Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:42:24.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leaf Area as a Factor in Disease Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

L. G. Lim
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Lincoln University College of Agriculture, Christchurch, New Zealand
R. E. Gaunt
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Lincoln University College of Agriculture, Christchurch, New Zealand

Extract

Recently it has become evident that the estimates of crop losses by biotic and abiotic agents are not adequate for present-day requirements. With the increasing awareness of the need for more accurate and reliable crop loss estimates within both administrative and scientific disciplines, there has been an enhanced interest in the precision of disease measurement.

Type
Short Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chester, K. S. (1950). Plant disease losses: their appraisal and interpretation. Plant Disease Reporter Supplement 193, 189362.Google Scholar
Cobb, N. A. (1882). Contribution to an economic knowledge of the Australian rusts (Uredina). Agricultural Gazette of New South Wales 3, 6068.Google Scholar
Gaunt, R. E. (1978). Crop physiology: disease effects and yield loss. In Proceedings APPS Workshop Epidemiology and Crop Loss Assessment. Lincoln College, N.Z., pp. 9/112.Google Scholar
Gaunt, R. E. (1981). Physiological basis of yield loss. In Proceedings Stakeman Commemorative Symposium Crop Loss Assessment. Minneapolis, U.S.A. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Gaunt, R. E. & Manners, J. G. (1972). Host-parasite relations in loose-smut of wheat. I. The effect of infection on host growth. Annals of Botany 35, 11311141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. C. (1974). Assessment of plant diseasos and losses. Annual Review of Phytopathology 12, 2748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. C. & Tend, P. S. (1979). The quantification of production constraints associated with plant diseases. In Applied Biology, Vol. IV (ed. Coaker, T. H.), pp. 201267. New York: Academio Press.Google Scholar
Jenkyn, J. F. (1974). Effects of mildew on the growth and yield of spring barley: 1969–72. Annals of Applied Biology 78, 281288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkyn, J. F. (1976). Effects of mildew (Erysiphe graminis) on green leaf area of Zephyr spring barley, 1973. Annals of Applied Biology 82, 485488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Large, E. C. (1966). Measuring plant disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology 4, 928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Last, F. T. (1955). Effect of powdery mildew on the yield of spring sown barley. Plant Pathology 4, 2224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Last, F. T. (1962). Analysis of the effects of Erysiphe graminis DC on the growth of bailey. Annals of Botany 26, 279289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, L. G. (1981). Effects of powdery mildew and leaf rust on the apical development and yield of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Ph.D. thesis, Lincoln College, N.Z.Google Scholar
Moore, W. C. (1943). The measurement of plant diseases in the field. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 26, 2835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rea, B. L. & Scott, R. K. (1973). The effects of mildew (Erysiphe graminis)on leaf growth and yield of spring barley. Proceedings 1th British Insecticide and Fungicide Conference 1, 2937.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Eucarpia Bulletin 7. Also in Weed Research 14, 415421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar