Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T20:45:16.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mixtures of annual legumes and small-grained cereals for forage production under low rainfall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. N. Droushiotis
D. N. Droushiotis
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two small-grained cereals, Mulga oats and a triticale line, and two legumes, local vetch and local peas, were grown in pure stands and in mixtures at various cereal: legume seed ratios (20:80, 40:60, 60:40 and 80:20) for three successive cropping years, 1981/82 to 1983/84, at Laxia and Dromolaxia, Cyprus, in each year.

The cereal pure stands produced, on average, more dry matter, 8·40 t/ha, and more digestible organic matter, 4·12 t/ha, than the legume pure stands, 3·68 and 2·18 t/ha, respectively. On average, total dry matter production decreased linearly as the seed proportion of the legume component in the mixture increased. The proportion of the legume in the harvested material was much lower than expected from the seed ratios. The highest proportion of legume was seen in the mixtures of peas with triticale and ranged from 8·1 to 35·5% at the various sowing rates. Digestibility and crude protein content were highest in the mixtures of triticale and peas.

Type
Review
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 113 , Issue 2 , October 1989 , pp. 249 - 253
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Donald, C. M. (1963). Competition among crop and pasture plants. Advances in Agronomy 15, 1–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droushiotis, D. N. (1984). The effect of variety and harvesting stage on forage production of barley in a low-rainfall environment. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 289–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droushiotis, D. N. (1985). Effect of variety and harvesting stage on forage production of vetch in a low rainfall environment. Field Crops Research 10, 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebelhar, S. A., Frye, W. W. & Blevins, R. L. (1984). Nitrogen from legume cover crops for no-tillage corn. Agronomy Journal 76, 51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1973). Production of forage from cereals, legumes and their mixtures under rainfed conditions in Cyprus. Technical Bulletin, No. 14, 18 pp. Cyprus Agricultural Research Institute.Google Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1976). Effect of harvesting stage on cereal and legume forage production in low rainfall regions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osman, A. E. & Nersoyan, N. (1986). Effect of the proportion of species on the yield and quality of forage mixtures, and on the yield of barley in the following year. Experimental Agriculture 22, 345–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osman, A. E. & Osman, A. M. (1982). Performance of mixtures of cereals and legume forages under irrigation in the Sudan. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 98, 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papastylianou, J. (1987). Effect of preceding legume or cereal on barley grain and nitrogen yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108, 623–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papastylianou, J. (1988). Nitrogen fixation by forage legumes grown in pure stands and in mixtures with cereals. In Final report on research contract 3074/IG, International Atomic Energy Agency. Vienna: IAEA.Google Scholar
Papastylianou, J. & Puckridge, D. W. (1983). Stem nitrate nitrogen and yield of wheat in a permanent rotation experiment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 34, 599–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papastylianou, J., Puckridge, D. W. & Carder, E. D. (1981). Nitrogen nutrition of cereals in a short-term rotation. I. Single season treatments as a source of nitrogen for subsequent cereal crops. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 703–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papastylianou, J. & Samios, T. (1987). Comparison of rotations in which barley for grain follows woollypod vetch and forage barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108, 609–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two stage technique for the in vitrodigestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenbath, B. (1974). Biomass productivity of mixtures. Advances in Agronomy 26, 177–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar