Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:10:59.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Residual effects of phosphorus applied to soyabean or wheat in a soyabean–wheat cropping system on a typic haplustert

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. Subba Rao ,
K. Sammi Reddy  and
P. N. Takkar
A. Subba Rao
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Soil Science, Z-6, Zone-1, Maharana Pratap Nagar, Bhopal – 462 011, India
K. Sammi Reddy
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Soil Science, Z-6, Zone-1, Maharana Pratap Nagar, Bhopal – 462 011, India
P. N. Takkar
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Soil Science, Z-6, Zone-1, Maharana Pratap Nagar, Bhopal – 462 011, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

During a 3-year experimental period (between 1992 and 1995), residual effects on yields of subsequent crops of phosphorus applied either to soyabean or wheat, and on recoveries of the added P and changes in the available P, were studied in a soyabean–wheat cropping system on a typic haplustert very low in available P at Bhopal, India. Phosphorus was applied at rates of 0–52 kg P ha-1 (five treatments) to soyabean and 0–39 kg P ha-1 (three treatments) to wheat during the first year, and in the subsequent years the residual effects were studied in relation to fresh applications of 39 kg P ha-1 to each crop. The yields of soyabean and wheat were increased significantly by the application of P to each crop. Phosphorus applied to soyabean showed residual effects in two succeeding crops, whereas P applied to wheat showed a residual effect in only one succeeding crop. Phosphorus applied to soyabean was more efficiently utilized by the succeeding crops compared to that applied to wheat in the rotation. The recoveries of added P were greater with smaller rates of added P and greater in the first two residual crops. Olsen P in soil was adequate only in the first year and it fell below the critical limit in the subsequent two cycles of cropping. Cumulative P uptake by crops determined the levels of available P in the soil and soil test values declined with increase in cumulative P uptake over time.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 127 , Issue 3 , November 1996 , pp. 325 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bolland, M. D. A. (1992). Residual value of superphosphate measured using yields of different pasture legume species and bicarbonate-extractable soil phosphorus. Fertilizer Research 31, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolland, M. D. A. & Barrow, N. J. (1991). The effect of level of application on the residual value of superphosphate on a sandy soil in south-western Australia. Fertilizer Research 29, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. E. (1965). Phosphorus fertilizer residual effects on irrigated crops in rotation. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 29, 67–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, B. N. & Roquib, M. A. (1977). Soybean Research 1967–75. Research Bulletin No. 3. Bidhan Chandra Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, West Bengal, India.Google Scholar
Dwivedi, A. K., Sinha, S. B. & Mahajan, J. P. (1985). Utilization of fertilizer phosphorus by soyabean as influenced by phosphorus fertilization in deep black soils of Madhya Pradesh. Journal of Nuclear Agriculture and Biology 14, 62–64.Google Scholar
Gupta, G. P., Sinha, B. K., Bapat, P. N. & Mahere, D. P. (1986). Soils of Madhya Pradesh. Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidhyalaya, Jabalpur.Google Scholar
Halvorson, A. D. & Black, A. L. (1985). Long-term dryland crop responses to residual phosphorus fertilizer. Soil Science Society of America Journal 49, 928–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanway, J. J. & Heidel, H. (1952). Soil analysis methods as used in Iowa state college soil testing laboratory. Bulletin lowa State College of Agriculture 57, pp. 131.Google Scholar
Havlin, J. L., Westfall, D. G. & Golus, H. M. (1984). Six years of phosphorus and potssium fertilization of irrigated alfalfa on calcareous soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48, 331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holford, I. C. R. & Crocker, G. J. (1991). Residual effects of phosphate fertilizers in relation to phosphate sorptivities of 27 soils. Fertilizer Research 28, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. & Riley, J. P. (1962). A modified single solution method for determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 27, 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S. & Dean, L. A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. United States Department of Agriculture Circular No. 939.Google Scholar
Prasad, R. & Power, J. F. (1994). Balanced fertilization and sustainable agriculture in the wake of recent policy changes. In Proceedings of Seminar on Challenges of Liberalization in the Fertilizer and Agriculture Sectors, pp. SIII/4 (1–12). New Delhi: Fertilizer Association of India.Google Scholar
Shailaja, S. & Sahrawat, K. L. (1990). Adsorption and desorption of phosphate in some semi-arid tropical Indian Vertisols. Fertilizer Research 23, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, R. R., Touchton, J. T., Boswell, F. C. & Hargrove, W. L. (1984). Effect of applied and residual P on double-cropped wheat and soybean under conservation tillage management. Agronomy Journal 76, 31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subba Rao, A. & Ganeshamurthy, A. N. (1994). Soyabean responses to applied phosphorus and sulphur on Vertic Ustochrepts in relation to available phosphorus and sulphur. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 42, 606–610.Google Scholar
Subbiah, B. V. & Asija, G. L. (1956). A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science 26, 259–261.Google Scholar