Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:23:12.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The progeny testing of dairy bulls: a comparison of special station and field results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Alan Robertson
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh
I. L. Mason
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, Edinburgh

Extract

1. A comparison has been made between progeny tests in special stations and those available from field records. The variation between sires in milk yield is much greater at the stations even when they are compared with herds at the same production level.

2. In respect of yield the repeatability of station tests in the field is not good. The regression of field results on station test is only about 0·2 in herds at all production levels. For fat percentage, the regression is 0·5.

3. The tests in special stations (averaging seventeen daughters per bull) were compared with those in high herds (average twenty-seven daughters) in their accuracy of prediction of the performance of bulls in the poorer herds. The field test was slightly (but not significantly) better for both milk yield and fat content.

4. In milk yield, there is undoubtedly some extra variation between progeny groups at the stations which is not repeated in the field. Perhaps the tying of the heifers in distinct daughter groups in the byre may be a cause of this. However, even without this, it is doubted whether the test stations can give as much useful information on the numerical aspects of performance as the field records usually available. It is suggested that the splitting of daughter groups within the byre might increase the accuracy of the special station in the assessment of yield.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Afkomsprøver med tyke, I–VI (19471952). Beretning fra Forsogslaboratoriel, København, nos. 226, 229, 236, 245, 254 and 257.Google Scholar
British Oil and Cake Mills, Ltd. (1954). Final Report 1st Bull Progeny Test, 34 pp.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. (1954). Scot. Agric. 34, 61.Google Scholar
Johansson, I. (1954). Z. Tierz. ZüchtBiol. 63, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, I. & Hansson, A. (1940). K. Lantbr Akad. Tidskr. Specialhqfte, 3, 127 pp.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L. (1953). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. 1952, p. 106.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L. & Robertson, A. (1956). J. Agric. Sci. 47, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milk Marketing Board (1954). Production Division Rep. 5, 78.Google Scholar