Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:37:46.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laboratory assessment of ammonia emission after soil application of treated and untreated manures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2011

S. MONACO ,
D. SACCO ,
S. PELISSETTI ,
E. DINUCCIO ,
P. BALSARI ,
M. ROSTAMI  and
C. GRIGNANI
S. MONACO*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Forest and Land Management, University of Torino, Via Leonardo da Vinci 44, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy
D. SACCO
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Forest and Land Management, University of Torino, Via Leonardo da Vinci 44, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy
S. PELISSETTI
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Forest and Land Management, University of Torino, Via Leonardo da Vinci 44, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy
E. DINUCCIO
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Forestry and Environmental Economics and Engineering (DEIAFA), Mechanics Section, University of Torino, Via Leonardo da Vinci 44, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy
P. BALSARI
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Forestry and Environmental Economics and Engineering (DEIAFA), Mechanics Section, University of Torino, Via Leonardo da Vinci 44, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy
M. ROSTAMI
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, University of Malayer, Malayer, Iran
C. GRIGNANI
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Forest and Land Management, University of Torino, Via Leonardo da Vinci 44, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Ammonia (NH3) volatilization from soil-applied manure not only causes environmental pollution but also reduces the fertilization value of the manure. Anaerobic digestion and solid/liquid separation alter the physical and chemical characteristics of slurry, which affect NH3 emissions after application. The present study measured potential laboratory NH3 losses from different manures, untreated pig slurry and the liquid fractions of each untreated and digested slurry, after their application to two different soil types. The experiment was carried out in dynamic chambers using a photoacoustic infrared gas analyser to determine the NH3 concentration in the air stream directly.

The estimated values of nitrogen (N) emitted for surface-applied, untreated pig slurry were 0·26±0·064 mg per mg of applied total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN). For the liquid fractions of pig slurry and digested pig slurry, results were 0·13±0·064 and 0·16±0·064 mg/mg, respectively. Initial NH3–N emission rates from surface-applied, untreated pig slurry were higher than those measured for either liquid fraction; in the case of the untreated pig slurry, half was emitted in the first 4·9 h of measurement. Silty-loam soil showed a higher N emission than loam soil with surface-applied slurries. This result was probably due to the higher infiltration rate of loam soil, even offsetting the effect of its high soil pH. Immediate manure incorporation into the soil was shown to reduce NH3 emissions by 82%. Results demonstrated that a method combining dynamic chambers with a photoacoustic gas analyser was as reliable as the widely used acid traps method. Moreover, direct measurement with the gas analyser permits an increasing temporal resolution that gave a high-quality description of the NH3 emission dynamic.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 150 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 65 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amon, B., Kryvoruchko, V., Amon, T. & Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S. (2006). Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 112, 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, W., Brunsch, R., Hellebrand, J. & Kern, J. (2006). Methodology for measuring gaseous emissions from agricultural buildings, manure, and soil surfaces. In Workshop on Agricultural Air Quality – State of the Science (Eds Aneja, V. P., Schlesinger, W. H., Knighton, R., Jennings, G., Niyogi, D., Gilliam, W. & Duke, C. S.), pp. 233–241. Potomac, MD: North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Bourlot, G., Barberis, E., Del Vecchio, A. & Sacco, D. (2007). Il Suolo Agrario Piemontese. Supplement of Quaderni della Regione Piemonte – Agricoltura 56. Turin, Italy: Assessorato Agricoltura, Tutela della Flora e della Fauna.Google Scholar
Chantigny, M. H., Rochette, P., Angers, D. A., Massé, D. & Côté, D. (2004). Ammonia volatilization and selected soil characteristics following application of anaerobically digested pig slurry. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68, 306–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chantigny, M. H., Angers, D. A., Rochette, P., Belánger, G., Massé, D. & Côté, D. (2007). Gaseous nitrogen emissions and forage nitrogen uptake on soils fertilized with raw and treated swine manure. Journal of Environmental Quality 36, 1864–1872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinuccio, E., Berg, W. & Balsari, P. (2008). Gaseous emissions from the storage of untreated slurries and the fractions obtained after mechanical separation. Atmospheric Environment 42, 2448–2459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erisman, J. W., Bleeker, A. & Van Jaarsveld, J. A. (1998). Evaluation of ammonia emission abatement on the basis of measurements and model calculations. Environmental Pollution 102, 269–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goebes, M. D., Strader, R. & Davidson, C. (2003). An ammonia emission inventory for fertilizer application in the United States. Atmospheric Environment 37, 2539–2550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoy, S. (1995). Studies on the use of multi-gas monitoring in animal houses. Tierärztliche Umschau 50, 115–123.Google Scholar
Hutchings, N., Amon, B., Dämmgen, U. & Webb, J. (2009). Animal Husbandry and Manure Management. EMEP/EEA Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guide Book 2009 Chapter 4B. Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency.Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (1984). ISO 6778:1984, Water Quality – Determination of Ammonium – Potentiometric method. Geneva, Switzerland: ISA.Google Scholar
Le Cadre, E., Genermont, S., Decuq, C., Recous, S. & Cellier, P. (2005). A laboratory system to estimate ammonia volatilization. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 25, 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantovi, P., Fabbri, C., Soldano, M. & Piccinini, S. (2009). La separazione del digestato aumenta il potere fertilizzante. L'Informatore Agrario 43, 55–58.Google Scholar
Misselbrook, T. H., Nicholson, F. A. & Chambers, B. J. (2005). Predicting ammonia losses following the application of livestock manure to land. Bioresource Technology 96, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pain, B. F., Misselbrook, T. H., Clarkson, C. R. & Rees, Y. J. (1990). Odour and ammonia emissions following the spreading of anaerobically-digested pig slurry on grassland. Biological Waste 34, 259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, J. & Sørensen, P. (2008). Loss of nitrogen and carbon during storage of the fibrous fraction of separated pig slurry and influence on nitrogen availability. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 146, 403–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reidy, B., Dammgen, U., Dohler, H., Eurich-Menden, B., Van Evert, F. K., Hutchings, N. J., Luesink, H. H., Menzi, H., Misselbrook, T. H., Monteny, G. J. & Webb, J. (2008). Comparison of models used for national agricultural ammonia emission inventories in Europe: liquid manure systems. Atmospheric Environment 42, 3452–3464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochette, P., Angers, D. A., Chantigny, M. H., Macdonald, J. D., Bissonette, N. & Bertrand, N. (2009). Ammonia volatilization following surface application of urea to tilled and no-till soils: A laboratory comparison. Soil and Tillage Research 103, 310–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubǽk, G. H., Henriksen, K., Petersen, J., Rasmussen, B. & Sommer, S. G. (1996). Effects of application technique and anaerobic digestion on gaseous nitrogen loss from animal slurry applied to ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 126, 481–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Søgaard, H. T., Sommer, S. G., Hutchings, N. J., Huijsmans, J. F. M., Bussink, D. W. & Nicholson, F. (2002). Ammonia volatilization from field-applied animal slurry – the ALFAM model. Atmospheric Environment 36, 3309–3319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soil Survey Staff (1998). Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 8th edn. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Sommer, S. G. & Ersbøll, A. K. (1994). Soil tillage effects on ammonia volatilization from surface-applied or injected animal slurry. Journal of Environmental Quality 23, 493–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, S. G. & Jacobsen, O. H. (1999). Infiltration of slurry liquid and volatilization of ammonia from surface applied pig slurry as affected by soil water content. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 132, 297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, S. G., Genermont, S., Cellier, P., Hutchings, N. J., Olesen, J. E. & Morvan, T. (2003). Processes controlling ammonia emission from livestock slurry in the field. European Journal of Agronomy 19, 465–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, S. G., Hansen, M. N. & Søgaard, H. T. (2004 a). Infiltration of slurry and ammonia volatilisation. Biosystems Engineering 88, 359–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, S. G., Schjoerring, J. K. & Denmead, O. T. (2004 b). Ammonia emission from mineral fertilizers and fertilized crops. Advances in Agronomy 82, 557–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, S. G., Jensen, L. S., Clausen, S. B. & Søgaard, H. T. (2006). Ammonia volatilization from surface-applied livestock slurry as affected by slurry composition and slurry infiltration depth. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 144, 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sposito, G. (1989). The Chemistry of Soils. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sutton, M. A., Lee, D. S., Dollard, G. J. & Fowler, D. (1998). Introduction atmospheric ammonia emission, deposition and environmental impacts. Atmospheric Environment 32, 269–271.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. B. & Meisinger, J. J. (2002). Management factors affecting ammonia volatilization from land-applied cattle slurry in the mid-Atlantic USA. Journal of Environmental Quality 31, 1329–1338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, C. J., Akhonzada, N. A., Hamilton, J. T. G. & Matthews, D. I. (2008). Rate and mode of application of the urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide on ammonia volatilization from surface-applied urea. Soil Use and Management 24, 246–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulf, S., Maeting, M. & Clemens, J. (2002). Application technique and slurry co-fermentation effects on ammonia, nitrous oxide, and methane emissions after spreading: I. Ammonia volatilisation. Journal of Environmental Quality 31, 1789–1794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar