Response by sugar beet to potassium and sodium fertilizers, particularly in relation to soils containing little exchangeable potassium

Summary

Twenty experiments between 1970 and 1974 tested the effect of spring applications of all combinations of five amounts of potassium (0–333 kg K/ha) and two amounts of sodium (0, 150 kg Na/ha) on sugar-beet yield, profitability and the amount of K and Na in the crop in mid-summer. The experiments were in commercial sugar-beet crops where soils contained little exchangeable potassium, most having less than 100 mg K/l in top soil. On average, sugar yield was greatest when 150 kg Na/ha plus 167 kg K was used, the fertilizer increasing yield by 0·71 t/ha. Response to this combination of K and Na fertilizers was 1·45, 0·57 and 0·22 t sugar/ha when the soil contained less than 60, 61–120 and more than 120 mg K/l respectively.

From results of earlier experiments, it was thought that response to even a large amount of K without Na would be less than to Na without K because usually there is insufficient rainfall in the spring for maximum response to K. In fact, 333 kg K/ha increased yield by about the same amount as Na, probably because a large proportion of these experiments were made in wetter-than-average springs.

The concentration of K in dried tops and roots in mid-summer increased linearly with soils containing from 40 to 120 mg K/l but when there was more K in the soil the concentration of K in the plants did not increase further. By contrast, the concentration of Na in plants did not reach a similar plateau. Whole plants in mid-summer contained between 128 and 251 kg K/ha and 42–102 kg Na/ha, depending on the fertilizer treatment. Recovery of applied K varied from 90% when small amounts were used on fields containing least K to about 20% when large amounts were given on fields containing moderate amounts. Recovery of Na varied from about 50 to 23%.

The comparison of the financial return from using K alone or K plus Na showed that Na was essential for maximum profit. On average, the most profitable dressing of K gave a return of £14/ha whereas K plus Na gave up to £46/ha. On fields with least K, the corresponding results were £50 and £115/ha respectively. In relation to soil K, the most profitable application was 150 kg Na/ha plus about 150 kg K/ha on soils with 60 mg K/l or less, and 150 kg Na/ha plus about 75 kg K/ha on most other soils.