Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:33:12.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A possible effect of cyanogenic glucoside in sorghum on animal requirements for sulphur

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. L. Wheeler
Affiliation:
GSIRO Division of Animal Physiology, Pastoral Research Laboratory, Armidale, N.S.W., 2350
D. A. Hedges
Affiliation:
GSIRO Division of Animal Physiology, Pastoral Research Laboratory, Armidale, N.S.W., 2350
A. R. Till
Affiliation:
GSIRO Division of Animal Physiology, Pastoral Research Laboratory, Armidale, N.S.W., 2350

Summary

A significant proportion of the sulphur (S) ingested by animals grazing Sorghum spp. may be utilized to detoxify hydrogen cyanide liberated after the forage has been ingested. In 1973 young sheep grazing a sorghum x sudangrass hybrid were given access to salt licks containing < 0.1 % (control) or 18 % S; in two experiments the live-weight responses to S were 32% (P < 0.05) and 18% (P > 0.05). In 1974 sheep grazing forage fertilized with 84 kg N/ha and given access to licks containing 8.5% S gained 32 % more live weight than controls with 0.1 % licks. Those with S on forage fertilized with 168 kg N/ha gained 88 % more (P < 0.01). Gypsum applied as a fertilizer (0 or 21 kg S/ha) did not affect the response.

Type
Short Note
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, C. M. (1956). The metabolism of sulphur in the rumen of the sheep. New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology 37 A, 379–94.Google Scholar
Blakley, R. L. & Coop, I. E. (1949). The metabolism and toxicity of cyanides and cyanogenetic glucosides in sheep. II. Detoxication of hydrocyanic acid. New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology 31 (3) A, 116.Google Scholar
Boyazoglu, P. A., Barrett, E. L. & Du Toit, J. De V. (1972). Sulphur containing licks and their effect on the mineral-vitamin balance of sheep. South African Journal of Animal Science 2, 65—7.Google Scholar
Coop, I. E. (1951). The occurrence, metabolism and toxicity of cyanogenetic glucosides with special reference to white clover. Proceedings Special Conference Agriculture, Australia, 1949, Plant and Animal Nutrition in Relation to Soil and Climatic Factors, pp. 335–42. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Downes, A. M., Langlands, J. P. & Reis, P. J. (1974). The effect of sulphur supplementation on sheep and cattle production. In Sulphur in Australasian Agriculture. Sydney: Sydney University Press (In the Press.Google Scholar
Harms, C. L. & Tucker, B. B. (1973). Influence of nitrogen fertilization and other factors on yield, prussic acid, nitrate and total nitrogen concentrations of sudangrass cultivars. Agronomy Journal 65, 21–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoveland, C. S., Harris, R. R., Boseck, J. K. & Webster, W. P. (1971). Supplementation of steers grazing sorghum-sudan pasture. Auburn University Experiment Station Circular 188, 17.Google Scholar
Moir, R. J., Somers, M. & Bray, A. C. (19671968). Utilization of dietary sulphur and nitrogen by ruminants. Sulphur Institute Journal 3, 1518.Google Scholar
Rabas, D. L., Schmid, A. R. & Marten, G. C. (1970). Relationships of chemical composition and morphological characteristics to palatability in sudangrass and sorghum x sudangrass hybrids. Agronomy Journal 62, 762–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, J. L. & Hedges, D. A. (1972). Assessment of summer forage crops for sheep by the put-and-take grazing technique. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 825–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar