Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:52:24.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prediction of empty body weight and composition from live weight and other live animal measurements in lactating dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

T. YAN ,
D. C. PATTERSON ,
C. S. MAYNE ,
R. E. AGNEW  and
M. G. PORTER
T. YAN*
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, UK
D. C. PATTERSON
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, UK
C. S. MAYNE
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, UK
R. E. AGNEW
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, UK
M. G. PORTER
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, UK
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Empty body (EB) composition data from 146 lactating Holstein–Friesian dairy cows were analysed, with cows selected from a large herd to represent a wide range of animal factors including parity, live weight (LW), body condition score (BCS), milk yield and stage of lactation. The objectives of the study were to examine possible relationships between EB composition and live animal characteristics and to develop prediction equations for EB weight (EBW) and EB composition. EBW was strongly related to LW with a R2 of 0·90, and addition of BCS and stage of lactation increased the R2 to 0·93 and reduced the s.e. value from 19·8 to 16·8. There was a strong relationship between LW and EB mass of crude protein (CP) or water (R2=0·89 or 0·85), and addition of BCS, milk yield and stage of lactation as supporting predictors gave little improvement in the relationship between LW and EB mass of CP or water. Similar results were also obtained for the prediction of EB ash mass, but the relationship between EB ash mass and LW or a combination of LW and parity was relatively poor (R2=0·59 or 0·63). However, including BCS and milk yield as supporting predictors in the linear relationship between LW and EB masses of lipid (0·51 v. 0·79) and dry matter (DM) (0·79 v. 0·91) and total gross energy (GE) content (0·66 v. 0·85) considerably increased the R2 values. Similar linear and multiple relationships were also developed to predict EB component proportions of lipid, CP, GE, DM and water, and the R2 values were much smaller than those for EB component masses. The equations for prediction of EB component masses were evaluated through internal validation, by developing a range of similar new equations from two-thirds of the present data and then validating these new equations with the remaining one-third of data. The validation indicated that addition of other live animal factors to support LW to predict EBW and EB masses of lipid, GE and DM considerably increased the prediction accuracy, but had little effect on the prediction accuracy for EB masses of CP, water and ash. It is concluded that in lactating dairy cows, LW is a very good predictor of EB masses of CP and water. Accurate prediction of EBW and EB masses of lipid, GE and DM can be obtained using LW together with BCS, milk yield and stage of lactation.

Type
Modelling Animal Systems Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 147 , Issue 3 , June 2009 , pp. 241 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agnew, R. E. & Yan, T. (2000). The impact of recent research on energy feeding systems for dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 66, 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, R. E., Yan, T., France, J., Kebreab, E. & Thomas, C. (2004). Energy requirement and supply. In Feed into Milk: A New Applied Feeding System for Dairy Cows (Ed. Thomas, C.), pp. 11–20. Nottingham, UK: Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
Agnew, R. E., Yan, T., McCaughey, W. J., McEvoy, J. D., Patterson, D. C., Porter, M. G. & Steen, R. W. J. (2005). Relationships between urea dilution measurements and body weight and composition of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 2476–2486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agricultural and Food Research Council (1993). Energy and Protein Requirements of Ruminants. Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Andrew, S. M., Erdman, R. A. & Waldo, D. R. (1995). Prediction of body composition of dairy cows at three physiological stages from deuterium oxide and urea dilution. Journal of Dairy Science 78, 1083–1095.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrew, S. M., Waldo, D. R. & Erdman, R. A. (1994). Direct analysis of body composition of dairy cows at three physiological stages. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 3022–3033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (1996). Official Methods of Analysis. Washington, DC: AOAC.Google Scholar
Birnie, J. W. (1999). Factors influencing the fasting heat production of non-lactating dairy cattle. Ph.D. Thesis, The Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.Google Scholar
Bligh, E. G. & Dyer, W. J. (1959). A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry Physiology 37, 911–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brouwer, E. (1965). Report of sub-committee on constants and factors. In Energy Metabolism: Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium of European Association of Animal Production (Ed. Blaxter, K. L.), pp. 441–443. Publication No. 11. London, England: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gibb, M. J. & Ivings, W. E. (1993). A note on the estimation of the body fat, protein and energy content of lactating Holstein–Friesian cows by measurement of condition score and live weight. Animal Production 56, 281–283.Google Scholar
Gibb, M. J., Ivings, W. E., Dhanoa, M. S. & Sutton, J. D. (1992). Changes in body components of autumn-calving Holstein–Friesian cows over the first 29 weeks of lactation. Animal Production 55, 339–360.Google Scholar
Ivings, W. E., Gibb, M. J., Dhanoa, M. S. & Fisher, A. V. (1993). Relationships between velocity of ultrasound in live lactating dairy cows and some post-slaughter measurements of body composition. Animal Production 56, 9–16.Google Scholar
Mulvanny, P. M. (1977). Dairy Cow Condition Scoring. National Institute of Research for Dairying, paper 4468. Reading, England: NIRD.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) (2001). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th revised edn, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Porter, M. G. (1992). Comparison of sample preparation methods for the determination of the gross energy concentration of fresh silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology 37, 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. T. & Robb, J. (1971). Relationship of body composition to energy intake and energetic efficiency. Journal of Dairy Science 54, 553–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waltner, S. S., McNamara, J. P. & Hillers, J. K. (1994). Validation of indirect measures of body fat in lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 2570–2579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, I. A. & Russel, A. J. F. (1984 a). Partition of fat, body composition and body condition score in mature cows. Animal Production 38, 23–32.Google Scholar
Wright, I. A. & Russel, A. J. F. (1984 b). Estimation in vivo of the chemical composition of the bodies of mature cows. Animal Production 38, 33–44.Google Scholar