Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:33:29.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnesium deficiency in some crop plants in relation to the level of potassium nutrition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Thomas Walsh
Affiliation:
University College, Dublin
Thomas F. O'Donohoe
Affiliation:
University College, Dublin

Extract

While numerous studies have demonstrated the essential role of magnesium in the normal development of plants, the information as to the soil conditions governing the availability of this nutrient is relatively limited. In general it is considered that a true lack of magnesium in the soil, such as might result from leaching or overcropping, is the main cause of magnesium deficiency in plants. This aspect of the problem has received considerable attention (Imp. Bureau, 1940). It has become evident in recent years, however, that the absorption of magnesium by plants may be depressed under the influence of an excess of other nutrients, notably potassium and calcium, in the soil. In some instances this has been noted to result in the onset of magnesium deficiency in plants, despite an apparently adequate concentration of this element in an easily available form in the soil as shown by chemical methods.

The literature having a bearing on the inducement of magnesium deficiency in this manner has been reviewed by Walsh & Clarke (1944). These workers, from a study of magnesium deficiency chlorosis in tomatoes, showed that it was induced by heavy dressings of potassium causing a depression in magnesium uptake. While the effect of potassium alone in this respect was sufficient to induce the deficiency, it was also found that the sulphate radical played a prominent part. Where potassium was added other than in the form of the sulphate salt, the onset of the chlorosis was retarded and the symptoms were reduced in severity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beaumont, A. B. & Snell, M. E. (1935). J. Agric. Res. 50, 553.Google Scholar
Boynton, D. & Burrell, A. B. (1944). Soil Sci. 58, 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. D. (1928). Soil Sci. 26, 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, P. H. & Walsh, T. (1942). Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. 47 B, 205.Google Scholar
Garner, W. W. (1923). J. Agric. Res. 23, 27.Google Scholar
Imperial Bureau of Soil Science (1940). Tech. Comm. no. 39.Google Scholar
Knoblauch, H. C. & Odland, T. E. (1934). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 26, 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMurtrey, J. E. Jr. (1929). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 21, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, M. F. (1939). Circ. 127, Conn. Agr. Exp. Sta.Google Scholar
Parberry, N. H. (1937). Agric. Gaz. N.S.W. 48, 556.Google Scholar
Taylor, E. M. & Howatt, J. L. (1937). Sci. Agric. 17, 294.Google Scholar
Wallace, T. (1943). The Diagnosis of Mineral Deficiencies in Plants. London.Google Scholar
Walsh, T. & Clarke, E. J. (1944). Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. 50 B, 245.Google Scholar
Walsh, T. & Clarke, E. J. (1945). J. Roy. Hort. Soc. 70, 202.Google Scholar