Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T21:32:30.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Long-term effects of primary cultivations on crop yields in a four-course rotation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. J. Allen  and
M. G. Barker
E. J. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge
M. G. Barker
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An experiment is described which investigated for a period of 12 years the effects of four methods of basic cultivation – ploughing, rotary cultivating, cultivating and discing – on crop yields in a four-course rotation of winter wheat, sugar beet, spring barley followed by either potatoes (on one half of each main plot) or ley (on the other). The cultivations were carried out at two different times and each crop was grown at two levels of fertilizer.

The method of cultivation had no effect on the yield of barley when weeds were controlled by chemicals but, in the absence of such control, the three deeper working methods of cultivation gave higher yields than discing towards the end of the experiment. In the case of wheat, ploughing generally led to the highest yields and rotary cultivating led to higher yields than either cultivating or discing after the ley. Discing led to relatively low yields, particularly with cultural methods of weed control at the lower level of fertility.

With the sugar-beet crop, yields of sugar were higher in all rotations after ploughing than after cultivating or discing, irrespective of the method of weed control and although yields after rotary cultivating were similar to those after ploughing in the second rotation they did not consistently exceed those after cultivating or discing in the other two rotations. With discing, in the absence of chemical weed control the yields were markedly reduced in the last rotation period. Ploughing also led to the highest yields of potatoes but there were no consistent differences between the other methods and an apparent trend to lower yields after discing in the absence of chemical methods of weed control had not reached significance by the end of the experiment.

It was concluded that ploughing was a more reliable method of seedbed preparation, not only with regard to consistency of performance under different conditions but also with regard to depth of working and extent of weed control.

Ploughing appeared to be of particular value with the root crops used but the other methods led to satisfactory yields of the cereals grown after roots.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 78 , Issue 1 , February 1972 , pp. 57 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barker, M. G. (1963). Some effects of primary cultivations on crop yields in a four-course rotation. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 61, 173–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, G. M. & Norton, R. A. (1946). Results of recent tillage studies with corn. Rep. Iowa agric. Exp. Stn, part I, pp. 5–16.Google Scholar
Cěrný, V., Belza, J. & Müllerová, V. (1967). Deeper tillage and increased fertilizer rate on grey-brown podzolic soil and their effect on plants. Rostl. Výroba 13 (40), 1133–44. (Fld Crop Abstr. 1968, no. 4, abs. 2894.)Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Hull, R., Messem, A. B. & Webb, D. J. (1970). Effects of soil compaction on yield and fertilizer requirement of sugar beet. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 75, 533–7.Google Scholar
Hanley, F., Ridgman, W. J. & Allen, E. J. (1971). The effect of reducing seed-bed cultivations for autumn-sown crops on heavy land. Expl Husb. 20 30–34.Google Scholar
Hull, R. & Webb, D. J. (1967). The effect of subsoiling and different levels of manuring on yields of cereals, lucerne and sugar beet. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 69, 183–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jealott's Hill Reseabch Station (1970). Guide to Field Experiments and Farm Projects, pp. 57–62.Google Scholar
Jealott's Hill Research Station (1971). Guide to Field Experiments and Farm Projects, pp. 58–60.Google Scholar
Russell, E. W. (1950). The relation between soil cultivation and crop yields. Rep. Rothamsted exp. Stn for 1949, pp. 140–7.Google Scholar
Russell, E. W. (1956). The effect of very deep ploughing and of subsoiling on crop yields. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 48, 129–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, E. W. & Keen, B.A. (1941). Studies in soil cultivation. X. The results of a six year cultivation experiment. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 31, 326–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, K. (1952). Effects of soil cultivation on the growth and yield of winter wheat. III. Crop growth. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 3, 426–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilton, B. (1964). Effect of cultivation on the level of the surface of the soil. J. agric. Engng Res. 9, 214–9.Google Scholar