Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:11:54.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phosphorus leaching from liquid digested sewage sludge applied to sandy soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2001

M. A. SHEPHERD
Affiliation:
ADAS, Gleadthorpe Research Centre, Meden Vale, Mansfield, Notts NG20 9PF, UK
P. J. WITHERS
Affiliation:
ADAS, Bridgets Research Centre, Martyr Worthy, Winchester, Hants SO21 1AP, UK

Abstract

The aim of the experiment was to determine the importance of liquid digested sewage sludge (‘sewage sludge’) as a source of phosphorus leaching from sandy soils in the UK. The sewage sludge was applied to uncropped loamy sand and sandy loam monolith lysimeters (1·2 m deep) annually for 3 years. The application rate was sufficient to supply approximately 60 kg P/ha annually. An application equivalent to four times this amount was also applied to two other loamy sand lysimeters to test the effects of excessive amounts. Total P (TP), total dissolved P (TDP) and molybdate-reactive P (MRP) concentrations were measured in the drainage water and were compared with leaching from untreated control soils.

After two sewage sludge applications, Olsen's extractable P content of the topsoil had increased: a P surplus of c. 100 kg/ha was required to raise the topsoil concentration by 5 mg/kg. Sewage sludge applications at the lower rate did not increase P concentrations in the drainage. Phosphorus concentrations were generally small and were, as an average of both soil types and nil and lower rate sludge applications, 12, 20 and 34 μg/l for MRP, TDP and TP respectively. Phosphorus leaching losses from the higher rate (excessively large sewage sludge applications) were more variable but not significantly (P > 0·05) different from the other treatments. Average concentrations were 9, 23 and 50 μg/l for MRP, TDP and TP respectively. Leaching from sludge biosolid applications at operational rates to sandy soils moderately well supplied with P is not a major P loss pathway.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)