Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T21:03:58.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of wheat cultivars to dates of sowing under dryland conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. De
Affiliation:
Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi – 110 012, India
G. Saran
Affiliation:
Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi – 110 012, India
B. B. Turkhede
Affiliation:
Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi – 110 012, India
R. B. Lal
Affiliation:
Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi – 110 012, India
R. K. Singh
Affiliation:
Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi – 110 012, India
G. Giri
Affiliation:
Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi – 110 012, India

Summary

Field experiments made for 4 years between 1976–7 and 1979–80 in a semi-arid environment of north-west India showed that the productivity of dryland unirrigated wheat can be increased considerably by adjusting the date of sowing to conducive atmospheric temperatures. Sowing in the middle of November when daily mean temperatures ranged between 19 and 21 °C produced yields ranging between 2·6and 3·5t/ha (averaged over the 4 years) compared with 1·4–3·3 t/ha obtained from the crop sown by mid-October when the daily mean temperature ranged between 24 and 26 °C. The tall cultivar C 306, a derivative of winter x spring wheat cross, could withstand sowing at higher temperatures (mid-October) more than the spring wheats. High temperatures prevailing during the seedling stage of spring wheats shortened their vegetative growth and initiated early differentiation. Night temperatures above 13 °C coupled with day temperatures of 33–35 °C in the last fortnight of October adversely affected the tillering of spring wheats sown on 15 October and produced smaller spikes with few fertile spikelets.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bains, S. S., Chaudhary, S. L. & Turkhede, B. B. (1971). Profit potential of cropa in dryland. Indian Farming 3 (2), 1215.Google Scholar
Bhabdwaj, R. B. L. (1978). New agronomic practices. In Wheat Research in India 1966–76 (ed. Jaiswal, P. L.), pp. 7998. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
Chaturvedi, G. S., Aggakwal, P. K., Singh, A. K. & Sinha, S. K. (1981). Effect of irrigation on tillering in wheat, triticale and barley in a water limited environment. Irrigation Science 2, 225235.Google Scholar
De, R. (1974). Development of agronomic practices for unfavourable rainfall areas. Proceedings, 1st FAO/ SIDA Seminar on Improvement and Production of Field Food Crops for Plant Scientists from Africa and the Near East, pp. 495504. Rome: F.A.O.Google Scholar
Evans, L. T., Wardlaw, I. F. & Fischer, R. A. (1975). Wheat. In Crop Physiology (ed. Evans, L. T.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Midmore, D. J., Cartwright, P. M. & Fischer, R. A. (1982). Wheat in tropical environments. 1. Phasic development and spike size. Field Crops Research 5, 185200.Google Scholar
Wall, P. C. & Cartwright, P. M. (1974). Effect of photoperiod, temperature and vernalization on the phenology and spikelet numbers of spring wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 76, 299301.Google Scholar