Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:26:31.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The relative performance of inbreds and open-pollinated populations of spring-sown onions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. D. Dowker
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF
J. F. M. Fennell
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF

Summary

First (I1), second (I2) and third-generation (I3) inbreds were compared with openpollinated spring-sown onion populations in field trials at five sites over 2 years. The open-pollinated populations were earlier maturing and gave higher yields and a lower proportion of bullnecked plants than the inbreds but the latter had a lower proportion of unmarketable double bulbs. The mean level of expression of each character differed considerably between individual trials. The effect on sprouting within each year resulted from factors operating prior to storage; bulbs from all sites were stored at Wellesbourne in a common environment yet large differences in the proportion of sprouted bulbs from different sites occurred by the following spring.

Interactions were found between the type of population (inbred and open-pollinated) and the macro-environment. Inbred populations showed a greater linear response to environment for yield, skin colour and proportion of bullnecked plants, but were less responsive for percentage of double bulbs.

The results are discussed in relation to the evaluation procedures for inbreds.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dowker, B. D. & Fennell, J. F. M. (1973). Onions. Report of National Vegetable Research Station for 1972. p. 27.Google Scholar
Dowker, B. D., Jackson, J. C. & Phelps, K. (1978). Variation studies in carrots as an aid to breeding. VI. Genotype-environment interactions in contrasting field environments. Journal of Horticultural Science 53, 131137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowker, B. D. & Mead, R. (1969). Yield comparisons in onion variety trials. Journal of Horticultural Science 44, 155162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, H. A. & Mann, L. K. (1963). Onions and their Allies. London: Leonard Hill.Google Scholar
Perkins, J. M. & Jinks, J. L. (1968). Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. III. Multiple lines and crosses. Heredity 23, 339356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, W. G. & Hough, K. (1973). Autumn sown onions for ware bulb production in the U.K. Journal of National Institute of Agricultural Botany 13, 4149.Google Scholar