Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:18:21.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moisture, its accumulation and site of evaporation in the coats of sweating cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. E. Allen ,
J. W. Bennettf ,
Susan M. Donegan  and
J. C. D. Hutchinson
T. E. Allen
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Genetics, C.S.I.B.O., McMaster Field Station, Liverpool, N.S.W.
J. W. Bennettf
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Physiology, C.S.I.R.O., The Ian Olunies Rosa Animal Research Laboratory, Prospect, N.S.W.
Susan M. Donegan
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Genetics, C.S.I.B.O., McMaster Field Station, Liverpool, N.S.W.
J. C. D. Hutchinson
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Physiology, C.S.I.R.O., The Ian Olunies Rosa Animal Research Laboratory, Prospect, N.S.W.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Moisture content of the coats of cattle, expressed as the percentage of the dry weight of hair, has been measured in a wide variety of environmental conditions in summer, springand winter. Strips of coat were clipped from 25 Jersey, 15 Zebu x Jersey crossbred and 9 Hereford heifers in a shed, in a climate room under warm, hot dry and hot humid conditions and outdoors both in sun and shade. Moisture content, weight of coat per unit area, depth of coat, skin and rectal temperatures, sweating and respiratory rates, air temperatures and vapour pressures were measured.

The mean moisture content of the coats varied in the different environments from 5·8 to 27·5 % and mean sweating rates from 28 to 438 g m-2 h-1. Moisturein summer coats out of doors in the sun averaged 11·2% and was about the same as that outof doors in the shade. In the shed, coat moisture was also low (average 11·8%) and amounted to less than half of the moisture content of clipped hair in equilibrium with a near saturated atmosphere. Herefords that had been fed a low plane ration from winter to summer, retained their long winter coats and these, in summer, had only half the moisture content of the short coats of normally fed Herefords. In the hot room, the moisture content of summer coats was usually higher than out of doors and varied around 18%.

The inner part of the coat had more moisture than the outer part and estimates of moisture gradients were made. Calculation of the contribution of sweating to total moisture in indoor environments showed that, at rapid rates of sweating, it was about 8% and was higher in winter andspring coats than in summer coats (Fig. 3). It was estimated that sun and wind reduced the moisture content of summer coats by about 3% in outdoor summer environments. The effect of sun and wind on moisture content of winter coats in the same environment was estimated at nearly 9%.

The results suggest that the site of evaporation was at the skin except in very hot humid indoor environments when some free moisture may have been present in the hair.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 74 , Issue 2 , April 1970 , pp. 247 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, T. E. (1962). Responses of Zebu, Jersey and Zebu x Jersey crossbred heifers to rising temperatures. Aust. J. agric. Res. 13, 166–79.Google Scholar
Allen, T. E., Bennett, J. W., Donegan, S. M. & Hutchinson, J. C. D. (1964). Moisture in the eoats of sweating cattle. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 5, 167–72.Google Scholar
Allen, T. E. & Bligh, J. (1969). The temporal patterns of cutaneous water vapour loss from several mammalian species with epitrichial sweat glands. Corny. Biochem. Physiol. 31, 347–64.Google Scholar
Bedford, T. (1948). Basic Principles of Ventilation and Heating, p. 23. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. W. (1964). Thermal insulation of cattle coats. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 5, 160–6.Google Scholar
Bligh, J. (1961). The synchronous discharge of aprocrine sweat glands of the Welsh Mountain sheep. Nature, Lond. 189, 582–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, A. C. & Edholm, O. G. (1955). Man in a Cold Environment, p. 51. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Cassie, A. B. D. (1955). Wool Research. Vol. 2. Physical Properties of Wool Fibres and Fabrics. Leeds: Wool Industries Research Association.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, J. C. D. & Brown, G. D. (1969). Penetrance of cattle coats by radiation. J. appl. Physiol. 26, 454–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maopherson, R. K. (1960). Physiological responses to hot environments. Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun. no. 298, p. 313. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Mclean, J. A. (1963a). Measurement of cutaneous moisture vaporization from cattle by ventilated capsules. J. Physiol. Lond. 167, 417–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclean, J. A. (1963b). The regional distribution of cutaneous moisture vaporization in the Ayrshire calf. J. agric. Sci. Camb. 61, 275–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Y. S., Donegan, S. M. & Hayman, R. H. (1969). Sweating rate at different body regions in cattle and its correlation with some quantitative components of sweat glands volume for a given area of skin. Aust. J. agric. Res. 20, 395–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleger, A. V. & Turner, H. G. (1965). Sweating rates of cattle in the field and their reaction to diurnal and seasonal changes. Aust. J. agric. Res. 16, 92–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speaxman, J. B. (1944). An analysis of the water absorption isotherm of wool. Trans. Faraday Soc. 40, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, H. G. (1962). Effect of clipping the coaton performance of calves in the field. Aust. J. agric. Res. 13, 180–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waites, G. M. H. & Voglmayr, J. K. (1962). Apocrine sweat glands of the scrotum of the ram. Nature, Lond. 196, 965–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattes, G. M. H. & Voglmayr, J. K. (1963). The functional activity and control of the apoorine sweat glands of the scrotum of the ram. Aust. J. agric. Res. 14, 839–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whelan, M. E., Machattie, L. E., Goodings, A. C. & Turl, L. H. (1955). The diffusion of water vapour through laminae with particular reference to textile fabrics. Part HI: The resistance of fabrics to the passage of water vapour by diffusion. Text. Res. J. 25, 214–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M. (1955). Photoperiodicity in cattle. I. Seasonal changes in coat characteristics and their importance in heat regulation. Aust. J. agric. Res. 6, 891–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar