Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:56:44.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plant growth with nutrient solutions: III. A comparison of sand and soil as the aggregate for plant growth, using an optimum nutrient solution with the sand, and incomplete supplies of nutrients with ‘once-used‘ soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Rowland Marcus Woodman
Affiliation:
Horticultural Research Station, School of Agriculture, Cambridge
Delphine Ainslie Johnson
Affiliation:
Horticultural Research Station, School of Agriculture, Cambridge

Extract

Experiments are described in which the ‘once-used’ soils left over from previous culture experiments were employed as aggregates in the growth of vegetables. It was demonstrated that sand with full nutrients was superior to ‘once-used’ soil with water only, but that ‘once-used’ soil supplied with the full quota of soluble nitrogen was superior to the sand with full nutrients. The root of the cabbage in sand was an exception, and a possible explanation was that sand as aggregate favoured true root formation, while soil favoured the formation of tops. The ‘once-used’ soil in these experiments deteriorated in physical propertes owing to the conditions of the experiment, which included the use of nitrogen as sodium nitrate, possibly owing to the tendency to the formation of sodium clay; it is argued that a judicious choice of fertilizers and/or the use of flocculating electrolytes should overcome such tendencies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Taylor, E. Mck. & Woodman, R. M. (1931). J. Soc. Chem. Ind., Lond., 50, 203T.Google Scholar
Woodman, R. M. & Johnson, D. A. (1946). J. Agr. Sci. 36, 8086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar