Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:52:05.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The performance of the hooded gene of barley (Hordeum vulgare) in rainfed Mediterranean climates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. Hadjichristodoulou
A. Hadjichristodoulou
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The progenies of six crosses, made in 1987, between the best available hooded barley line and six selected awned barley lines were used to study the effect of the hooded gene on the performance of barley under rainfed conditions in Cyprus. A single dominant gene was found to control the hooded character. Awned genotypes on average outyielded hooded genotypes by 17%, but the difference between the two genotypes was smaller in the central plain than in the coastal area. The effect of the hooded gene on yield varied also with the combination of parents, as the superiority of the awned genotypes varied with cross from 13 to 30%. Hooded lines giving a higher grain yield than their hooded parent were identified. On average the awned genotypes had higher 1000-grain weight (5·0 g), were slightly later in heading date (1·1 days), had slightly higher volume weight (1·3 kg/hl) than hooded genotypes, but had similar plant height. The 1000-grain weight of most hooded lines was significantly higher than that of their hooded parent.

In spite of the negative effects of the hooded gene on grain yield, it was concluded that it is possible to increase the yield of hooded barley for hay production by continued crossing and selection (with special emphasis on 1000-grain weight), by selecting special combinations of parents through the Bulk-Pedigree method and by growing hooded barley in suitable areas, making use of the locationdependent performance of the hooded gene.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 123 , Issue 3 , December 1994 , pp. 313 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blum, A. (1985). Photosynthesis and transpiration in leaves and ears of wheat and barley varieties. Journal of Experimental Botany 36, 432–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). Lattice designs. In Experimental Designs, pp. 396–438. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Day, A. D., Thompson, R. K., Jackson, E. B. & Carasso, F. M. (1974). Registration of Arizona 5919–8 hooded barley germplasm. Crop Science 14, 610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federer, W. T. & Raghavarao, D. (1975). On augmented designs. Biometrics 31, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundbacher, F. J. (1963). The physiological function of the cereal awn. Botanical Review 29, 366–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1979). Sanokrithi–79. A hooded barley for hay. Technical Bulletin No. 28. Nicosia, Cyprus: Agricultural Research Institute.Google Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1985). Pure line selection within Sanokrithi–79 hooded barley. Miscellaneous Reports 17. Nicosia, Cyprus: Agricultural Research Institute.Google Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1988). The use of Hordeum spontaneum to breed barley for grain and self-regenerating pasture. In Cereal Breeding Related to Integrated Cereal Production (Eds Jorna, M. L. & Slootmaker, L. A. J.), pp. 195–199. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1994). Breeding barley for forage and grain production in drylands. Technical Bulletin No. 158. Nicosia, Cyprus: Agricultural Research Institute.Google Scholar
Hadjipanayiotou, M. & Economides, S. (1983). The feeding value of barley hays made from three varieties cut at different growth stages. Technical Bulletin No. 47. Nicosia, Cyprus: Agricultural Research Institute.Google Scholar
Harlan, J. R. (1979). On the origin of barley. In Barley. Agriculture Handbook No 338, pp. 10–36. Washington: USDA.Google Scholar
Hockett, E. A., Welty, L. E., Carlson, G. R., Wichman, D. W., Ditterlie, R. L. & Larson, R. A. (1990). Registration of ‘Haybet’ barley. Crop Science 30, 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, K. (1951). Two class segregations. In The Measurement of Linkage in Heredity, pp. 13–25. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Nilan, R. A. (1964). Spike and grain characters. In The Cytology and Genetics of Barley 1951–1962, pp. 118–134. USA: Washington State University Press.Google Scholar
Petersen, R. G. (1985). Augmented designs for preliminary yield trials (Revised). Rachis 4 (1), 27–32.Google Scholar
Reid, D. A. & Wiebe, G. A. (1979). Taxonomy, botany, classification and world collection. In Barley. Agricultural Handbook No 338, pp. 78–104. Washington: USDA.Google Scholar
Stebbins, G. L. & Yagil, E. (1966). The morphogenetic effects of the hooded gene in barley. I. The course of development in hooded and awned genotypes. Genetics 54, 727–741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suneson, C. A. & Ramage, R. T. (1962). Competition between near-isogenic genotypes. Crop Science 2, 249–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suneson, C. A. & Stevens, H. (1957). An evaluation of smooth-awned and hooded Atlas barley. Agronomy Journal 49, 50–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, R. (1987). Genetic features of East Asian barleys. In Barley Genetics V, Proceedings of the Fifth Barlev Genetics Symposium, pp. 7–20. Okayama: Marusen Co. Ltd.Google Scholar