Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:16:06.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inheritance of seed yield, maturity and seed weight of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) under semi-arid rainfed conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. W. White ,
R. M. Ochoa ,
F. P. Ibarra  and
S. P. Singh
J. W. White
Affiliation:
Centro International de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Apartado Aereo 6713, Cali, Colombia
R. M. Ochoa
Affiliation:
Instituto National de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias (INIFAP), CAE Pabellon, Apartado 20, Pabellon, Aguascalientes, CP 20660, Mexico
F. P. Ibarra
Affiliation:
Instituto National de Investigaciones Forestales y Agropecuarias (INIFAP), CAE Valle del Guadiana, Apartado Postal 186, 34000 Durango, Durango, Mexico
S. P. Singh
Affiliation:
Centro International de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Apartado Aereo 6713, Cali, Colombia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

To develop an effective breeding programme for rainfed production of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), the inheritance of seed yield under such conditions should be understood, preferably considering the effects of environment to account for site or season specificity. Thus, heritability, expected and realized gain from selection, and combining ability were evaluated for a nine-parent diallel of common bean without reciprocals but including parents, at two locations each in Mexico and Colombia, using the F2 and F3 population bulks. Heritability estimated from regressions of F3 on F2 ranged from 0·09 ± 0·18 (S.E.) to 0·75±0·25 for seed yield, from 0·26±009 to 0·34±009 for days to maturity and from0·57±004 to 0·80±004 for 100-seed weight. Expected gain from selection in the F2 was estimated as a percentage of the population mean, selecting the upper 20% of the populations. Expected gain in seed yield ranged from 1·8 to 8·4% in Mexico and from 6·5 to 28·1% in Colombia. Realized gains in seed yield in the F3 were 0·4–7·4% in Mexico and 2·9–15·7% in Colombia. Realized gain values for days to maturity were < 2·2%, and for 100-seed weight > 13·4%. General combining ability (GCA) mean squares (estimated using Griffing's Method 2, Model 1) were significant (P <0·01) and larger than those for specific combining ability (SCA) for all traits at all locations. The parents from the Mexican highlands tended to have a positive GCA effect for yield in Mexico but negative values in Colombia, whereas parents adapted to mid-elevation tropical environments showed the opposite tendency. However, all significant GCA values of breeding line V8025 were positive in both countries.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 122 , Issue 2 , April 1994 , pp. 265 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acosta Gallegos, J. A. & Kohashi Shibata, J. (1989). Effect of water stress on growth and yield of indeterminate dry-bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars. Field Crops Research 20, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, A. (1988). Plant Breeding for Stress Environments. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Dudal, R. (1968). Definition of soil units for the soil map of the world. World Resources Report 33. Rome, Italy: FAO.Google Scholar
Frey, K. J. & Horner, T. (1955). Comparison of actual and predicted gains in barley selection experiments. Agronomy Journal 47, 186–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffing, B. (1956). Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 9, 463–493.Google Scholar
Hurd, E. A. (1976). Plant breeding for drought resistance. In Water Deficits and Plant Growth. IV. Soil Water Measurements, Plant Responses, and Breeding for Drought Resistance (Ed. Kozlowski, T. T.), pp. 317–348. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, D. R., Kretchmer, P. J., Zuluaga, S. & Jones, P. G. (1983). Field bean. In Symposium on Potential Productivity of Field Crops under Different Environments, pp. 227–248. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Motto, M., Soressi, G. P. & Salamini, F. (1978). Seed size inheritance in a cross between wild and cultivated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Genetica 49, 31–36.Google Scholar
Nienhuis, J. & Singh, S. P. (1986). Combining ability analyses and relationships among yield, yield components, and architectural traits in dry bean. Crop Science 26, 21–27.Google Scholar
Nienhuis, J. & Singh, S. P. (1988 a). Genetics of seed yield and its components in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of Middle-American origin. I. General combining ability. Plant Breeding 101, 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nienhuis, J. & Singh, S. P. (1988 b). Genetics of seed yield and its components in common bean (Phaseolous vulgaris L.) of Middle-American origin. II. Genetic variance, heritability and expected response from selection. Plant Breeding 101, 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sas Institute (1985). SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Schoonhoven, A. Van & Pastor-Corrales, M. A. (1987). Standard System for the Evaluation of Bean Germplasm. Cali, Colombia: CIAT.Google Scholar
Singh, S. P. & Gutierrez, J. A. (1990). Effect of plant density on selection for seed yield in two population types of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Euphytica 51, 173–178.Google Scholar
Singh, S. P., Cajiao, C., Gutierrez, J. A., Garcia, J., Pastor-Corrales, M. A. & Morales, F. J. (1989). Selection for seed yield in inter-gene pool crosses of common bean. Crop Science 29, 1126–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S. P., Lépiz, R., Gutiérrez, J. A., Urrea, C., Molina, A. & Teran, H. (1990). Yield testing of early generation populations of common bean. Crop Science 30, 874–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S. P., Teran, H., Molina, A. & Gutierrez, J. A. (1991 a). Genetics of seed yield and its components in common bean (Phaseolus vulgarisL.) of Andean origin. Plant Breeding 107, 254–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S. P., Gepts, P. & Debouck, D. (1991 b). Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Economic Botany 45, 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S. P., Terén, H., Molina, A. & Gutiérrez, J. A. (1992). Combining ability for seed yield and its componentsa in common bean of Andean origin. Crop Science 32, 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. D. & Kinman, M. L. (1965). The use of parentoffspring regression as an estimator of heritability. Crop Science 5, 595–596.Google Scholar
Sponchiado, B. N., White, J. W., Castillo, J. A. & Jones, P. G. (1989). Root growth of four common bean cultivars in relation to drought tolerance in environments with contrasting soil types. Experimental Agriculture 25, 249–257.Google Scholar
Wallace, D. H., Yourstone, K. S., Masaya, P. N. & Zobel, R. W. (1993). Photoperiod control over partitioning between reproductive and vegetative growth. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86, 6–16.Google Scholar
White, J. W. & Gonzalez, A. (1990). Characterization of the negative association between seed yield and seed size among genotypes of common bean. Field Crops Research 23, 159–175.Google Scholar
White, J. W. & Izquierdo, J. (1991). Physiology of yield potential and stress tolerance. In Common Beans: Research for Crop Improvement (Eds Schoonhoven, A. van & Voysest, O.), pp. 287–382. Wallingford: CAB International and Cali, Colombia: CIAT.Google Scholar
White, J. W. & Laing, D. R. (1989). Photoperiod response of flowering in diverse genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Field Crops Research 22, 113–128.Google Scholar
White, J. W. & Singh, S. P. (1991). Sources and inheritance of earliness in tropically adapted indeterminate common bean. Euphytica 55, 15–19.Google Scholar
White, J. W., Castillo, J. A. & Ehleringer, J. (1990). Associations between productivity, root growth and carbon isotope discrimination in Phaseolus vulgaris under water deficit. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 17, 189–198.Google Scholar
White, J. W., Singh, S. P., Pino, C., Rios, B., , M.J. & BUDDENHAGEN, I. (1992). Effects of seed size and photoperiod response on crop growth and yield of common bean. Field Crops Research 28, 295–307.Google Scholar