Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T16:19:47.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phenotypic plasticity of yield and related traits in rainfed durum wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2013

R. MOHAMMADI
R. MOHAMMADI*
Affiliation:
Dryland Agricultural Research Institute (DARI), P O Box 67145-1164, Kermanshah, Iran
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Rainfall and temperature are unpredictable in Mediterranean environments, which results in inconsistent environmental conditions for crop growth and a critical source of uncertainty for farmers and growers. The objectives of the present study were to: (i) quantify and compare the plasticity of durum breeding lines, a modern cultivar and landraces on the basis of yield and agronomic traits and (ii) study associations between plasticity of yield and plasticity of agronomic and phenological traits. Plasticity was quantified using linear models for 11 durum breeding lines, one modern cultivar and two landraces grown in 21 diversified environments. The results showed that the effects due to environment, genotype and genotype×environment (G×E) interaction were significant, which indicates the existence of differences among genotypes for plasticity. Yield ranged from 1939 to 2419 kg/ha across environments and the range of plasticity was 0·66–1·13. The breeding lines and the modern cultivar had higher grain yields compared with the landraces at the same level of plasticity. The landraces with below-average plasticity in yield were characterized as tall in stature and late in heading and maturity, whereas the breeding lines and modern cultivar with above-average plasticity in yield were early in heading and maturity, semi-dwarf and high-yielding, which indicates the success in breeding the materials for unpredictable environmental conditions. In conclusion, yield plasticity was associated with yield improvement and high yield plasticity tends to associate with earliness, shorter plants and low grain weight.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 152 , Issue 6 , December 2014 , pp. 873 - 884
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Austin, R. B., Ford, M. A. & Morgan, C. L. (1989). Genetic improvement in the yield of winter wheat: a further evaluation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 112, 295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, A. (2005). Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential – are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 1159–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, A. D. (1965). Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advances in Genetics 13, 115–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, A. D. (2006). Unravelling phenotypic plasticity – why should we bother? New Phytologist 170, 644–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calderini, D. F. & Slafer, G. A. (1999). Has yield stability changed with genetic improvement of wheat yield? Euphytica 107, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattivelli, L., Rizza, F., Badeck, F. W., Mazzucotelli, E., Mastrangelo, A. M., Francia, E., Marè, C., Tondelli, A. & Stanca, A. M. (2008). Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: an integrated view from breeding to genomic. Field Crops Research 105, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceccarelli, S. (1996). Positive interpretation of genotype by environment interactions in relation to sustainability and biodiversity. In Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement (Eds Cooper, M. & Hammer, G. L.), pp. 467–486. Wallingford, UK: CABI.Google Scholar
Chapman, S. C. (2008). Use of crop models to understand genotype by environment interactions for drought in real-world and simulated plant breeding trials. Euphytica 161, 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, M. & Byth, D. E. (1996). Understanding plant adaptation to achieve systematic applied crop improvement – a fundamental challenge. In Plant Adaptation and Crop Improvement (Eds Cooper, M. & Hammer, G. L.), pp. 5–23. Wallingford, UK: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vita, P., Mastrangelo, A. M., Matteu, L., Mazzucotelli, E., Virzi, N., Palumbo, M., Lo Storto, M., Rizza, F. & Cattivelli, L. (2010). Genetic improvement effects on yield stability in durum wheat genotypes grown in Italy. Field Crops Research 119, 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWitt, T. J. & Langerhans, R. B. (2004). Integrated solutions to environmental heterogeneity. In Phenotypic Plasticity. Functional and Conceptual Approaches (Eds DeWitt, T. J. & Scheiner, S. M.), pp. 98–111. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, N. J., Kazem, A. J. N., Reale, D. & Wright, J. (2010). Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finlay, K. W. & Wilkinson, G. N. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 742–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (2007). Understanding the physiological basis of yield potential in wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 145, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, S. & Herron, J. C. (2007). Evolutionary Analysis. Upper Saddle River, USA: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Futuyma, D. J. (1998). Evolutionary Biology. Sunderland, USA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Lacaze, X., Hayes, P. M. & Korol, A. (2009). Genetics of phenotypic plasticity: QTL analysis in barley, Hordeum vulgare . Heredity 102, 163–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loomis, R. S. & Connor, D. J. (1996). Crop Ecology. Productivity and Management in Agricultural Systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muñoz, P., Voltas, J., Araus, J. L., Igartua, E. & Romagosa, I. (1998). Changes in adaptation of barley releases over time in north eastern Spain. Plant Breeding 117, 531–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigliucci, M. (2001). Phenotypic plasticity. In Evolutionary Ecology. Concepts and Case Studies (Eds Fox, C. W., Roff, D. A. & Fairbairn, D. J.), pp. 58–69. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pigliucci, M., Whitton, J. & Schlichting, C. D. (1995). Reaction norms of Arabidopsis.1. Plasticity of characters and correlations across water, nutrient and light gradients. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 8, 421–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reymond, M., Muller, B., Leonardi, A., Charcosset, A. & Tardieu, F. (2003). Combining quantitative trait loci analysis and an ecophysiological model to analyze the genetic variability of the responses of maize leaf growth to temperature and water deficit. Plant Physiology 131, 664–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, M., Foulkes, M. J., Slafer, G. A., Berry, P., Parry, M. A. J., Snape, J. W. & Angus, W. J. (2009). Raising yield potential in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 60, 1899–1918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadras, V. O. & Trentacoste, E. R. (2011). Phenotypic plasticity of stem water potential correlates with crop load in horticultural trees. Tree Physiology 31, 494–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadras, V. O., Reynolds, M. P., de la Vega, A. J., Petrie, P. R. & Robinson, R. (2009). Phenotypic plasticity of yield and phenology in wheat, sunflower and grapevine. Field Crops Research 110, 242–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlichting, C. D. & Pigliucci, M. (1998). Phenotypic Evolution: a Reaction Norm Perspective. Sunderland, USA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Schlichting, C. D. & Smith, H. (2002). Phenotypic plasticity: linking molecular mechanisms with evolutionary outcomes. Evolutionary Ecology 16, 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheiner, S. M. (1993). Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24, 35–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slafer, G. A. & Araus, J. L. (2007). Physiological traits for improving wheat yield under a wide range of conditions. In Scale and Complexity in Plant Systems Research: Gene-Plant-Crop Relations (Eds Spiertz, J. H. J., Struik, P. C. & van Laar, H. H.), pp. 147–156. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slafer, G. A., Satorre, E. H. & Andrade, F. H. (1994). Increases in grain yield in bread wheat from breeding and associated physiological changes. In Genetic Improvement of Field Crops (Ed. Slafer, G. A.), pp. 1–68. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Tollenaar, M. & Lee, E. A. (2002). Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize. Field Crops Research 75, 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voltas, J., Romagosa, I., Lafarga, A., Armesto, A. P., Sombrero, A. & Araus, J. L. (1999). Genotype by environment interaction for grain yield and carbon isotope discrimination of barley in Mediterranean Spain. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 1263–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, J. (2004). Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 6, 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar