Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:05:38.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lucerne investigation: II. Pollination and seed setting in lucerne strains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. Zaleski
A. Zaleski
Affiliation:
National Institute of Agricultural Botany, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The differences between strains in respect of tripping, pollination, self- and cross-fertilization, the number of pods and seeds set under comparable conditions, and the influence of weather and insects on these aspects was investigated during 1953–5 at Cambridge. Early, mid-season and late strains of lucerne were included in the experiments.

2. Early strains under natural conditions had a significantly higher percentage of florets tripped, and pods formed, than mid-season or late strains. The ease with which early strains tripped, and the likelihood that biological characters of their flowers were better adapted to environmental conditions, are possible reasons for their high percentage of pods set.

3. Tripping is essential for seed setting; at least 98·5% of pods resulted from florets tripped by insects or automatically.

4. There was little difference between strains in the percentage of self-fertilized florets, although in the early strains there was a slightly higher percentage, as well as a higher number of selffertilized plants. There was little difference between strains in the average number of seeds set per pod which was about 1·9 for artificial tripping and selfing and 1·5 for selfing under continuous cover. Under natural conditions, the estimated proportion of pods formed due to selfing was 20% in Eynsford and Du Puits, 12% in Provence and 16% in Grimm. The difference between strains in the percentage of pods formed by artificial crossing was small. The average number of seeds set per pod was 3·9 under natural conditions and 6·7 under artificial crossing for all strains.

5. Sunshine and high temperature encouraged tripping while rainfall suppressed tripping and pod setting. When the effect of temperature and rainfall were eliminated, duration of sunshine was the most important factor influencing tripping. Some variations in tripping and pod setting were found among plants of all strains in different seasons.

6. The population of wild bees was very low. Honeybees and other small insects caused some accidental tripping and crossing, especially in early strains.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , December 1956 , pp. 236 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, J. M. & White, W. J. (1935). J. Agric. Sci. 25, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, H. F. (1946). Gall Midges, 2, 39. London: Crosby Lockwood and Son, Ltd.Google Scholar
Carlson, J. W. (1946). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 38, 502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, G. A. & Lilly, C. E. (1955). Canad. J. Agric. Sci. 35, 422.Google Scholar
Jones, F. R. (1951). Agron. J. 43, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, R. P. (1943). Sci. Agric. 24, 29.Google Scholar
Lesins, K. (1950). LantbrHögek. Ann. 17, 422.Google Scholar
Pharis, R. L. & Urau, J. (1953). Canad. J. Agric. 33, 74.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, J. F. (1952). Amer. Nat. 86, 257.Google Scholar
Tysdal, H. M. (1946). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 38, 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, W. J. (1949). Advances in Agronomy, 1, 205. New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Zaleski, A. (1954). J. Agric. Sci. 44, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaleski, A. (1956 a). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 11, 23.Google Scholar
Zaleski, A. (1956 b). Nature, Land., 177, 334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar