Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:11:53.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Placement of fertilizers for row crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. W. Cooke
G. W. Cooke
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Fertilizer placed in contact with the seed damaged the germination of sugar beet, mangolds, swedes and peas in 1947; damage was also caused by fertilizer placed directly below the seed. In 1947 and 1948 some damage to the germination of sugar beet was caused by fertilizer in bands 3 in. below the soil surface and 1 in. to the side of the seed; in both years bands of fertilizer 3 in. to the side of the seed were safe. Where placement of medium or full fertilizer dressings is adopted for row crops, the bands should be placed not less than 2 in. from the seed to avoid the risk of injury to germination.

All methods of placing gave consistently higher yields of peas than broadcasting fertilizer, the average advantage of placing being over 2 cwt. of peas per acre. In all the experiments on peas in 1948 early applications broadcast and worked deeply into the seed-bed were somewhat superior to late applications made at sowing time.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , October 1949 , pp. 359 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boyd, D. A. & Mathison, I. (1947). J. Minist. Agric. 54, 325–8.Google Scholar
Cobb, G. R. (1946). Amer. Fertil. 104, no. 1, pp. 9, 10, 28, 30.Google Scholar
Cooke, G. W. (1947). Agric. Engng Rec. 1, 240–4.Google Scholar
Cumings, R. W. (1943). Annual Report and Proceedings of the National Joint Committee on Fertilizer Application, pp. 27–32.Google Scholar
Halliday, D. J. (1948). Jealott's Hill Res. Sta. Bull., no. 7. Imperial Chemical Industries.Google Scholar
Hanley, F. (1947). J. Minist. Agric. 54, 354–7.Google Scholar
Lawes, J. B. (1847). J.R. Agric. Soc. E. 8, 494–565.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. H. (1941). J. Agric. Sci. 31, 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, J. A. & Hanley, F. (1936). J. Minist. Agric. 42, 1205–11.Google Scholar
Miles, R. O. (1947). Jealott's Hill Res. Sta. Bull., no. 4. Imperial Chemical Industries.Google Scholar
National Institute of Agricultural Engineering (1948). Agric. Engng Rec. 2, 86–8.Google Scholar
Salter, R. M. (1938). Yearbook of U.S. Dep. Agric., pp. 546–62.Google Scholar
Weaver, J. E. (1926). Root Development of Field Crops. McGraw Hill Publishing Co. 1st ed.Google Scholar
Wolf, B. (1947). Amer. Fertil. 107, no. 2, pp. 7, 8, 28, 30.Google Scholar