pp. 61–6. National College of Agricultural Engineering, Silsoe, Bedford.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A. & Flint, B. C. (1970). Anhydrous and aqueous ammonia as fertilisers. Rep. Rothamsted exp. Stnfor 1969, pp. 42–3.Google Scholar