Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:27:23.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the capillary rise of water in soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Bernard A. Keen
Bernard A. Keen
Affiliation:
(Goldsmiths' Company's Soil Physicist, Rothamsted Experimental Station.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Very diverse views are expressed on the height to which water can rise in soils under the forces of capillarity. Alway and MacDole in the course of a brief historical review, point out that these estimates range from two or three feet only, to as much as two or three kilometres, although the majority do not exceed 200 feet. Most of the investigators who advance a high value for the capillary rise are careful to point out that in all probability the movement of water in this case would be exceedingly slow, owing to the excessive friction in the minute capillary spaces. Actual experiments on the rise of water in tubes of compacted soil result in low values, which are in all probability exceeded in the field. Warington in his book Physical Properties of Soil gives a typical table showing the results of Loughridgeb for Californian soils.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , October 1919 , pp. 396 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1919

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 396 note a Journ. Agric. Res. 9 (1917), p. 27.Google Scholar

page 396 note b Californian Expt. Sta. Rep. (1892–4), p. 91.

page 397 note a Journ. Agric. Sci. 4 (1911–1912), p. 304.Google Scholar

page 397 note b Landw. Jahrb. 30 (1901), p. 361.Google Scholar

page 397 note c King, and Slichter, , 19th Ann. Rep. U.S. Geol. Survey (1899), pt 2.Google Scholar

page 398 note a See for instance Poynting and Thomson, Properties of Matter, 4th ed. 1907, p. 141, where the calculation is given for a circular tube. Exactly the same principle holds for a triangular tube.