Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-07T04:48:43.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The interrelationship of some components of forage quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. J. Thomson  and
H. H. Rogers
A. J. Thomson
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Trumpington, Cambridge
H. H. Rogers
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Trumpington, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

To produce forage crop varieties of improved quality, the plant breeder must consider both the content of the quality components and their interrelationships. The methods used to examine the interrelationships involve simple correlations and path analyses. In the path analyses a dependent variate is specified which is completely and additively determined by a number of independent variates. The amount of variation present in the dependent variate accounted for by variation in each of the independent variates is calculated. The effects of an increase in the mean content of one of the quality components on the other components in the path system is predicted.

As an example of the method, data for two years is analysed from timothy polycross progenies grown as swards and spaced plants. Primary and subsequent growths are compared.

There are inconsistencies in the interrelationships of the quality components between years and between swards and spaced plants. Although only phenotypic statistics were calculated, the findings have implications in relation to plant breeding.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , April 1971 , pp. 283 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burton, G. W., Hart, R. H. & Lowrey, R. S. (1967). Improving forage quality in bennudagrass by breeding. Crop Sci. 7, 329–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, I. T., Asay, K. N., Wedin, W. F. & Vetter, R. L. (1969). Genetic variability in in vitro dry matter digestibility of fall-saved reed canarygrass, Phalaris arundinacea L. Crop Sci. 9, 162–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, R. J. (1970). Problems of breeding pasture plants for improved herbage nutritive value. Proc. 11th int. Orasald. Congr. Australia. 251–4.Google Scholar
Dewey, D. R. & Lu, K. H. (1959). A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production. Agron. J. 51, 515–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donefer, R., Crampton, E. W. & Lloyd, S. E. (1966). The prediction of digestible energy intake potential (NVI) of forages using a simple in vitro technique. Proc. Xth int. Grassld. Congr., Helsinki, pp. 442–5.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, D. H. (1970). Variation of chemical constituents within and between alfalfa populations. Proc. 11th int. Orassld. Congr. Australia. 267–70.Google Scholar
Kamsal, A. E. (1969). Components of yield in field beans, Vicia faba L. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72, 359–64.Google Scholar
Kempthorne, O. (1957). An Introduction to Genetic Statistics, pp 286–99. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Li, C. C. (1955). Population Genetics, chap. 12, pp. 144–71. Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, W. F. (1969). The nutritive value of forage crops. Adv. Agron 21, 1–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, H. H. (1970). Breeding temperate grasses for increased animal production. Proc. l/th int. Grassld Congr. Australia. A70–A77.Google Scholar
Rogers, H. H. & Thompson, A. J. (1970). Aspects of the agronomy and genetics of quality components in a diallel set of progenies of Lolium perenne L. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 75, 145–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, H. H. & Whitmore, E. T. (1966). A modified method for the in vitro determination of herbage digestibility in plant-breeding studies. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 21, 150–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Shea, J., Ribeiro, M. A. V. & Moran, M. A. (1968). Relationships between digestibility (in vitro) crude fibre and cellulose content of some animal feeds. Ir. J. agric Res. 7, 173–81.Google Scholar
Smith, Dale (1970). Influence of cool and warm temperatures and temperature reversal at inflorescence emergence on yield and chemical composition of timothy and brome grass at anthesis. Proc. 11th int. Grassld Congr., Australia. 510–14.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A., Terry, R. A., Deriaz, R. E. & Outen, G. E. (1969). The digestibility of structural carbohydrates of grasses by rumen micro-organisms in vitro. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 24, 238–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. J. agric. Res. 20, 557–85.Google Scholar