Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:03:52.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oviposition deterrence and ovicidal properties of some plant powders against Callosobruchus maculatus in stored cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) seeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. I. Ofuya
T. I. Ofuya
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Production, Federal University of Technology, PMB 704, Akure, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Powders made from 15 plant species were tested in the laboratory against C. maculatus on stored cowpea seeds. Fewest eggs were laid on seeds mixed with Nicotiana tabacum powder. Few eggs were also laid on seeds mixed with powders obtained from Erythrophleum suaveolens and Ocimum gratissimum. N. tabacum powder, followed by E. suaveolens powder, was the most effective in reducing egg hatch.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 115 , Issue 3 , December 1990 , pp. 343 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Caswell, G. H. (1976). The storage of grain legumes. In Entomology and the Nigerian Economy (Ed. Youdeowei, A.), pp. 131–142. Ibadan: Entomological Society of Nigeria.Google Scholar
Das, G. P. (1987). Efficacy of neem oil on the egg and grub mortality of Callosobruchus chinensis Linn. (Bruchidae: Coleoptera). Tropical Grain Legume Bulletin 34, 14–15.Google Scholar
Delobel, A. & Malonga, P. (1987). Insecticidal properties of six plant materials against Caryedon serratus (O1.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Stored Products Research 23, 173–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giga, D. P. & Smith, R. H. (1987). Egg production and development of Callosobruchus rhodesianus (Pic) and C. maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on several commodities at two different temperatures. Journal of Stored Products Research 23, 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golob, P.Webley, D. J. (1980). The use of plants and minerals as traditional protectants of stored products. Report of Tropical Products Institute G138.Google Scholar
Jackai, L. E. N. & Daoust, R. A. (1986). Insect pests of cowpeas. Annual Review of Entomology 31, 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nwanze, K. F. & Horber, E. (1975). Laboratory techniques for screening cowpea for resistance to Callosobruchus maculatus F. Environmental Entomology. 4, 415–419.Google Scholar
Ofuya, T. I. (1986). Use of wood ash, dry chilli pepper fruits and onion scale leaves for reducing Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) damage in cowpea seeds during storage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 467–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olaifa, J. I., Erhun, W. O. & Akingbohungbe, A. E. (1987). Insecticidal activity of some Nigerian plants. Insect Science and its Application 8, 221–224.Google Scholar
Singh, S. R. & Jackai, L. E. N. (1985). Insect pests of cowpeas in Africa: their life cycle, economic importance and potential for control. In Cowpea Research, Production and Utilization (Eds Singh, S. R. & Rachie, K. O), pp. 217–231. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Sofowora, A. (1982). Medicinal Plants and Traditional Medicine in Africa. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Wasserman, S. S. (1985). Oviposition behaviour and its disruption in the southern cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 78, 89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar