Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:25:40.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nutritional compositions of Katuk leaves and their supplementation to hays of different quality: an in vitro study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2023

R.R. Nurdianti*
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics (Hans-Ruthenberg-Institute), University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany Faculty of Animal Husbandry, University of Padjadjaran, 45363 Sumedang, Indonesia Faculty of Animal Science, Animal Feed and Nutrition Modelling (AFENUE) Research Group, IPB University, 16680 Bogor, Indonesia
R. S. Nuryana
Affiliation:
Faculty of Animal Husbandry, University of Padjadjaran, 45363 Sumedang, Indonesia
A. Handoko
Affiliation:
Faculty of Animal Husbandry, University of Padjadjaran, 45363 Sumedang, Indonesia
I. Hernaman
Affiliation:
Faculty of Animal Husbandry, University of Padjadjaran, 45363 Sumedang, Indonesia
D. Ramdani
Affiliation:
Faculty of Animal Husbandry, University of Padjadjaran, 45363 Sumedang, Indonesia Faculty of Animal Science, Animal Feed and Nutrition Modelling (AFENUE) Research Group, IPB University, 16680 Bogor, Indonesia
A. Jayanegara
Affiliation:
Faculty of Animal Science, Animal Feed and Nutrition Modelling (AFENUE) Research Group, IPB University, 16680 Bogor, Indonesia Department of Nutrition and Feed Technology, IPB University, 16680 Bogor, Indonesia
U. Dickhoefer
Affiliation:
Institute of Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics (Hans-Ruthenberg-Institute), University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Kiel University, 24098 Kiel, Germany
C. Böttger
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
K.-H. Südekum
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
*
Corresponding author: R.R. Nurdianti; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Katuk leaves (Sauropus androgynus (L.) Merr.; KL) are widely consumed by breast-feeding Indonesian mothers as it has been reported to increase breast milk production. It is hypothesized that supplementing KL in diets might increase crude protein (CP) concentration and fibre digestibility in the diet. The KL had high CP and non-fibre carbohydrate concentrations (333 and 332 g/kg dry matter; DM, respectively), but low neutral detergent fibre assayed with heat, a stable amylase and expressed exclusive of residual ash (aNDFom; 200 g/kg DM). Fibre digestibility linearly increased with increasing of KL supplementation in low-quality hay (LQH) diets. The KL did not contain a considerable amount of tannins. In LQH diets, gas production after 24 h incubation (GP24) linearly increased with increasing of KL supplementation (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, GP24 linearly decreased with increasing of KL supplementation in medium- and high-quality hays (MQH and HQH; P < 0.001). Metabolizable energy tended to linearly increase in LQH diets, but tended to linearly decrease with increasing of KL supplementation in MQH and HQH diets (P = 0.078). Therefore, this study suggested that KL can be a potential supplement in the ruminant diet due to its abundant dietary proteins but low fibre concentration in its leaves. However, further studies (e.g. in vitro or in vivo) investigating other rumen parameters after incubation should be performed to validate how KL can be supplemented in the diet of ruminant livestock.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Dairy cattle in developing countries often produce less milk and have shorter lactation periods than cattle in other regions. Poor animal performance in small-scale dairy systems in developing countries is the result of factors such as climate (high ambient temperature and humidity), low-quality feed, low levels of concentrate supplementation, low genetic potential for milk production of multi-purpose animals (in addition to milk and meat these cattle also often provide draught power) and high incidence of diseases (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2014). In tropical and sub-tropical developing countries, there is a gap between available and required animal feeds. Typically, ruminants in those countries are fed lignified forages and crop residues that are low in available energy and nitrogen (N; Nasser et al., Reference Nasser, El-Waziry and Sallam2009).

Sauropus androgynus (L.) Merr. (Katuk) is a perennial shrub found growing wild in South East Asia and widely cultivated in Indonesia and Malaysia (Padmavathi and Rao, Reference Padmavathi and Rao1990). Katuk, a plant species of the Euphorbiaceae family, is rich in fatty acids, flavonoids and polyphenols as the main bioactive constituents (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Cheng, Zhang, Bai, Liu, Li, Koike, Akihisa, Feng and Zhang2020) and is commonly utilized as a medicinal herb in the treatment of diabetes, cancer, inflammation, microbial infection, ulcers, obesity and allergies (Paul and Beena Anto, Reference Paul and Beena Anto2011; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Cheng, Zhang, Bai, Liu, Li, Koike, Akihisa, Feng and Zhang2020). However, it is not recommended to consume excessive amount of freshly uncooked Katuk leaves (KL) over a period of time, because it could be associated with the occurrence of bronchiolitis obliterans disease (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Cheng, Zhang, Bai, Liu, Li, Koike, Akihisa, Feng and Zhang2020). Consumption of extract of KL is considered to increase milk production in human mothers during lactation up to 50.7 g/100 g (Sa'roni et al., Reference Sa'roni, Sadjiman, Sja'bani and Zulaela2012). Supplementing KL in the diet might also increase the milk yield of ruminants. In addition, Noach et al. (Reference Noach, Handayani and Henuk2020) reported that KL inclusion (with or without Zn bio complex) in a concentrate diet of late pregnant Ettawah could improve the milk production and birth weight of kid during kidding period.

Evaluating the nutritive value of the available local feed resources is important to assess their potential role in the nutrition of livestock (Taghizadeh et al., Reference Taghizadeh, Palangi and Safamehr2008) which can influence the livestock productivity (Geremew et al., Reference Geremew, Negesse and Abebe2017). For this, in vitro techniques are commonly used to screen a variety of feedstuffs that are not available in sufficient quantity for in vivo experiments (Getachew et al., Reference Getachew, Crovetto, Fondevila, Krishnamoorthy, Singh, Spanghero, Steingass, Robinson and Kailas2002). Menke and Steingass (Reference Menke and Steingass1988) reported a strong correlation between metabolizable energy (ME) values measured in vivo and predicted from 24 h in vitro gas production (GP) and chemical composition of feeds. In vitro GP is an alternative technique used to determine the nutritive value of feedstuffs, since rate and extent of degradation and rumen fermentation can be simply determined by measurement of cumulative GP (Sommart et al., Reference Sommart, Parker, Rowlinson and Wanapat2000). In vitro GP technique is less expensive, easy to determine and appropriate for use in developing countries (Salamatazar et al., Reference Salamatazar, Salamatdoust-nobar and Sis2012). Fibre digestibility can also be determined using a modified in vitro technique (Tilley and Terry, Reference Tilley and Terry1963; Robertson and Van Soest, Reference Robertson, Van Soest, James and Theander1981). With respect to KL as animal feed supplement, limited information is available on their nutritive value and ruminal degradation. Therefore, the present study aimed at testing a hypothesis that the nutritive value of KL and their supplementation to hays of different quality could improve the crude protein (CP) concentration, fibre digestibility and ME, especially in low-quality hay diet. The preliminary findings of this study were published in abstract form (Nurdianti et al., Reference Nurdianti, Südekum and Böttger2017).

Materials and methods

Sample collection and experimental design

Approximately 0.5 kg of fresh leaves of KL without stem were harvested for the sample collection. Samples of KL with old maturity were collected from 80–90 cm herbaceous-shrub plant in Bandung, Indonesia. In Bandung, annual precipitation ranges from 2500 to 3000 mm and temperature ranges from 24 to 28 °C (BMKG, 2013).

After collection, KL samples were stored at 4 °C overnight, oven dried at 60 °C for 24 h (F115, Binder GmbH, Tuttlingen, Germany), and ground to pass a 1 mm sieve using a laboratory mill (model SM100, Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany). As a substrate for KL to be added to, three grass hays from temperate regions (grown in Germany and Switzerland) were selected based on their CP concentration to represent a wide range of qualities: hay with low quality (LQH), hay with medium quality (MQH) and hay with high quality (HQH). Hays were ground to pass a 1 mm sieve using the same mill as for KL. Samples of KL and each grass hay were incubated alone or in KL + grass hay combinations with four different inclusion levels of KL (i.e. 0, 50, 100 and 200 g/kg dry matter (DM)). The cows used as donor animals were housed in accordance with the German Animal Welfare legislation. All procedures for animal handling within the present study were performed according to the National Committee for the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes for the Federal Republic of Germany. The experimental diets were arranged in a completely randomized design in six replicates. The feedstuff combinations, i.e. diets, are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Ingredient composition and calculated chemical composition (n = 2) of the experimental diets

ADFom, acid detergent fibre expressed exclusive of residual ash; aNDFom, neutral detergent fibre assayed with a heat-stable amylase and expressed exclusive of residual ash; DM, dry matter; FM, fresh matter; Lignin (sa), lignin determined by solubilization of cellulose with sulphuric acid; NFC, non-fibrous carbohydrate.

a Cellulose = ADFom – Lignin (sa); hemicellulose = aNDFom – ADFom; NFC = 1000 – (aNDFom + crude protein + ether extract + ash).

Chemical analyses

Chemical composition of the individual sample was determined according to the Association of German Agricultural Analytic and Research Institutes (Verband Deutscher Landwirtschaftlicher Untersuchungs- und Forschungsanstalten, 2007). The DM concentration was determined by oven-drying at 105 °C for 24 h (method 3.1) and ash concentration was determined by incinerating samples at 550  °C for 5 h (method 8.1). The N concentration was determined by Kjeldahl procedure (method 4.1.2) and CP was calculated as N×6.25. Ether extract (EE) concentration was analysed using method 5.1.1. Neutral detergent fibre, assayed with a heat-stable amylase and expressed exclusive of residual ash (aNDFom), acid detergent fibre, expressed exclusive of residual ash (ADFom) and lignin determined by solubilization of cellulose with sulphuric acid (Lignin (sa)) concentrations were measured using an ANKOM200 Fibre Analyzer (Ankom Technology Corp., Macedon, NY, USA) according to methods 6.5.1, 6.5.2 and 6.5.3, respectively. Sodium sulphite was used for the aNDFom analysis. Concentration of hemicelluloses was determined by subtracting ADFom concentration from aNDFom concentration and concentration of cellulose by subtracting Lignin (sa) concentration from ADFom concentration (Rinne et al., Reference Rinne, Jaakkola and Huhtanen1997). All samples were analysed in duplicate for each chemical constituent and analysis repeated, if the coefficient of variation exceeded 5%.

Non-fibre carbohydrates (NFC) were calculated according to National Research Council (2001), as:

(1)$${\rm NFC} = 1000-( {{\rm aNDFom} + {\rm CP} + {\rm EE} + {\rm ash}} ) $$

where all nutrient concentrations are in g/kg DM.

Tannin bioassay

To investigate whether the KL sample contained tannins or not, an indirect approach was selected. Katuk leaves were evaluated using polyethylene glycol (PEG) supplementation in an in vitro GP experiment as mentioned by Jayanegara et al. (Reference Jayanegara, Togtokhbayar, Makkar and Becker2009). The PEG has a high affinity for tannins and makes tannins inactive by binding to them. Hence, KL samples (220–250 mg) were incubated without and with 750 mg PEG supplementation with 10 ml of rumen fluid and 20 ml of buffer solution (Menke et al., Reference Menke, Raab, Salewski, Steingass, Fritz and Schneider1979) using Hohenheim gas test (HGT; Makkar et al., Reference Makkar, Blümmel and Becker1995).

The syringes were placed in a rotor inside the incubator (39 °C) with about one rotation per minute. The GP was recorded after 48 h of incubation (GP48). Blanks were prepared by incubating syringes containing rumen fluid and buffer solution, but without any sample. Katuk leave samples were incubated in triplicate in two different in vitro incubation runs. The difference between the in vitro GP with and without PEG supplementation is an indicator of tannin effect. The increase in gas on addition of PEG is a measure of tannin activity, where the protocol used was similar to that described in Makkar et al. (Reference Makkar, Blümmel and Becker1995).

Fibre fractionation and in vitro fibre digestibility

The fibre fractionation and in vitro fibre digestibility experiment were evaluated using the modified Tilley and Terry technique (Tilley and Terry, Reference Tilley and Terry1963; Robertson and Van Soest, Reference Robertson, Van Soest, James and Theander1981). For this, rumen fluid was collected from two rumen-fistulated Jersey cows, fed on a total mixed ration containing grass silage (180 g/kg DM), corn silage (167 g/kg DM), grass hay (184 g/kg DM), barley straw (21 g/kg DM), and concentrate mixture (426 g/kg DM), urea (2 g/kg DM) and mineral mixture (20 g/kg DM). The total mixed ration had a forage to concentrate ratio of 55:45 (on DM basis) and contained 148 g CP/kg DM. Rumen fluid was collected immediately before morning feeding and strained through two layers of cheesecloth into pre-warmed and isolated bottle. All laboratory handling of rumen fluid was carried out under a continuous flow of CO2. The rumen fluid of both cows was mixed, homogenized and filtered using a nylon net (pore size 100 μm).

The ground initial sample (500 mg) was weighed into a 250 ml flask (Goering and Van Soest, Reference Goering and Van Soest1970). The rumen fluid (10 ml) and the buffer solution (40 ml) were added to each flask. The flasks were then placed in a preheated (39 °C) water bath under CO2 positive pressure to ensure anaerobiosis, and incubated for 240 h, which corresponds to the maximum extent of fibre digestion in an anaerobic environment in vitro (Fox et al., Reference Fox, Tedeschi, Tylutki, Russell, Van Amburgh, Chase, Pell and Overton2004; Raffrenato and Van Amburgh, Reference Raffrenato and Van Amburgh2010; Raffrenato et al., Reference Raffrenato, Ross and Van Amburgh2018). Re-inoculation of the flasks with 10 ml rumen fluid and 40 ml buffer solution was conducted after 120 h of incubation to preserve the microbial activity during the whole incubation process (Palmonari et al., Reference Palmonari, Fustini, Canestrari, Grilli and Formigoni2014). Blanks were prepared by incubating flasks containing buffer and rumen fluid but without any sample to correct for any feed particles introduced into the in vitro system with the rumen fluid (Raffrenato et al., Reference Raffrenato, Ross and Van Amburgh2018). Each sample was incubated in triplicate in two runs resulting in six observations per experimental diet.

At the end of the incubation, the whole content of each flask was moved to a 600 ml beaker that was covered by a round cold-water condenser to minimize evaporation (Mertens, Reference Mertens2002) and determine the aNDFom concentration of the residue (Goering and Van Soest, Reference Goering and Van Soest1970). About 0.5 g of sodium sulphite and 50 ml of neutral detergent solution were added to each refluxing beaker and refluxed for 60 min at boiling temperature to create vigorous particle movement. After refluxing, the content of each beaker was filtered through crucibles (40 μm porosity, Duran™ Borosilicate Glass Filter Crucibles number 2, DWK Life Sciences, Wertheim, Germany) and the water removed with a vacuum pump. Filtered residues were dried in a forced-air oven (105 °C) for 3 h, and the weights of the crucibles were recorded. Ash correction was done by incineration of the residue at 550 °C for 4 h.

The in vitro neutral detergent fibre digestibility (IVNDFD of the incubated samples after 240 h; IVNDFD240) was calculated as

(2)$${\rm IVNDF}{\rm D}_{ 240} = \displaystyle{{{\rm aNDFo}{\rm m}_{\rm r}{\rm \ndash aNDFo}{\rm m}_{\rm b}} \over {{\rm aNDFo}{\rm m}_{\rm i}}}$$

where aNDFomr is the residual aNDFom after 240 h in vitro fermentation (g/kg DM), aNDFomb is the blank correction after 240 h in vitro fermentation (g/kg DM) and aNDFomi represents the initial aNDFom concentration from samples (g/kg DM).

The uNDF concentration (g/kg DM) after 240 h in vitro fermentation (uNDF240) was calculated as

(3)$${\rm uND}{\rm F}_{ 240} \,( {{\rm g/kg\;DM}} ) = \displaystyle{{( {{\rm 1000\ndash IVNDF}{\rm D}_{ 240}} ) {\rm \;x\;aNDFo}{\rm m}_{\rm I}{\rm \;}} \over { 1000}}$$

where aNDFomi (g/kg DM) is the aNDFom concentration of the sample (g/kg DM) and IVNDFD240 is in vitro fibre digestibility (IVNDFD) of the incubated samples after 240 h.

The pdNDF concentration (g/kg DM) was calculated as

(4)$${\rm pdNDF\;}( {{\rm g/kg\;DM}} ) {\rm} = {\rm aNDFo}{\rm m}_{\rm i}{\rm \ndash \;uND}{\rm F}_{ 240}{\rm \;}$$

where aNDFomi (g/kg DM) is the aNDFom concentration of the sample (g/kg DM) and uNDF240 is the uNDF in the residue after 240 h in vitro fermentation (g/kg DM).

In vitro gas production, metabolizable energy and net energy for lactation

The HGT was performed according to Menke and Steingass (Reference Menke and Steingass1988) but modified regarding the incubation duration. Rumen fluid was collected from two castrated male adult Blackface sheep, fed on a standard diet of grass hay, a commercial compound feed and barley (650, 200 and 150 g/kg DM, respectively) that covered maintenance energy requirements. The animals never received tanniferous and/or tropical feeds before. Rumen fluid was collected immediately before feeding and strained through two layers of cheesecloth into pre-warmed and isolated bottle. All laboratory handling of rumen fluid was carried out under a continuous flow of CO2.

The ground samples (220–250 mg) of the air-dried feedstuffs and the respective mixtures were accurately weighed into 100 ml glass syringes and the syringe pistons were lubricated with Vaseline and inserted into the syringes. Triplicates of syringes without substrate (blanks) and of standard hay and concentrate were included as laboratory controls. According to Menke and Steingass (Reference Menke and Steingass1988), GP from the blank was subtracted from all samples incubated to obtain the net GP. Subsequently, GP from the hay standard was divided by the measured net value of the hay standard to provide the correction factor. Similarly, GP from the concentrate standard was divided by the measured net GP of the concentrate standard. The average value of correction factor and concentrate standard was used for the adjustment. Each sample was incubated in triplicate in two different in vitro incubation runs. Incubations were repeated when gas volumes of the standards deviated by more than 10% and when coefficient of variation between repetitions exceeded 5% from the reference values.

Syringes were filled with 30 ml of medium consisting of rumen fluid (10 ml) and 20 buffer solution (20 ml) as described by Menke and Steingass (Reference Menke and Steingass1988), except that the concentration of NaHCO3 was reduced to 33 g/l and that of (NH4)HCO3 increased to 6 g/l to prevent a shortage in N during prolonged incubation times. The syringes were placed in a rotor inside the incubator (39 °C) with about one rotation per minute. The GP was recorded after 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72 and 96 h of incubation. The ME and net energy for lactation (NEL) values were calculated according to Menke and Steingass (Reference Menke and Steingass1988) as:

(5)$${\rm ME} = 2 .20 + 0{\rm .1357\ GP} + 0{\rm .0057\ CP} + 0{\rm .0002859\ E}{\rm E}^ 2$$
(6)$${\rm NEL} = 0 .54 + 0{\rm .0959\ GP} + 0{\rm .0038\ CP} + 0{\rm .0001733\ E}{\rm E}^ 2$$

where GP is the net GP from 200 mg dry sample after 24 h of incubation (GP24) and after being corrected from its correction factor for the day-to-day variation in the activity of rumen fluid (ml) is expressed in ml/200 mg DM, and ash, CP and EE concentrations are expressed as g/kg DM.

Data analyses

To describe the dynamics of GP over time, the following Gompertz function (Schofield et al., Reference Schofield, Pitt and Pell1994) was chosen:

(7)$${\rm GP\ } = A{\rm \;exp\;}\left. {\left. {\left\{{-{\rm exp}\left[{1 + \displaystyle{b \over A}} \right.} \right.( {{\rm LAG}-t} ) } \right]} \right\}$$

where A is the theoretical maximum of GP, b is the maximum rate of GP (ml/h) that occurs at the point of inflection of the curve, LAG is the lag time (h) which is defined as the time-axis intercept of a tangent line at the point of inflection, and t is time (h). The parameters A, b and LAG were estimated by non-linear regression analysis (PROC NLIN; SAS 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA).

The fibre fractions, in vitro fibre digestibility, GP (i.e. 12, 24, 48 and 96 h of incubation), ME and NEL values were analysed using a mixed procedure (PROC MIXED) by SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.) according to:

(8)$$Y_{ijk} = \mu + \alpha _i + \beta _j + ( {\alpha \, \beta } ) _{ij} + R_k + e_{ijk}$$

where Yijk = the dependent variable; μ = the overall mean; αi = the effect of hays of different quality (i.e. LQH, MQH and HQH); βj = the inclusion levels of KL (i.e. 0, 50, 100 and 200 g/kg DM); (α β)ij = the interaction of grass hay with different quality and inclusion levels of KL; Rk = the random effect of run; and eijk = the residual error. Linear effects of level were tested by orthogonal polynomial contrasts using the CONTRAST statement. Differences between means with P < 0.050 were accepted as statistically significant, and differences with 0.050 < P < 0.100 were considered to represent tendencies to significance.

Results

Chemical composition

The calculated chemical composition varied among experimental diets (Table 1). Initial sample of KL had higher CP and NFC concentrations than experimental diets. Meanwhile, LQH diet without KL supplementation had lower CP and NFC concentrations among experimental diets. Initial sample of KL had lower aNDFom, ADFom, Lignin (sa), hemicelluloses and cellulose concentrations compared to experimental diets. Meanwhile, LQH diet without KL supplementation had higher aNDFom, ADFom Lignin (sa), hemicelluloses and cellulose concentrations compared to other experimental diets.

Fibre fractions and in vitro fibre digestibility

The concentrations of undigested aNDFom after 240 h incubation (uNDF240) and potentially digestible aNDFom (pdNDF; both in g/kg DM) as well as the fibre digestibility differed between the grass hays (i.e. LQH, MQH and HQH; P = <0.001 for all variables; Table 2). Moreover, the uNDF240 and pdNDF concentrations differed between levels of KL supplementation (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). The HQH supplemented with 200 g/kg DM basis of KL had a much lower uNDF240 concentration than other experimental diets. Meanwhile, MQH diet without supplementation of KL had highest pdNDF concentration and fibre digestibility among all experimental diets, i.e. MQH diet with KL supplementation, all LQH diet and all HQH diet. The interaction between grass hay with different quality and inclusion level of KL was significant for uNDF240 concentration (P = 0.014), but tended to be significant for fibre digestibility (P = 0.083). In all diets, uNDF240 and pdNDF concentrations linearly decreased with increasing level of KL in the diet (P < 0.01). Meanwhile, fibre digestibility linearly increased with increasing KL level in LQH diet, but not in MQH and HQH diets (P = 0.04).

Table 2. Calculated fibre fractions, i.e. uNDF240 and pdNDF (g/kg DM), and fibre digestibility, i.e. IVNDFD240, of the experimental diets (n = 3)

aNDFom, neutral detergent fibre assayed with a heat-stable amylase and expressed exclusive of residual ash; DM, dry matter; IVNDFD240, in vitro neutral detergent fibre digestibility of the incubated samples after 240 h; KL, Katuk leaves; pdNDF, potentially digestible neutral detergent fibre; SEM, standard error mean; uNDF240, undigested neutral detergent fibre estimated after 240 h of in vitro incubation.

a Probability of the effects of H, hays of different quality; L, inclusion levels of Katuk leaves; H×L, interaction of hays of different quality and inclusion levels of Katuk leaves; CL, linear effect of inclusion levels of Katuk leaves.

Tannin bioassay

Addition of PEG to KL did not affect the cumulative GP24 (Fig. 1), averaging 36 ml/200 mg DM. Similarly, the GP48 of KL did not differ irrespective of whether it was incubated with PEG or without PEG.

Figure 1. Effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) treatment on the cumulative gas production (ml/200 mg dry matter; DM) during 48 h (h) of incubation of Katuk leaves.

In vitro gas production, metabolizable energy and net energy for lactation

The cumulative GP differed between experimental diets at all incubation times, i.e. 12 h, 24 h, 48 h and 96 h (P < 0.001, for all variables; Table 3). Mean total GP during 12 h of incubation (GP12) ranged from 21.9 to 35.7 ml/200 mg DM. The interaction between grass hay with different quality and inclusion level of KL was significant for GP12 (P = 0.007). In all experimental diets, GP12 did not linearly increase with increasing of KL supplementation in the diet (P = 0.410).

Table 3. Kinetics cumulative gas production of the experimental diets (n = 3)

DM, dry matter; GP, gas production; GP12, gas production during 12 h of incubation; GP24, gas production during 24 h of incubation; GP48, gas production during 48 h of incubation; GP96, gas production during 96 h of incubation; KL, Katuk leaves; SEM, standard error mean.

a A, theoretical maximum of gas production (ml/200 mg dry matter); b, maximum rate of gas production (ml/h) that occurs at the point of inflection of the curve; LAG, lag time (h), which is defined as the time-axis intercept of a tangent line at the point of inflection; t, time (h). Probability of the effects of H, hays of different quality; L, inclusion levels of Katuk leaves; H×L, interaction of hays of different quality and inclusion levels of Katuk leaves; CL, linear effect of inclusion levels of Katuk leaves.

Total volume of GP24 ranged from 33.3 to 49.6 ml/200 mg DM. The interaction between grass hay with different quality and inclusion level of KL was significant for GP24 (P = 0.004). In LQH diets, GP24 linearly increased with increasing of KL supplementation in the diet (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, GP24 linearly decreased with increasing of KL supplementation in MQH and HQH diets (P < 0.001).

Total volume of GP48 ranged from 42.6 to 57.6 ml/200 mg DM. There was no interaction between grass hay with different quality and inclusion level of KL for GP48 (P = 0.101). In all experimental diets, GP48 linearly decreased with increasing of KL supplementation in the diet (P < 0.001).

Total volume of gas produced during 96 h (GP96) ranged from 48.4 to 62.2 ml/200 mg DM. There was no interaction between grass hay with different quality and inclusion level of KL for GP96 (P = 0.410). In all experimental diets, GP96 linearly decreased with increasing level of KL in the diet (P < 0.001).

The ME and NEL values of experimental diets varied widely (Table 4). The calculated ME and NEL values differed between experimental diets (P < 0.001, for all variables). The interaction between grass hay with different quality and inclusion level of KL affected ME and NEL values (P < 0.01, P = 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). In LQH diets, ME tended to linearly increase with increasing of KL supplementation in the diet (P = 0.078). Meanwhile, ME tended to linearly decrease with increasing of KL supplementation in MQH and HQH diets (P < 0.01). In all experimental diets, NEL was not observed to linearly increase or decrease with increasing of KL supplementation in the diet (P = 0.161).

Table 4. Calculated metabolizable energy (MJ/kg DM) and net energy for lactation concentrations of the experimental diets (MJ/kg DM)

DM, dry matter; KL, Katuk leaves; ME, metabolizable energy; NEL, net energy for lactation; SEM, standard error mean.

a Probability of the effects of H, hays of different quality; L, inclusion levels of Katuk leaves; H×L, interaction of hays of different quality and inclusion levels of Katuk leaves; CL, linear effect of inclusion levels of Katuk leaves.

Discussion

Chemical composition

According to the results of this study, KL had higher CP concentration (333 g/kg DM) than the three hays (i.e. LQH, MQH and HQH), which were grasses from temperate region. The CP concentration of KL was also greater than mean CP concentrations of tropical grasses and tropical forage legumes as determined in a previous study (79 and 198 g/kg DM, respectively; Nurdianti et al., Reference Nurdianti, Dickhöfer and Castro-Montoya2019). Piliang and Djojosoebagio (Reference Piliang and Djojosoebagio1991) reported a CP concentration of KL of about 257 g/kg DM. Meanwhile, Yang and Guo (Reference Yang and Guo2002) found that CP concentration of KL grown in South China reached up to 485 g/kg DM. Moreover, a study from Naveena et al. (Reference Naveena, Janavi, Arumugam and Anitha2020) has been conducted to evaluate the nutritional composition of basal whorl leaves and terminal whorl leaves of Katuk which reported that basal whorl leaves are more enriched with nutrients than terminal whorl leaves. The authors further mentioned that the CP concentration of KL increased with the age of the plant. The present research and some previous studies showed that CP concentrations of KL exceed the requirements of ruminants, for instance, of small ruminants for maintenance and growth (110–130 g/kg DM of CP concentration; National Research Council, 2007) and even of dairy cattle for maintenance and lactation (119 g/kg DM of CP concentration; National Research Council, 2001), which makes it valuable as high-protein supplement particularly to low-protein forage diets.

The aNDFom concentration of KL was lower than of the three hays (i.e. LQH, MQH and HQH) in the present study and those reported for tropical forage legumes or tropical grasses in the literature (374 and 592 g/kg DM, respectively; Nurdianti et al., Reference Nurdianti, Dickhöfer and Castro-Montoya2019). Hence, supplementing KL would decrease the aNDFom concentration in the high-fibre diets. Villalba et al. (Reference Villalba, Ates and MacAdam2021) mentioned that NFC is also important in the ruminant nutrition as it can offer energy adequately for an efficient microbial protein synthesis (Shabi et al., Reference Shabi, Arieli, Bruckental, Aharoni, Zamwel, Bor and Tagari1998). The present study reported that supplementation of KL in the diet can increase NFC concentration in all experimental diets. Batajoo and Shaver (Reference Batajoo and Shaver1994) summarized that for cows producing over 40 kg of milk, the diet should contain NFC concentration about more than 300 g/kg DM, yet little benefit was reported if the diets contain 420 g/kg DM over 360 g/kg DM of NFC concentration. In previous study, Villalba et al. (Reference Villalba, Ates and MacAdam2021) mentioned that the decreased dietary fibre and increased NFC concentration might lead to increased intake, increased meat and milk in ruminant production and decreased methane enteric emissions and carbon dioxide. The present study showed that KL inclusion can increase CP and NFC concentrations, while reducing aNDFom concentrations in ruminant diets based on forage grasses, and that it may thus be a valuable supplement.

Tannin bioassay

According to Makkar et al. (Reference Makkar, Blümmel and Becker1995), PEG might bind to tannins and thereby reduce their anti-nutritive activity. In response to the deactivation of secondary compounds, nutrient fermentation might improve and in vitro GP might increase (Batajoo and Shaver, Reference Batajoo and Shaver1994; Nocek, Reference Nocek1997). The greater the increase in the GP, the higher the suppressive activity of tannin in the feeds (Jayanegara et al., Reference Jayanegara, Togtokhbayar, Makkar and Becker2009).

A study of Selvi and Bhaskar (Reference Selvi and Bhaskar2012) reported that the KL contain substances such as sterols, resins, tannins, saponins, alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, cardiac glycosides, phenols and catechols. Previous studies reported that KL contain per 88.7 mg tannins (Singh et al., Reference Singh, Singh, Salim, Srivastava, Singh and Srivastava2011) and 580 mg alkaloid papaverine (Bender and Ismail, Reference Bender and Ismail1975; Padmavathi and Rao, Reference Padmavathi and Rao1990) per 100 g DM of KL, as well as 11.5 mg gallic acid equivalents of total phenolics and 10.4 mg rutin equivalents of total flavonoids (Maisuthisakul et al., Reference Maisuthisakul, Pasuk and Ritthiruangdej2008) per gram db. However, in contrast to these results, the present study showed that PEG addition did not increase GP of KL indicating that KL did not contain a considerable amount of tannins.

Fibre fractions and in vitro fibre digestibility

Fibre digestibility is important in assessing forage quality (Ward, Reference Ward2001). Fibre digestibility and pdNDF concentration can be calculated by subtracting the uNDF240 concentration from total aNDFom concentration (Cotanch et al., Reference Cotanch, Grant, Van Amburgh, Zontini, Fustini, Palmonari and Formigoni2014; Nurdianti et al., Reference Nurdianti, Dickhöfer and Castro-Montoya2019). The uNDF240 concentration is the functional fibre fraction that influences physical effectiveness, gut fill and digestion/passage dynamics of forages (Cotanch et al., Reference Cotanch, Grant, Van Amburgh, Zontini, Fustini, Palmonari and Formigoni2014; Harper and McNeill, Reference Harper and McNeill2015). Fustini et al. (Reference Fustini, Palmonari, Canestrari, Bonfante, Mammi, Pacchioli, Sniffen, Grant, Cotanch and Formigoni2017) reported that voluntary feed intake is influenced and improved by forage fibre digestibility and its pdNDF concentration (when it represents up to 500 g/kg DM basis of the ration).

The uNDF240 concentration of KL in the present study was much lower than reported for tropical forage legumes and grasses (294 and 231 g/kg DM; Nurdianti et al., Reference Nurdianti, Dickhöfer and Castro-Montoya2019). On the other hand, the pdNDF concentration of KL interestingly was much higher compared to tropical forage legumes and grasses (134 and 360 g/kg DM, respectively; Nurdianti et al., Reference Nurdianti, Dickhöfer and Castro-Montoya2019), which shows that fibre of KL is more digestible than that of other tropical forages. Therefore, the inclusion of KL in diets with hays of different quality decreased the concentration of uNDF240, but might increase the fibre digestibility of the diet.

In vitro gas production, metabolizable energy and net energy for lactation

In the exponential model, the GP rate depends on substrate availability for fermentation after a lag time has been reached (Ørskov and McDonald, Reference Ørskov and McDonald1979; McDonald, Reference McDonald1981). According to López et al. (Reference López, Dhanoa, Dijkstra, Bannink, Kebreab and France2007), the lag time might be affected by some factors such as the nature of the feedstuff incubated, the microbial species inoculated and the quantity of inoculum added. In the present study, the Gompertz model was the most suitable curve shapes until the end of incubation. According to Lavrenčič et al. (Reference Lavrenčič, Stefanon and Susmel1997), the Gompertz model assumes that the specific GP rate is proportional to microbial mass, which in turn depends on the concentration of digestible substrate. Moreover, the present study showed negative lag time which is similar to the finding of Jijai et al. (Reference Jijai, Srisuwan, O-Thong, Norli and Siripatana2016) which indicates that the accelerated growth of the initial anaerobic process in most batches was facilitated by favourable substrate conditions, resulting in a significant reduction in the time required to reach the exponential phase.

Related to gas volume and in vitro GP characteristics, Menke et al. (Reference Menke, Raab, Salewski, Steingass, Fritz and Schneider1979) suggested that GP24 has indirect relationship with organic matter digestibility and ME in feedstuffs due to the stochiometric relationships between organic matter degradation, short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) yield and GP. Therefore, ME and SCFA yield may be predicted from in vitro GP (Batajoo and Shaver, Reference Batajoo and Shaver1994). Yet, GP derived from protein fermentation is relatively small as compared to that from carbohydrate fermentation (Makkar, Reference Makkar2004). Hence, the high CP concentration of KL in the present study rather than a poor substrate degradability might have contributed to their low GP as well as the linear decline with increasing KL inclusion level in the grass hay diet.

The estimation of the ME values can be used for the purpose of ration formulation and for other purposes in setting economic value of feeds (Getachew et al., Reference Getachew, Crovetto, Fondevila, Krishnamoorthy, Singh, Spanghero, Steingass, Robinson and Kailas2002). The ME value of KL was 9.52 MJ/kg DM which is good compared with typical values of feedstuffs commonly fed to cattle, such as alfalfa, barley silage, corn silage, cotton seed and sorghum silage (8.20, 8.49, 9.74 and 7.49 MJ/kg DM, respectively; National Research Council, 2001) which can give benefit economically when supplementing KL in the diet. Meanwhile, the NEL value of KL was 5.62 MJ/kg DM which is sufficient as compared to some feedstuffs commonly fed to cattle, such as alfalfa and barley grain (6.36 and 7.78 MJ/kg DM, respectively; National Research Council, 2001).

Conclusion

Katuk leaves have relatively high CP concentrations with low concentration of well digestible fibre. There was no indication that KL contained a considerable amount of tannins, hampering carbohydrate fermentation. In LQH diets, increasing KL supplementation linearly increases GP24 and calculated ME, with no or even negative effects in MQH and HQH diets. Hence, KL can be a potential supplement feed for ruminant livestock, in particular when fed in addition to LQH. However, further studies (e.g. in vitro or in vivo) investigating other rumen parameters after incubation are needed to validate the current observations.

Acknowledgements

The study of the first author was funded by Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education) Scholarship, Indonesia. The proximate analyses and in vitro HGT were performed at the Institute of Animal Science of the University of Bonn, Germany. The fibre digestibility was determined at the Department of Animal Nutrition and Rangeland Management in the Tropics and Subtropics (490i) of Institute of Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics (Hans-Ruthenberg Institute) of the University of Hohenheim, Germany and we appreciate the supply of rumen fluid by the Institute of Animal Science of the University of Hohenheim, Germany. We appreciate the technical assistance and resources of all working groups during laboratory works.

Author contributions

R. R. N., K.-H. S. and C. B. conceived and designed the study. R. R. N. conducted the experiments and data gathering. R. R. N. owned the study and research funds. R. R. N. and C. B. performed statistical analyses. K.-H. S. and U. D. provided the research facilities. R. R. N., K.-H. S., C. B., A. H. and R. S. N. provided the samples. K.-H. S., C. B., U. D., A. J., D. R., I. H., A. H. and R. S. N. reviewed the paper. K.-H. S. and C. B. supervised the research. R. R. N. wrote the original article and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the final version of the manuscript.

Financial support

The study of the first author was funded by Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education) Scholarship, Indonesia.

Competing interests

None.

Ethical standards

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of Institute of Animal Science of the University of Bonn and the Institute of Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics (Hans-Ruthenberg Institute) of the University of Hohenheim. All procedures for animal handling within the present study were performed according to the National Committee for the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes for the Federal Republic of Germany.

References

Batajoo, KK and Shaver, RD (1994) Impact of nonfiber carbohydrate on intake, digestion, and milk production by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 15801588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bender, AE and Ismail, KS (1975) Nutritive value & toxicity of a Malaysian food, Sauropus albicans. Plants Foods for Man 1, 139143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BMKG (2013) Pusat Database Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, Dan Geofisika. Bandung, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Cotanch, KW, Grant, RJ, Van Amburgh, ME, Zontini, A, Fustini, M, Palmonari, A and Formigoni, A (2014) Applications of uNDF in ration modeling and formulation. In Cornell Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers, New York, USA, 21st October 2014, p. Ithaca, New York, USA: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization (2014) Dairy production and products: cattle. http://www.fao.org/dairy-production-products/production/dairy-animals/cattle/en/Google Scholar
Fox, DG, Tedeschi, LO, Tylutki, TP, Russell, JB, Van Amburgh, ME, Chase, LE, Pell, AN and Overton, TR (2004) The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. Animal Feed Science and Technology 112, 2978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fustini, M, Palmonari, A, Canestrari, G, Bonfante, E, Mammi, L, Pacchioli, MT, Sniffen, GCJ, Grant, RJ, Cotanch, KW and Formigoni, A (2017) Effect of undigested neutral detergent fiber content of alfalfa hay on lactating dairy cows: feeding behavior, fiber digestibility, and lactation performance. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 44754483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geremew, G, Negesse, T and Abebe, A (2017) Assessment of availability and nutritive values of feed resources and their contribution to livestock nutrient requirements in Chire district, Southern Ethiopia. Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access 7, 0011400118.Google Scholar
Getachew, G, Crovetto, GM, Fondevila, M, Krishnamoorthy, U, Singh, B, Spanghero, M, Steingass, H, Robinson, PH and Kailas, MM (2002) Laboratory variation of 24 h in vitro gas production and estimated metabolizable energy values of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 102, 169180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goering, HK and Van Soest, PJ (1970) Forage Fiber Analyses: (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications). Washington, DC, USA: Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Harper, KJ and McNeill, D (2015) The role iNDF in the regulation of feed intake and the importance of its assessment in subtropical ruminant systems (the role of iNDF in the regulation of forage intake). Agriculture 5, 778790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayanegara, A, Togtokhbayar, N, Makkar, HPS and Becker, K (2009) Tannins determined by various methods as predictors of methane production reduction potential of plants by an in vitro rumen fermentation system. Animal Feed Science and Technology 150, 230237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jijai, S, Srisuwan, G, O-Thong, S, Norli, I and Siripatana, C (2016) Effect of substrate and granules/inocula sizes on biochemical methane potential and methane kinetics. Iranica Journal of Energy & Environment 7, 94101.Google Scholar
Lavrenčič, A, Stefanon, B and Susmel, P (1997) An evaluation of the Gompertz model in degradability studies of forage chemical components. Animal Science 64, 423431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, S, Dhanoa, MS, Dijkstra, J, Bannink, A, Kebreab, E and France, J (2007) Some methodological and analytical considerations regarding application of the gas production technique. Animal Feed Science and Technology 135, 139156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maisuthisakul, P, Pasuk, S and Ritthiruangdej, P (2008) Relationship between antioxidant properties and chemical composition of some Thai plants. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 21, 229240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkar, HPS (2004) Assessing Quality and Safety of Animal Feeds (Ed S. Jutzi). Rome, Italy: FAO.Google Scholar
Makkar, HPS, Blümmel, M and Becker, K (1995) In vitro effects of and interactions between tannins and saponins and fate of tannins in the rumen. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 69, 481493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, I (1981) A revised model for the estimation of protein degradability in the rumen. The Journal of Agricultural Science 96, 251252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menke, KH and Steingass, H (1988) Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Resources Development 28, 755.Google Scholar
Menke, KH, Raab, L, Salewski, A, Steingass, H, Fritz, D and Schneider, W (1979) The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feeding stuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. The Journal of Agricultural Science 93, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, DR (2002) Measuring fiber and its effectiveness in ruminant diets. In Plains Nutrition Council: Spring Conference, San Antonio, USA, 25th-26th April 2002, pp. 40–66. San Antonio, USA: Texas A&M Research and Extension Center.Google Scholar
Nasser, MEA, El-Waziry, AM and Sallam, SMA (2009) In vitro gas production measurements and estimated energy value and microbial protein to investigate associative effects of untreated or biological treated linen straw and berseem hay. In Nutritional and Foraging Ecology of Sheep and Goats, Thessaloniki, Greece, 11st–13rd October 2007 (Ed P. Papach ristou, T.G., Parissi, Z.M., Ben Salem, H., Morand-Fehr), pp. 261–266. Montpellier, France: Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerranéennes.Google Scholar
National Research Council (2001) Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle: seventh revised edition, 2001, 7th ed (Eds Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, Subcommittee on Dairy Cattle Nutrition, & Committee on Animal Nutrition). Washington DC, USA: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council (2007) Nutrient requirements of small ruminant: sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids, 4th ed (Eds Committee on Nutrient Requirement of Small Ruminants, Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources, & Division on Earth and Life Studies). Washington DC, USA: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Naveena, E, Janavi, GJ, Arumugam, T and Anitha, T (2020) Estimation of nutritive composition of Sauropus androgynus (multivitamin plant) at different growth stages and position of leaves. International Journal of Chemical Studies 8, 443447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noach, YR, Handayani, HT and Henuk, YL (2020) Birth weight, milk production, and milk quality of Ettawah grade goat at first kidding period supplemented with concentrate contained katuk (Sauropus androgynous) leaf flour and Zn bio complex. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, p. 012060. IOP Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nocek, JE (1997) Bovine acidosis: implications on laminitis. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 10051028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nurdianti, RR, Südekum, KH and Böttger, C (2017) In vitro rumen fermentation of Sauropus androgynus (L.) Merr. compared to hays of different quality. In Tropentag 2017 – Future Agriculture: socio-ecological transitions and bio-cultural shifts, Bonn, Germany, 20th–22nd September 2017 (Ed E. Tielkes), p. 363. Göttingen, Germany: Cuvillier Verlag.Google Scholar
Nurdianti, RR, Dickhöfer, U and Castro-Montoya, JM (2019) Evaluation of undigested and potential digestible fiber in tropical grasses and tropical legumes. In Tropentag 2019 – Filling gaps and removing traps for sustainable resource management, Kassel, Germany, 18th–20th September 2019 (Ed E. Tielkes), p. 217. Göttingen, Germany: Cuvillier Verlag.Google Scholar
Ørskov, ER and McDonald, I (1979) The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. The Journal of Agricultural Science 92, 499503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padmavathi, P and Rao, MP (1990) Nutritive value of Sauropus androgynus leaves. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 40, 107113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmonari, A, Fustini, M, Canestrari, G, Grilli, E and Formigoni, A (2014) Influence of maturity on alfalfa hay nutritional fractions and indigestible fiber content. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 77297734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paul, M and Beena Anto, K (2011) Antibacterial activity of Sauropus androgynus (L.) Merr. International Journal of Plant Sciences 6, 189192.Google Scholar
Piliang, WG and Djojosoebagio, S (1991) Fisiologi Nutrisi (Ed IPB). Bogor, Indonesia: Depdikbud.Google Scholar
Raffrenato, E and Van Amburgh, M (2010) Development of a mathematical model to predict sizes and rates of digestion of a fast and slow degrading pool and the indigestible NDF fraction. In Cornell Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers, New York, USA, 19th–21st October 2010, pp. 52–65. NY, USA, 2010.Google Scholar
Raffrenato, E, Ross, DA and Van Amburgh, ME (2018) Development of an in vitro method to determine rumen undigested aNDFom for use in feed evaluation. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 98889900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinne, M, Jaakkola, S and Huhtanen, P (1997) Grass maturity effects on cattle fed silage-based diets. 1. Organic matter digestion, rumen fermentation and nitrogen utilization. Animal Feed Science and Technology 67, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, JB and Van Soest, PJ (1981) The detergent system of analysis and its applications to human foods. In James, WPT and Theander, O (eds), The Analysis of Dietary Fiber in Food. New York, USA: Marcel Dekker, pp. 123158.Google Scholar
Salamatazar, M, Salamatdoust-nobar, R and Sis, NM (2012) Evaluation of the effects of Thymus vulgar on degradability kinetics of canola meal for ruminant using in vitro gas production technique. Journal of Cell and Animal Biology 6, 164168.Google Scholar
Sa'roni, S, Sadjiman, T, Sja'bani, M and Zulaela, Z (2012) Effectiveness of the Sauropus androgynus (L.) Merr leaf extract in increasing mother's breast milk production. Media Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan 14, 2024.Google Scholar
Schofield, P, Pitt, RE and Pell, AN (1994) Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production. Journal of Animal Science 72, 29802991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selvi, VS and Bhaskar, A (2012) Characterization of anti-inflammatory activities and antinociceptive effects of papaverine from Sauropus androgynus (L.) Merr. Global Journal of Pharmacology 6, 186192.Google Scholar
Shabi, Z, Arieli, A, Bruckental, I, Aharoni, Y, Zamwel, S, Bor, A and Tagari, H (1998) Effect of the synchronization of the degradation of dietary crude protein and organic matter and feeding frequency on ruminal fermentation and flow of digesta in the abomasum of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 19912000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, S, Singh, DR, Salim, KM, Srivastava, A, Singh, LB and Srivastava, RC (2011) Estimation of proximate composition, micronutrients and phytochemical compounds in traditional vegetables from Andaman and Nicobar Islands. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 62, 765773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommart, K, Parker, DS, Rowlinson, P and Wanapat, M (2000) Fermentation characteristics and microbial protein synthesis in an in vitro system using cassava, rice straw and dried Ruzi grass as substrates. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 13, 10841093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taghizadeh, A, Palangi, V and Safamehr, A (2008) Determining nutritive values of alfalfa cuts using in situ and gas production techniques. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences 3, 8590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, JMA and Terry, RA (1963) A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass and Forage Science 18, 104111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verband Deutscher Landwirtschaftlicher Untersuchungs- und Forschungsanstalten (2007) VDLUFA-Methodenbuch: Bd. III Die Chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. Darmstadt, Germany: VDLUFA-Verlag.Google Scholar
Villalba, JJ, Ates, S and MacAdam, JW (2021) Non-fiber carbohydrates in forages and their influence on beef production systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 5, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, RT (2001) NDF digestibility and its use in predicting forage quality.Google Scholar
Yang, C and Guo, JX (2002) South China wild vegetable nutritive composition. Food Science 11, 121125.Google Scholar
Zhang, Bd, Cheng, Jx, Zhang, Cf, Bai, Yd, Liu, Wy, Li, W, Koike, K, Akihisa, T, Feng, F and Zhang, J (2020) Sauropus androgynus L. Merr. – a phytochemical, pharmacological and toxicological review. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 257, 112778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Ingredient composition and calculated chemical composition (n = 2) of the experimental diets

Figure 1

Table 2. Calculated fibre fractions, i.e. uNDF240 and pdNDF (g/kg DM), and fibre digestibility, i.e. IVNDFD240, of the experimental diets (n = 3)

Figure 2

Figure 1. Effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG) treatment on the cumulative gas production (ml/200 mg dry matter; DM) during 48 h (h) of incubation of Katuk leaves.

Figure 3

Table 3. Kinetics cumulative gas production of the experimental diets (n = 3)

Figure 4

Table 4. Calculated metabolizable energy (MJ/kg DM) and net energy for lactation concentrations of the experimental diets (MJ/kg DM)