Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:46:28.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The performance of Santa Gertrudis, Sahiwal, Brahman and cross-bred animals in the intermediate savannahs of Guyana: 2. Birth weight and preweaning performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. Harricharan ,
P. Mahadevan  and
B. G. F. Springer
H. Harricharan
Affiliation:
The University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad
P. Mahadevan
Affiliation:
The University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad
B. G. F. Springer
Affiliation:
The University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Data collected over a period of 11 years at the Ebini Livestock Station in the intermediate savannahs of Guyana were analysed to determine the effect of breed or cross, sire, sex, year and season of birth of calf, and age and length of calving interval of the dam on weights at birth and at 4, 8 and 12 months of age, in Santa Gertrudis, Sahiwal and Brahman cattle. The heritability of body weights at the different ages was estimated.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 87 , Issue 2 , October 1976 , pp. 269 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, A. L. & Black, W. G. (1950). Crossbred types of beef cattle for the Gulf Coast Region. U.S.D.A. Circular No. 844.Google Scholar
Burris, M. J. & Blunn, C. T. (1952). Some factors affecting gestation length and bulk weight of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 11, 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, W. M., Phillips, R. W. & Black, W. H. (1947). Birth weight as a criterion of selection in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 6, 247–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, G. F. Jr, Cartwright, T. C. & Kruse, W. E. (1965). Heterosis for birth weight in Brahman Hereford crosses. Journal of Animal Science, 24, 93–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, K. E., Blunn, C. T. & Baker, M. L. (1950). A study of some of the factors influencing the birth and weaning weights of beef calves. Journal of Animal Science 9, 338–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, W. R. (1960). Least squares analysis of data with unequal sub-class numbers. U.S.D.A., ARS 20–8.Google Scholar
Harricharan, H. (1971). Genetic and phenotypic parameters of Santa Gertrudis, Sahiwal, Brahman and crossbred animals reared in the Intermediate Savannahs of Guyana. Ph.D. Thesis. University of the West Indies.Google Scholar
Hazel, L. N. & Terril, C. E. (1945). Heritability of weaning weight and staple length on range Rambouillet lambs. Journal of Animal Science 4, 347–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, C. R. (1953). Estimation of variance and covariance components. Biometrics 9, 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, B. Jr, Baker, A. L., Quesenberry, J. R. & Clark, R. T. (1942). Growth and production factors in range cattle. Montana Experimental Bulletin 400.Google Scholar
Knapp, B. Jr & Norsdkog, A. W. (1946). Heritability of growth and efficiency of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 5, 62–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knapp, B. Jr & Clark, R. T. (1950). Revised estimates of heritability of economic characteristics in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 9, 582–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koch, R. M. & Clark, R. T. (1955 a). Influence of sex, season of birth and age of dam on economic traits in range beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 14, 386–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, R. M. & Clark, R. T. (1955 b). Genetic and environmental relationships among economic characteristics in beef cattle. I. Correlation among paternal and maternal half sibs. Journal of Animal Science 14, 775–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudgal, V. D. & Ray, S. N. (1965). Growth studies on Indian breeds of cattle. II. Studies on the growth of Sahiwal cattle. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 18, 65–71.Google Scholar
Rhoad, A. D., Phillips, R. W. & Dawson, W. M. (1945). Evaluation of species crosses of cattle by polyallel crossing. A study of Zebu and Africander × Aberdeen Angus cattle under subtropical conditions. Journal of Heredity 36, 367–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelby, C. E., Clark, R. T. & Woodward, R. R. (1955). The heritability of some economic characteristics of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 14, 372–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelby, C. E., Clark, R. J., Quesenberry, J. R. & Woodward, R. R. (1960). Heritability of some economic characteristics in records of performance of bulls. Journal of Animal Science 19, 450–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stonaker, H. H. (1953). Estimates of genetic changes in an Indian herd of Red Sindhi dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 36, 688–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, J. R. (1961). Factors affecting the variation in weight of Zebu suckling calves. I. Breed and year. Experientiae. Vicosa. M. Gerias 1, 281. Animal Breed Abstracts 32, 937.Google Scholar
Torres, J. R. (1962). Genetio correlations between weights and rates of gain in Zebu calves. Experientiae. Vicosa. M. Gerias 2, 445. Animal Breed Abstracts 31, 1969.Google Scholar
Touchberry, R. W. (1967). A study of N'Dama cattle at the Musaia Animal Husbandry Station in Sierre Leone. Bulletin. Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station pp. 724–63.Google Scholar
Vorster, T. H. (1964). Factors influencing the growth production and reproduction of different breeds of cattle under range conditions in Southern Rhodesia. Southern Rhodesia Agricultural Research Bulletin no. 1, 1–133.Google Scholar
Willis, M. B. & Preston, T. R. (1968). The reproductive performance of four breeds of beef cows in Cuba. Revista Gubana de Gienda Agricola 3, p. 78.Google Scholar
Woodward, R. R. & Clark, R. T. (1950). The repeatability of performance of several Hereford sires as measured by progeny records. Journal of Animal Science, 9, 588–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed