Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-23T21:11:59.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prediction of intake and digestion in ruminants by a model of rumen kinetics integrating animal size and plant characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. W. Illius  and
I. J. Gordon
A. W. Illius
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK
I. J. Gordon
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RF, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Simulation modelling was used to investigate interactions between forage degradation characteristics, rumen processes and body weight, and to predict the voluntary food intake and digestion of a range of forages. Predicted voluntary intake and digestion agreed well with empirical data, explaining 61 and 70%, respectively, of variance in observed values. Since the data covered a wide range of animal weights and forage qualities, these results suggest that the model is a useful means of integrating the effects of animal and forage variables. Interactions were examined between animal weight and diet quality, as defined by the proportion of potentially digestible cell contents and cell walls and their rates of digestion. Retention time of food in the digestive tract was shown by regression to scale with W0·27. The time taken to comminute large fibre particles also scaled with W0·27. Longer retention of digesta by large ruminants increases digestive efficiency compared with small animals and would permit them to survive on lower-quality foods. The model showed that maximum intake of metabolizable energy scales with c. W0·87, greater than the scaling of maintenance with W0·73.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 116 , Issue 1 , February 1991 , pp. 145 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Allen, M. S. & Mertens, D. R. (1988). Evaluating constraints on fibre digestion by rumen microbes. Journal of Nutrition 118, 261–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, K. L. (1971). Methods of measuring the energy metabolism of animals and interpretation of results obtained. Federation Proceedings 20, 1436–1443.Google Scholar
Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and Growth. New York: Reinhold.Google Scholar
Chai, K., Milligan, L. P. & Mathison, G. W. (1988). Effect of muzzling on rumination in sheep. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 68, 387–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. J. (1927). Comparative Physiology of the Heart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Czerkawski, J. W. (1976). Chemical composition of microbial matter in the rumen. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 27, 621–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demment, M. J. (1983). Feeding ecology and the evolution of body size of baboons. African Journal of Ecology 21, 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demment, M. W. & Van Soest, P. J. (1985). A nutritional explanation for body-size patterns of ruminant and nonruminant herbivores. American Naturalist 125, 641–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhanoa, M. S. (1988). On the analysis of dacron bag data for low degradability feeds. Grass and Forage Science 43, 441–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. & Doyle, P. T. (1984). A comparison of particulate markers for the estimation of digesta flow from the abomasum of sheep offered chopped oaten hay. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35, 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R., Walker, D. J., Nader, C. J. & Storer, G. (1975). Comparative aspects of digestion of four roughages by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 909–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J., Beever, D. E. & Black, J. L. (1981). Prediction of the fractional rate of outflow of water from the rumen of sheep. Agricultural Systems 6, 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foose, T. M. (1982). Trophic strategies of ruminant versus nonruminant ungulates. PhD thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. (1980). A model of the short-term control of feeding in the ruminant: effects of changing animal or feed characteristics. Appetite 1, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, C. W., Elliott, R. & Maynard, P. J. (1987). The effect of chlorite delignification on digestibility of some grass forages and on intake and rumen microbial activity in sheep fed barley straw. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilchrist, W. (1984). Statistical Modelling. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hogan, J. P. & Weston, R. H. (1969). The digestion of pasture plants by sheep. III. The digestion of forage oats varying in maturity and in content of protein and soluble carbohydrate. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 20, 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovell, F. D. DeB., Ngambi, J. W. W., Barber, W. P. & Kyle, D. J. (1986). The voluntary intake of hay by sheep in relation to its degradability in the rumen as measured in nylon bags. Animal Production 42, 111–118.Google Scholar
Illius, A. W. & Gordon, I. J. (1987). The allometry of food intake in grazing ruminants. Journal of Animal Ecology 56, 989–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, A. (1984). Effects of feeding frequency and level of food intake on chemical composition of rumen bacteria. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R. N. B., Engelhardt, W. V. & White, R. G. (1980). The digestive physiology of wild ruminants. In Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants (Eds Ruckebusch, Y. & Thivend, P.), pp. 743–762. Proceedings of the Vth International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology, 1979. Lancaster: MTP Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyle, D. J. & Hovell, F. D. DeB. (1987). The effect of grinding of a sample on the loss of material from nylon bags incubated in the rumen of sheep. Animal Production 44, 496 (abstract).Google Scholar
Lee, J. A. & Pearce, G. R. (1984). The effectiveness of chewing during eating on particle size reduction of roughages by cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35, 609–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahlooji, M., Ellis, W. C., Matis, J. H. & Pond, K. R. (1984). Rumen microbial digestion of fiber as a stochastic process. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64, 114–115. Suppl.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathers, J. C. & Aitchison, E. M. (1981). Direct estimation of the extent of contamination of food residues by microbial matter after incubation within synthetic fibre bags in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 691–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathers, J. C. & Miller, E. L. (1981). Quantitative studies of food protein degradation and the energetic efficiency of microbial synthesis in the rumen of sheep given chopped lucerne and rolled barley. British Journal of Nutrition 45, 587–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mertens, D. R. (1977). Dietary fiber components: relationship to the rate and extent of ruminal digestion. Federation Proceedings 36, 187–192.Google Scholar
Mertens, D. R. & Ely, L. O. (1982). Relationship of rate and extent of digestion to forage utilization – a dynamic model evaluation. Journal of Animal Science 54, 895–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negi, S. S., Singh, B. & Makkar, H. P. S. (1988). An approach to the determination of rumen degradability of nitrogen in low-grade roughages and partition of nitrogen therein. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 111, 487–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Reid, G. W. & Kay, M. (1988). Prediction of intake by cattle from degradation characteristics of roughages. Animal Production 46, 29–35.Google Scholar
Peters, R. H. (1983). The Ecological Implications of Body Size. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Playne, M. J., Khumnualthong, W. & Echevarria, M. G. (1978). Factors affecting the digestion of oesophageal fistula samples and hay samples in nylon bags in the rumen of cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pond, K. R., Ellis, W. C. & Akin, D. E. (1984). Ingestive mastication and fragmentation of forages. Journal of Animal Science 58, 1567–1574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poppi, D. P., Minson, D. J. & Ternouth, J. H. (1981 a). Studies of cattle and sheep eating leaf and stem fractions of grasses. I. The voluntary intake, digestibility and retention time in the reticulo-rumen. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poppi, D. P., Minson, D. J. & Ternouth, J. H. (1981 b). Studies of cattle and sheep eating leaf and stem fractions of grasses. II. Factors controlling the retention of feed in the reticulo-rumen. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poppi, D. P., Minson, D. J. & Ternouth, J. H. (1981 c). Studies of cattle and sheep eating leaf and stem fractions of grasses. III. The retention time in the rumen of large feed particles. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renecker, L. A. & Hudson, R. J. (1990). Digestive kinetics of moose (Alces alces), wapiti (Cervus elaphus) and cattle. Animal Production 50, 51–62.Google Scholar
Smith, L. W., Goering, H. K. & Gordon, C. H. (1972). Relationships of forage compositions with rates of cell wall digestion and indigestibility of cell walls. Journal of Dairy Science 55, 1140–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalinger, D. E., Robbins, C. T. & Hanley, T. A. (1986). The assessment of handling time in ruminants: the effect of plant chemical and physical structure on the rate of breakdown of plant particles in the rumen of mule deer and elk. Canadian Journal of Zoology 64, 312–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. (1980). Genetic size scaling rules in animal growth. Animal Production 30, 161–165.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. & Murray, J. I. (1987). Genetic aspects of mammalian survival and growth in relation to body size. In The Nutrition of Herbivores (Eds Hacker, J. B. & Ternouth, J. H.), pp. 487–533. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Uden, P., Rounsaville, T. R., Wiggans, G. R. & Van Soest, P. J. (1982). The measurement of liquid and solid digesta retention in ruminants, equines and rabbits given timothy (Phleum pratense) hay. British Journal of Nutrition 48, 329–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uden, P. & Van Soest, P. J. (1982). Comparative digestion of timothy (Phleum pratense) fibre by ruminants, equines and rabbits. British Journal of Nutrition 47, 267–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulyatt, M. J., Dellow, D. W., John, A., Reid, C. S. W. & Waghorn, G. C. (1986). Contribution of chewing during eating and rumination to the clearance of digesta from the reticulorumen. In Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants (Eds Milligan, L. P., Grovum, W. L. & Warner, A. C. I.), pp. 498–515. Proceedings of the VIth International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology, 1984. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J., Dellow, D. W., Reid, C. S. W. & Bauchop, T. (1975). Structure and function of the large intestine of ruminants. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (Eds McDonald, I. W. & Warner, A. C. I.), pp. 119–133. Proceedings of the IVth International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology, 1974. Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J., Waghorn, G. C., John, A., Reid, C. S. W. & Monro, J. (1984). Effect of intake and feeding frequency on feeding behaviour and quantitative aspects of digestion in sheep fed chaffed lucerne hay. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 645–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1982). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. Corvallis, Oregon: O & B Books Inc.Google Scholar
Varvikko, T. & Lindberg, J. E. (1985). Estimation of microbial nitrogen in nylon-bag residues by feed 15N dilution. British Journal of Nutrition 54, 473–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, A. C I. (1981). Rate of passage of digesta through the gut of mammals and birds. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B 51, 789–820.Google Scholar
Weston, R. H. & Hogan, J. P. (1968). The digestion of pasture plants by sheep. II. The digestion of ryegrass at different stages of maturity. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 963–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar