Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:46:52.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Proportion of cross-bred and selfed seed obtained from successive generations of winter bean (Vicia faba L.) crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. A. Bond
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge
M. Pope
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge

Summary

The proportions of cross-bred and selfed seed were estimated in up to four consecutive generations of Throws MS winter beans on three farms where farm-saved seed was regularly used.

Within one stock the percentage of cross-breds rose a significant amount from 31 to 46, whilst in another stock no change was detected over four consecutive generations. On the third farm a change of stock mid-way through the period of the survey was associated with a highly significant increase in proportion of cross-breds.

In general a rise in outcrossing was not followed by a significant fall as would be expected if cross-breds have a greater tendency than inbreds to self pollinate, but the possible role of a regulatory mechanism is discussed as are implications of the range in outcrossing within stocks for variety trials and commercial production of winter beans.

Estimates of outcrossing frequency made in two crops in 1983 were slightly lower than some obtained in 1974–6 but no lower than those reported in 1951 thus providing no evidence of any long-term change in levels of natural cross-breeding in field beans in England.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bond, D. A. (1966). Yield and components of yield in diallel crosses between inbred lines of winter beans (Vicia faba). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 67, 235237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, D. A. (1986). Yield stability of composite populations and inbred lines of winter beans (Vicia faba L.). Biologische Zentralblatt 105, 129135.Google Scholar
Bond, D. A. & Pope, M. (1974). Factors affecting the proportions of cross-bred and selfed seed obtained from field bean (Vicia faba L.) crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 343351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drayner, J. M. (1956). Regulation of outbreeding in field beans (Vicia faba). Nature 177, 489490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drayner, J. M. (1959). Self- and cross-fertility in field beans (Vicia faba Linn.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 53, 387403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fyfe, J. L. & Bailey, N. T. J. (1951). Plant breeding studies in leguminous crops. I. Natural cross breeding in winter beans. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 41, 371378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, P. & Boulter, D. (1979). The use of seed isoenzymes as an aid to the breeding of field beans (Vicia faba). New Phytologist 83, 783791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, A. S. & Lawes, D. A. (1967). Studies on pollination and fertilization in the field bean (Vicia faba). Annals of Applied Biology 59, 289296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, J. H. W. & Bond, D. A. (1960). Studies on the breeding system of the field bean (Vicia faba L.). Heredity 15, 175192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picard, J. (1960). Données sur I'amé1ioration de la févèrole de printemps, Vicia faba L. Annales de l'Amélioration dea Plantes, 1960 II, 121123.Google Scholar
Poulsen, M. H. (1979). Performance of inbred populations and lines of Vicia faba L. ssp. minor. In Some Current Research on Vicia Faba in Western Europe (ed. Bond, D. A., Scarascia-Mugnozza, G. T. and Poulsen, M. H.), pp. 342354, EEC Seminar Bari 1978 (EUK 6244 EN).Google Scholar
Poulsen, M. H. (1980). Inbreeding and autofertility in Vicia faba L. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
Stoddard, F. L. (1985). Fertilization in Vicia faba in relation to breeding objectives. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar