Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:10:27.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plant population and shading studies in barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. W. Willey  and
R. Holliday
R. W. Willey
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Berkshire, England
R. Holliday
Affiliation:
University of Leeds, Yorkshire, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two barley experiments are described in which a range of plant populations were shaded during different periods of development. Shading during the ear development period caused considerable reductions in grain yield, largely by reducing the number of grains per ear. Shading during the grain-filling period caused no reduction in grain yield. It is suggested that under conditions of these experiments there was probably a potential surplus of carbohydrate available for grain filling and that grain yield was largely determined by the storage capacity of the ears. The importance of the number of grains per ear as an indicator of individual ear capacity is emphasized.

The effects of plant population on grain yield and its components are also examined. It is concluded that the number of grains per ear is the component having greatest influence on the decrease in grain yield at above-optimum populations and attention is again drawn to the possible importance of ear capacity. It is argued that on an area basis the number of grains per unit area may give a good indication of ear capacity. Examination of this parameter shows a close relationship with grain yield per unit area for both the shading and population treatments. It is particularly evident that a decrease in grain yield at high populations was associated with a comparable decrease in the number of grains per unit area. It is suggested that this decrease in grain number may be due to a lower production of total dry matter during ear development rather than an unfavourable partitioning of this dry matter between the ear and the rest of the plant. This lower production of total dry matter is attributed to the crop growth rates of the higher populations having reached their peak and then having declined before the end of the ear development period. This crop growth rate pattern, through its effect on grain number per unit area, is put forward as the basic reason why, in the final crop, grain yield per unit area decreases at above-optimum populations.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 77 , Issue 3 , December 1971 , pp. 445 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, S. (1952). Methods for determining stages of development in barley and oats. Physiologia Pl. 5, 199–210.Google Scholar
Bingham, J. (1969). The physiological determinants of grain yield in cereals. Agric. Prog. 44, 30–42.Google Scholar
Bonnett, O. T. (1935). The development of the barley spike. J. agric. Res. 51, 451–7.Google Scholar
Cannell, R. Q. (1969). The tillering pattern in barley varieties. I. Production, survival and contribution to yield by component tillers. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72, 405–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, C. M. (1963). Competition among crop and pasture plants. Adv. Agron. 15, 1—118.Google Scholar
Holliday, R. & Willey, R. W. (1989). Variety potential in cereals and its improvement. Agric. Prog. 44, 56–77.Google Scholar
Kamel, M. S. (1959). A physiological study of shading and density effects on the growth and efficiency of solar energy conversion in some field crops. Meded. Landb Hoogesch. Wageningen 59, no. 3.Google Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. (1967). The effect of plant density upon the growth and yield of barley. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68, 317–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. (1969). The effect of sowing date and plant density on barley. Ann. appl. Biol. 63, 513–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. & Faris, D. G. (1970). Plant population induced growth correlations in the barley plant main shoot and possible hormonal mechanisms. J. exp. Bot. 21, 787–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, R. W. & Dent, J. D. (1969). The supply and storage of carbohydrate in wheat and barley. Agric. Prog. 44, 43–55.Google Scholar